Project DECIDE, part II: decision-making places for people with dementia in Alzheimer's disease: supporting advance decision-making by improving person-environment fit

被引:1
|
作者
Florack, Janina [1 ,2 ]
Abele, Christina [1 ,3 ]
Baisch, Stefanie [1 ]
Forstmeier, Simon [1 ]
Garmann, Daniel [1 ,2 ]
Grond, Martin [2 ]
Hornke, Ingmar [4 ]
Karakaya, Tarik [5 ]
Karneboge, Jonas [1 ]
Knopf, Boris [4 ]
Lindl, Gregor [1 ,5 ]
Mueller, Tanja [1 ]
Oswald, Frank [6 ]
Pfeiffer, Nathalie [1 ,5 ]
Prvulovic, David [5 ]
Poth, Aoife [1 ,5 ]
Reif, Andreas [5 ]
Schmidtmann, Irene [3 ]
Theile-Schuerholz, Anna [1 ]
Ullrich, Heiko [2 ]
Haberstroh, Julia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Siegen, Sch Life Sci, Dept Psychol Psychol Aging Res PAR, Fac 5, Adolf Reichwein Str 2a, D-57068 Siegen, Germany
[2] Klinikum Siegen, Siegen, Germany
[3] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Univ Med Ctr, Mainz, Germany
[4] Wurdezentrum, Frankfurt, Germany
[5] Univ Hosp Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
[6] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
关键词
Dementia; Alzheimer's disease; Memory clinic; Supported decision making; Capacity to consent; Belonging; Meaning of home; Patient empowerment; Autonomy; MINI-MENTAL-STATE; ASSESSMENT-TOOL; CAPACITY; CONSENT; COMPETENCE; DIRECTIVES; CAREGIVERS;
D O I
10.1186/s12910-023-00905-0
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, and the reformed guardianship law in Germany, require that persons with a disability, including people with dementia in Alzheimer's disease (PwAD), are supported in making self-determined decisions. This support is achieved through communication. While content-related communication is a deficit of PwAD, relational aspects of communication are a resource. Research in supported decision-making (SDM) has investigated the effectiveness of different content-related support strategies for PwAD but has only succeeded in improving understanding, which, although one criterion of capacity to consent, is not sufficient to ensure overall capacity to consent. The aim of the 'spatial intervention study' of the DECIDE project is to examine an innovative resource-oriented SDM approach that focuses on relational aspects. We hypothesise that talking to PwAD in their familiar home setting (as opposed to a clinical setting) will reduce the complexity of the decision-making process and enhance overall capacity to consent.Methods People with a suspected or confirmed diagnosis of dementia in Alzheimer's disease will be recruited from two memory clinics (N = 80). We will use a randomised crossover design to investigate the intervention effect of the decision-making place on capacity to consent. Besides reasoning capacity, which is part of overall capacity to consent and will be the primary outcome, various secondary outcomes (e.g., other aspects of capacity to consent, subjective task complexity, decisional conflict) and suspected moderating or mediating variables (e.g., meaning of home, demographic characteristics) will be assessed.Discussion The results of the study will be used to develop a new SDM strategy that is based on relational resources for PwAD. If a change in location achieves the anticipated improvement in capacity to consent, future research should focus on implementing this SDM strategy in a cost-effective manner in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Project DECIDE, part II: decision-making places for people with dementia in Alzheimer’s disease: supporting advance decision-making by improving person-environment fit
    Janina Florack
    Christina Abele
    Stefanie Baisch
    Simon Forstmeier
    Daniel Garmann
    Martin Grond
    Ingmar Hornke
    Tarik Karakaya
    Jonas Karneboge
    Boris Knopf
    Gregor Lindl
    Tanja Müller
    Frank Oswald
    Nathalie Pfeiffer
    David Prvulovic
    Aoife Poth
    Andreas Reif
    Irene Schmidtmann
    Anna Theile-Schürholz
    Heiko Ullrich
    Julia Haberstroh
    [J]. BMC Medical Ethics, 24
  • [2] Decision-Making Support for People With Alzheimer's Disease: A Narrative Review
    Sun, Weiyi
    Matsuoka, Teruyuki
    Narumoto, Jin
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [3] Decision-making on behalf of people living with dementia: how do surrogate decision-makers decide?
    Fetherstonhaugh, Deirdre
    McAuliffe, Linda
    Bauer, Michael
    Shanley, Chris
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2017, 43 (01) : 35 - 40
  • [4] Capacity for decision-making in Alzheimer's disease: selfhood, positioning and semiotic people
    Sabat, SR
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2005, 39 (11-12): : 1030 - 1035
  • [5] Professionals' views and experiences in supporting decision-making involvement for people living with dementia
    Sinclair, Craig
    Bajic-Smith, Julie
    Gresham, Meredith
    Blake, Meredith
    Bucks, Romola S.
    Field, Sue
    Clayton, Josephine M.
    Radoslovich, Helen
    [J]. DEMENTIA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2021, 20 (01): : 84 - 105
  • [6] Improving Shared Decision-Making for Women with Parkinson's Disease
    Fullard, Michelle
    Morris, Megan
    Dafoe, Ashley
    Shelton, Erika
    Kern, Drew
    Matlock, Dan
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2023, 100 (17)
  • [8] Decision-making with explicit and stable rules in mild Alzheimer's disease
    Delazer, M.
    Sinz, H.
    Zamarian, L.
    Benke, T.
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2007, 45 (08) : 1632 - 1641
  • [9] Decision-Making Competence in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease: A Review of the Literature
    Gaubert, Fanny
    Chainay, Hanna
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2021, 31 (02) : 267 - 287
  • [10] Decision-Making Competence in Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease: A Review of the Literature
    Fanny Gaubert
    Hanna Chainay
    [J]. Neuropsychology Review, 2021, 31 : 267 - 287