Different effects of L1 and L2 phonology on L3 lexical learning: An ERP study

被引:3
|
作者
Mulik, Stanislav [1 ]
Carrasco-Ortiz, Haydee [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Queretaro, Santiago De Queretaro, Queretaro, Mexico
关键词
bilingualism; event-related potentials; interlingual homophones; language non-selective access; third language learning; word learning; VISUAL WORD RECOGNITION; TIME-COURSE; NATIVE LANGUAGE; BILINGUALS; FREQUENCY; N400; TRANSLATION; POTENTIALS; ACTIVATION; HOMOPHONES;
D O I
10.1177/02676583211054448
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study investigated the influence of phonological word representations from both first language (L1) and second language (L2) on third language (L3) lexical learning in L1-dominant Spanish-English bilinguals. More specifically, we used event-related potentials (ERPs) to determine whether L1 Spanish and L2 English phonology modulates bilinguals' brain response to newly learned L3 Slovak words, some of which had substantial phonological overlap with either L1 or L2 words (interlingual homophones) in comparison to matched control words with little or no phonological overlap. ERPs were recorded from a group of 20 Spanish-English bilinguals in response to 120 auditory Slovak words, both before and after a three-day-long learning period during which they associated the L3 Slovak novel words with their L1 Spanish translations. Behaviorally, both L1 Spanish and L2 English homophony facilitated the learning of L3 Slovak words in a similar manner. In contrast, the electrophysiological results of the post-training ERPs, but not the pre-training ERPs, showed an N100 effect for L2 English interlingual homophones and opposite N400 effects for L1 Spanish and L2 English interlingual homophones in comparison to control words. These findings suggest different neurocognitive mechanisms in the use of L1 and L2 phonological information when learning novel words in an L3.
引用
收藏
页码:493 / 518
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] L3 phonology: contributions of L1 and L2 to L3 pronunciation learning by Hong Kong speakers
    Chen, Hsueh Chu
    Han, Qian Wen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTILINGUALISM, 2019, 16 (04) : 492 - 512
  • [2] L1, L2 and L3: Same or different?
    Bardel, Camilla
    Falk, Ylva
    SECOND LANGUAGE RESEARCH, 2021, 37 (03) : 459 - 464
  • [3] L1 and L2 Distance Effects in Learning L3 Dutch
    Schepens, Job J.
    van der Slik, Frans
    van Hout, Roeland
    LANGUAGE LEARNING, 2016, 66 (01) : 224 - 256
  • [4] L1 and L2 transfer to L3 in L3 and L2 learners of Standard Arabic
    Albirini, Abdulkafi
    Saadah, Eman
    Alhawary, Mohammad T.
    LINGUISTIC APPROACHES TO BILINGUALISM, 2020, 10 (06) : 745 - 774
  • [5] Is L2 learning the same as L1 learning? Learning L2 phonology in optimality theory
    Swanson, KAB
    PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE OF SECOND LANGUAGE RESEARCH, PROCEEDINGS, 2001, : 23 - 41
  • [6] Effects of L1 orthography and L1 phonology on L2 English pronunciation
    Mairano, Paolo
    Bassetti, Bene
    Sokolovic-Perovic, Mirjana
    Cerni, Tania
    REVUE FRANCAISE DE LINGUISTIQUE APPLIQUEE, 2018, 23 (01): : 45 - 57
  • [7] Machine Learning and Symbolic Learning for the Recognition of Leukemia L1, L2 and L3
    Ochoa-Montiel, Rocio
    Sossa, Humberto
    Olague, Gustavo
    Sanchez-Lopez, Carlos
    PATTERN RECOGNITION, MCPR 2022, 2022, 13264 : 360 - 369
  • [8] L1 and L2 role assignment in L3 learning. Is there a pattern?
    Falk, Ylva
    Lindqvist, Christina
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTILINGUALISM, 2019, 16 (04) : 411 - 424
  • [9] Investigation of Coster-Kronig transition probabilities (L1→L2, L1→L3, and L2→L3) for Hf and Hf compounds
    Cengiz, Erhan
    Apaydin, Gokhan
    Aylikci, Volkan
    Kaya, Necati
    Tirasoglu, Engin
    JOURNAL OF THE PHYSICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN, 2008, 77 (05)
  • [10] Determination of Coster-Kronig transition probabilities (L1→L2, L1→L3 and L2→L3) for Hg and Bi in molecules
    Sögüt, Ö
    Büyükkasap, E
    Küçükönder, A
    Ertugrul, M
    Erdogan, H
    X-RAY SPECTROMETRY, 2002, 31 (01) : 71 - 74