Lumbar and pelvis movement comparison between cross-court and long-line topspin forehand in table tennis: based on musculoskeletal model

被引:3
|
作者
He, Yuqi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Liang, Minjun [1 ,4 ]
Fang, Yufei [1 ]
Fekete, Gusztav [3 ]
Baker, Julien S. [5 ]
Gu, Yaodong [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Ningbo 2 Hosp, Res Acad Med Combining Sports, Ningbo, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Pannonia, Fac Engn, Veszprem, Hungary
[3] Eotvos Lorand Univ, Savaria Inst Technol, Szombathely, Hungary
[4] Ningbo Univ, Fac Sports Sci, Ningbo, Peoples R China
[5] Hong Kong Baptist Univ, Dept Sport Phys Educ & Hlth, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
pelvis rotation; lumbar movement; opensim; musculoskeletal model; trunk rotation; topspin forehand; table tennis; PERFORMANCE-LEVEL; BACKHAND; KINEMATICS; ELITE; LIMB; ROTATION; KINETICS; PLAYERS; JOINTS;
D O I
10.3389/fbioe.2023.1185177
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Introduction: Cross-court and the long-line topspin forehand is the common and basic stroke skill in table tennis. The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences in lumbar and pelvis movements between cross-court and long-line topspin forehand strokes in table tennis based on musculoskeletal demands using OpenSim. Materials and Methods: The eight-camera Vicon system and Kistler force platform were used to measure kinematics and kinetics in the lumbar and pelvis movement of sixteen participants (Weight: 69.89 +/- 1.58 kg; Height: 1.73 +/- 0.03 m; Age: 22.89 +/- 2.03 years; BMI: 23.45 +/- 0.69 kg/m(2); Experience: 8.33 +/- 0.71 years) during cross-court and long-line topspin forehand play. The data was imputed into OpenSim providing the establishment of the Giat2392 musculoskeletal model for simulation. One-dimensional statistical parametric mapping and independent samples t-test was performed in MATLAB and SPSS to analyze the kinematics and kinetics. Results: The results show that the range of motion, peak moment, and maximum angle of the lumbar and pelvis movement in cross-court play were significantly higher than in the long-line stroke play. The moment of long-line in the sagittal and frontal plane was significantly higher than cross-court play in the early stroke phase. Conclusion: The lumbar and pelvis embody greater weight transfer and greater energy production mechanisms when players performed cross-court compared to long-line topspin forehand. Beginners could enhance their motor control strategies in forehand topspin skills and master this skill more easily based on the results of this study.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] A kinematic comparison between long-line and cross-court top spin forehand in competitive table tennis players
    Lanzoni, Ivan Malagoli
    Bartolomei, Sandro
    Di Michele, Rocco
    Fantozzi, Silvia
    JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, 2018, 36 (23) : 2637 - 2643
  • [2] Biomechanical Comparison between Down-the-Line and Cross-Court Topspin Backhand in Competitive Table Tennis
    Xing, Kaige
    Hang, Lanping
    Lu, Zijun
    Mao, Chuangui
    Kang, Dong
    Yang, Chen
    Sun, Yuliang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (09)
  • [3] Lower Limb Muscle Forces in Table Tennis Footwork during Topspin Forehand Stroke Based on the OpenSim Musculoskeletal Model: A Pilot Study
    He, Yuqi
    Shao, Shirui
    Fekete, Gusztáv
    Yang, Xiaoyi
    Cen, Xuanzhen
    Song, Yang
    Sun, Dong
    Gu, Yaodong
    MCB Molecular and Cellular Biomechanics, 2022, 19 (04): : 221 - 235
  • [4] Evaluation of Upper Limb Joint Contribution to Racket Head Speed in Elite Tennis Players Using IMU Sensors: Comparison between the Cross-Court and Inside-Out Attacking Forehand Drive
    Pedro, Bruno
    Joao, Filipa
    Lara, Jerusa P. R.
    Cabral, Silvia
    Carvalho, Joao
    Veloso, Antonio P.
    SENSORS, 2022, 22 (03)