An alternative approach to create and deploy discrete choice experiments

被引:1
|
作者
Silberg, Timothy Robert [1 ,3 ]
Richardson, R. B. [2 ]
Lopez, M. C. [2 ]
Grisotti, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Sociol & Polit Sci, Florianopolis, Brazil
[2] Michigan State Univ, Community Sustainabil, E Lansing, MI USA
[3] Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Ctr Filosofia & Ciencias Humanas, Campus Univ Trinidade,Caixa Postal 476, Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
关键词
Discrete choice experiments; physical symbols; decision-making; technology implications; ATTRIBUTES;
D O I
10.1080/13645579.2023.2183010
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Discrete Choice Experiments (DCEs) are widely used in behavioral sciences to examine how humans value attributes of a technology, how those values drive decisions, and how they make trade-offs. The method has increasingly been used to inform technologies and interventions for addressing critical issues (e.g. disease and hunger). Different formats and symbols are used to deliver DCEs and represent attributes, respectively (e.g. questionnaire presenting two vaccines with different photos representing risks). When these formats or symbols are unfamiliar to respondents, they are unlikely to understand DCEs, raising questions about the validity of findings and their contribution to future technology and interventions. This research note offers a pathway to develop more robust DCEs with participants. In doing so, participant understanding of the experiment is increased and more accurate depictions of their choices are captured.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 483
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of alternative elicitation formats in discrete choice experiments
    Scheufele, Gabriela
    Bennett, Jeff
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2013, 57 (02) : 214 - 233
  • [2] Discrete choice experiments-A unified approach
    Das, Ashish
    Singh, Rakhi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 2020, 205 : 193 - 202
  • [3] The use of alternative preference elicitation methods in complex discrete choice experiments
    Yoo, Hong Il
    Doiron, Denise
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2013, 32 (06) : 1166 - 1179
  • [4] A Query Approach to Modeling Attendance to Attributes in Discrete Choice Experiments
    Kemper, Nathan
    Popp, Jennie
    Nayga, Rodolfo M.
    Bazzani, Claudia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2024, 49 (02)
  • [5] The 'no-choice' alternative in conjoint choice experiments
    Haaijer, R
    Kamakura, W
    Wedel, M
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARKET RESEARCH, 2001, 43 (01): : 93 - 106
  • [6] Designing Discrete Choice Experiments Using a Patient-Oriented Approach
    Magda Aguiar
    Mark Harrison
    Sarah Munro
    Tiasha Burch
    K. Julia Kaal
    Marie Hudson
    Nick Bansback
    Tracey-Lea Laba
    [J]. The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2021, 14 : 389 - 397
  • [7] Designing Discrete Choice Experiments Using a Patient-Oriented Approach
    Aguiar, Magda
    Harrison, Mark
    Munro, Sarah
    Burch, Tiasha
    Kaal, K. Julia
    Hudson, Marie
    Bansback, Nick
    Laba, Tracey-Lea
    [J]. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2021, 14 (04): : 389 - 397
  • [8] Choice certainty, consistency, and monotonicity in discrete choice experiments
    Mattmann, Matteo
    Logar, Ivana
    Brouwer, Roy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2019, 8 (02) : 109 - 127
  • [9] Preference Stability and Choice Consistency in Discrete Choice Experiments
    Dan Rigby
    Michael Burton
    Jo Pluske
    [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2016, 65 : 441 - 461
  • [10] Varying choice set sizes in discrete choice experiments
    Akinc, Deniz
    Street, Deborah J.
    Vandebroek, Martina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHOICE MODELLING, 2024, 52