Radiation Exposure during Prostatic Artery Embolization: A Single Institution Review

被引:0
|
作者
Ngov, Daniel [1 ]
Self, Stella C. W. [2 ]
Schammel, Christine M. G. [3 ,5 ]
Devane, A. Michael [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Carolina, Sch Med Greenville, Greenville, SC USA
[2] Univ South Carolina, Arnold Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Greenville, SC USA
[3] Pathol Associates Inc, Greenville, SC USA
[4] Prisma Hlth Upstate, Dept Radiol, Greenville, SC USA
[5] USCSOMG, Clin Res, Dept Pathol, 8 Mem Med Ct, Greenville, SC 29605 USA
来源
HEALTH PHYSICS | 2023年 / 124卷 / 03期
关键词
dose assessment; exposure; radiation; fluoroscopy; medical;
D O I
10.1097/HP.0000000000001662
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Prostate artery embolization is a minimally invasive treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia, and imaging is indispensable for the technical success of this procedure; however, imaging is a major source of radiation exposure for patients and healthcare providers. Radiation emission during prostate artery embolization procedures at a single institution was evaluated to determine radiation exposure with the goal to work toward minimizing exposure. All patients at a single institution that underwent outpatient unilateral/bilateral prostate artery embolization between 4 January 2019 and 16 November 2021 were retrospectively evaluated; data collected included body mass index, prostate volume, and indications for prostate artery embolization. Technical parameters recorded were air kerma, procedure time, fluoroscopy time, number of acquisitions, and intra-procedural imaging modalities. Fisher's t-test, ANOVA, and chi-square analyses were used as appropriate for statistical analysis (P < 0.05). Overall, 56 patients were included in the study. Body mass index (obesity; P = 0.0017) was a significant predictor of increased air kerma; prostate size and bilateral vs. unilateral prostate artery embolization were not significantly associated with increased air kerma despite the number of acquisitions being significantly different between bilateral and unilateral embolization (P = 0.0064). When evaluating radiation exposure during prostate artery embolization, increased body mass index significantly predicted increased air kerma. Contrary to the literature, the extent of embolization (bilateral vs. unilateral) was not associated with increased air kerma regardless of higher acquisitions and procedure time associated with bilateral prostate artery embolization. Increased radiation protection efforts should be considered for patients with higher body mass index to protect patients and practitioners.Health Phys. 124(0):000-000; 2023
引用
收藏
页码:200 / 207
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prostatic artery embolization: radiation exposure to patients and staff
    Garzon, W. J.
    Andrade, G.
    Dubourcq, F.
    Abud, D. G.
    Bredow, M.
    Khoury, H. J.
    Kramer, R.
    JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION, 2016, 36 (02) : 246 - 254
  • [2] Radiation Exposure of Patients and Interventional Radiologists during Prostatic Artery Embolization: A Prospective Single-Operator Study
    Andrade, Gustavo
    Khoury, Helen J.
    Garzon, William J.
    Dubourcq, Felipe
    Bredow, Michel F.
    Monsignore, Lucas M.
    Abud, Daniel G.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2017, 28 (04) : 517 - 521
  • [3] Radiation dose of prostatic artery embolization for benign prostatic hyperplasia: A protocol for systematic review
    Liu, Jinglei
    Zhang, Kai
    Wu, Xiaolong
    Cui, Bao
    Liang, Zhihui
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (46) : E31595
  • [4] RADIATION DOSES TO ANAESTHETISTS DURING PROSTATIC ARTERY EMBOLIZATION INTERVENTIONAL PROCEDURES
    Garzon, W. J.
    Khoury, H. J.
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2019, 185 (02) : 196 - 200
  • [5] Radiation Exposure During Prostatic Artery Embolisation: A Systematic Review and Calculation of Associated Risks
    Zumstein, Valentin
    Binder, Jorg
    Gusewell, Sabine
    Betschart, Patrick
    Pratsinis, Manolis
    Mullhaupt, Gautier
    Hechelhammer, Lukas
    Schmid, Hans-Peter
    Abt, Dominik
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2021, 7 (03): : 608 - 611
  • [6] Prostatic artery embolization for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a review
    Young, Shamar
    Golzarian, Jafar
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2018, 28 (03) : 284 - 287
  • [7] Multicenter Quantification of Radiation Exposure and Associated Risks for Prostatic Artery Embolization in 1476 Patients
    Ayyagari, Raj
    Rahman, Saumik Z.
    Grizzard, Kevin
    Mustafa, Adel
    Staib, Lawrence H.
    Makkia, Rasha S.
    Bhatia, Shivank
    Bilhim, Tiago
    Carnevale, Francisco C.
    Davis, Clifford
    Fischman, Aaron
    Isaacson, Ari
    McClure, Timothy
    McWilliams, Justin
    Nutting, Charles
    Richardson, Andrew
    Salem, Riad
    Sapoval, Marc
    Yu, Hyeon
    RADIOLOGY, 2024, 310 (03)
  • [8] Re: Radiation Exposure During Prostate Artery Embolization: a Systematic Review and Calculation of Associated Risks
    Kaplan, Steven A.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 205 (06): : 1799 - 1799
  • [9] Review of Current Literature for Prostatic Artery Embolization
    Yu, Hyeon
    Isaacson, Ari J.
    Burke, Charles T.
    SEMINARS IN INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2016, 33 (03) : 231 - 235
  • [10] Center experience and other determinants of patient radiation exposure during prostatic artery embolization: a retrospective study in three Scandinavian centers
    Svarc, Petra
    Hagen, Thijs
    Waltenburg, Hanne
    Andersson, Christian
    Blackberg, Mats
    Baco, Eduard
    Taudorf, Mikkel
    Roder, Martin Andreas
    Lindgren, Hans
    Klow, Nils-Einar
    Loenn, Lars Birger
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2022, 32 (04) : 2404 - 2413