Comparison of regression, ANN, ANFIS, and ChatGPT prediction of turning cutting force

In this study, training and prediction performance on turning data were investigated with ChatGPT, which is a popular AI platform nowadays. In this context, the resultant cutting forces obtained as a result of different turning simulations with FEM, training and estimation were made using regression, ANN, ANFIS methods. Using the same data, training and predictions were made with ChatGPT-3 with different prediction algorithms. As a result, the lowest average error rates in the predictions made with the training data; 2E-6% for ANFIS in prediction methods and 0.19% for ANN1 conversation in GPT-3 were obtained. The lowest average error rates in the predictions made with the test data; 5.41% for regression using logarithmic Box-Cox transformation in prediction methods, and 22.66% for ANN1 conversation in GPT-3 were achieved. The highest prediction performance in GPT-3 conversations was observed when GPT-3 was asked to make predictions with ANN algorithm on both training and test data. As a result, GPT-3 has not yet generated acceptable solutions for machining problems due to its low performance in predicting test data. However, due to the fast advancement of artificial intelligence technologies, it is obvious that solutions to this and more engineering problems will be generated in near future.Highlights Prediction with ChatGPT-3Prediction performance of artificial intelligenceCutting force prediction of turning operation