Ten-year outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for multivessel or left main coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:6
|
作者
Feng, Shitao [1 ]
Li, Mingli [1 ]
Fei, Jiayue [1 ]
Dong, Anqin [1 ]
Zhang, Wenli [1 ]
Fu, Yanhua [1 ]
Zhao, Yang [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhengzhou Univ, Dept Geriatr, Affiliated Hosp 5, 3 Kang fu Qian St, Zhengzhou 450052, Henan, Peoples R China
关键词
Percutaneous coronary intervention; Coronary artery bypass grafting; Meta-analysis; BARE-METAL STENTS; EVEROLIMUS-ELUTING STENTS; FOLLOW-UP; SURGICAL REVASCULARIZATION; SURGERY; TRIAL; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1186/s13019-023-02101-y
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundShort-term and long-term comparative outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for multivessel coronary artery (MVCA) or left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease are highly debated.GoalsWe performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the difference between PCI and CABG for the treatment of patients with MVCA or LMCA in long-term follow-up.MethodsLiteratures were searched in PubMed, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library from January 1, 2000 to January 1, 2021, including RCTs and observational studies (OSs). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 10 years follow-up, and the secondary outcomes included cardiac mortality, repeated revascularization, myocardial infarction, and stroke.ResultsA total of 5 RCTs reporting data from 3013 participants and 4 OSs of 5608 participants were included for analysis. There was no significant difference between PCI and CABG in all-cause mortality (Odds Ratio (OR) 1.03 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89 to 1.19]), whereas PCI was associated with higher cardiac mortality (OR 0.76 [95% CI 0.65 to 0.90]) and repeated revascularization rate comparing to CABG (OR 1.77 [95% CI 1.08 to 2.89]; I-2 = 94.61%). The difference between PCI and CABG in repeated revascularization in either RCTs or OSs, in myocardial infarction in either RCTs or OSs were not significant. In OSs, stroke rate in PCI group was lower than those in CABG, but not in RCTs. There was a significant increase of stroke rate in CABG comparing to PCI (OR 0.65 [95% CI 0.53 to 0.80]; I-2 = 0.00%). No significant difference between PCI and CABG in myocardial infarction was not observed (OR 0.92 [95% CI 0.64 to 1.31]; I-2 = 57.84%).ConclusionEvidence from our study and prior studies suggested the superiority of CABG over PCI in improving 5- but not 10-year survival among patients with MVCA. In the contrast, there was no significant difference between CABG and PCI for treating patients with LMCA in either 5- or 10-year survival rate. More long-term trials are needed to better define differences of outcome between 2 techniques.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ten-year outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for multivessel or left main coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shitao Feng
    Mingli Li
    Jiayue Fei
    Anqin Dong
    Wenli Zhang
    Yanhua Fu
    Yang Zhao
    [J]. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 18
  • [2] Meta-analysis of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease
    Khan, Abdur R.
    Golwala, Harsh
    Tripathi, Avnish
    Riaz, Hans
    Kumar, Arnav
    Flaherty, Michael P.
    Bhaft, Deepak L.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 119 (12): : 1949 - 1956
  • [3] PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION VS CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING IN LEFT MAIN CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND UPDATED META-ANALYSIS
    Hennessy, C.
    Henry, J. A.
    Brameier, D. T.
    Kharbanda, R. K.
    Myerson, S. G.
    [J]. HEART, 2021, 107 : A56 - A56
  • [4] Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in left main coronary artery disease: A review
    Martins, Manuel Neto
    [J]. REVISTA PORTUGUESA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2022, 41 (11) : 953 - 968
  • [5] Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease in Diabetic Patients: A Meta-Analysis
    Kim, Jitae
    Alam, Mahboob
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 76 (17) : B68 - B68
  • [6] Reconstructed meta-analysis of percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main disease
    Chew, N. W. S.
    Ng, C. H.
    Kong, G.
    Tan, D.
    Lim, W. H.
    Kofidis, T.
    Yip, J.
    Loh, P. H.
    Chan, K. H.
    Low, A.
    Lee, C. H.
    Yeo, T. C.
    Tan, H. C.
    Chan, M. Y.
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2022, 43 : 1415 - 1415
  • [7] Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Hennessy, Conor
    Henry, John
    Parameswaran, Gokul
    Brameier, Devon
    Kharbanda, Rajesh
    Myerson, Saul
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (11)
  • [8] Ten-Year Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Suffering from Left Main Coronary Disease: A Meta-Analysis
    Wang, Hong
    Wang, Hongli
    Wei, Yuyuan
    Li, Xinxin
    Jhummun, Vineet
    Ahmed, Mohamad A.
    [J]. DIABETES THERAPY, 2021, 12 (04) : 1041 - 1054
  • [9] Ten-Year Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Suffering from Left Main Coronary Disease: A Meta-Analysis
    Hong Wang
    Hongli Wang
    Yuyuan Wei
    Xinxin Li
    Vineet Jhummun
    Mohamad A. Ahmed
    [J]. Diabetes Therapy, 2021, 12 : 1041 - 1054
  • [10] PERCUTANEOUS INTERVENTION OR CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING FOR LEFT MAIN STEM CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE? A META-ANALYSIS
    Ullah, Waqas
    Sattar, Yasar
    Susheela, Ammu
    Ullah, Irfan
    Mukhtar, Maryam
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 75 (11) : 1396 - 1396