Lottery preference, short-sale constraint, and the salience effect: Evidence from China

被引:3
|
作者
Liu, Chang [1 ]
Sun, Peng [1 ]
Zhu, Dongming [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Econ, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Jinan Univ, Dept Finance, Sch Econ, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Jinan Univ, Inst Financial Res, Sch Econ, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Salience effect; Lottery preference; Short-sale constraint; Chinese stock market; STOCK RETURNS EVIDENCE; CROSS-SECTION; GAMBLING PREFERENCE; PROSPECT-THEORY; NEWS; PROFITABILITY; ATTENTION; MOMENTUM; LIMITS; SIZE;
D O I
10.1016/j.econmod.2023.106341
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper documents the significant and robust salience theory (ST) effect in China, which differs from the findings in the literature. First, the upside-ST effect from stocks with salient upsides is stronger than the downside-ST effect from stocks with salient downsides; the opposite pattern is documented in the US market. We demonstrate that this pattern is due to strong lottery preference and short-sale constraint in China, where in-vestors are prone to engage in salient thinking when they bet on lottery stocks; meanwhile, short-sale constraint prevents rational investors from correcting salience-induced mispricing. Second, the salience effect remains strong in big stocks and high institutional ownership stocks. Our findings are consistent with the existing evi-dence that fund managers cater to fund investors' lottery preferences to hold lottery stocks. Our study provides new insights into the sources of the salience effect in China, especially salience's interaction with investor be-haviors and the market's institutional characteristics.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Short-sale refinancing and earnings response coefficient: evidence from China
    Liu, Tingli
    Jiang, Ying
    Hao, Lizhong
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2021, 29 (01) : 127 - 146
  • [2] The effect of short-sale restrictions: another perspective
    Le, Van
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGERIAL FINANCE, 2016, 12 (05) : 700 - 714
  • [3] Short-sale inflow and stock returns: Evidence from Japan
    Takahashi, Hidetomo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2010, 34 (10) : 2403 - 2412
  • [4] An examination of heterogeneous beliefs with a short-sale constraint in a dynamic economy
    Gallmeyer, Michael
    Hollifield, Burton
    [J]. REVIEW OF FINANCE, 2008, 12 (02) : 323 - 364
  • [5] Short-Sale Constraints and Options Trading: Evidence from Reg SHO
    Chen, Yi-Wen
    Chen, Sheng-Syan
    Chou, Robin K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, 2020, 55 (05) : 1555 - 1579
  • [6] Short-sale constraints and cross-predictability: Evidence from Chinese market
    Li, Rui
    Li, Chenchen
    Yuan, Jinjian
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2022, 80 : 166 - 176
  • [7] Short-sale deregulation and corporate tax aggressiveness: evidence from the Chinese market
    Cao, Yue
    Dong, Yizhe
    Guo, Tianxiao
    Ma, Diandian
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2022, 28 (4-5): : 326 - 355
  • [8] Short-sale constraints and firm investment efficiency: Evidence from a natural experiment
    Chen, Zhihong
    Fu, Siwen
    Wang, Ke
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2023, 42 (06)
  • [9] Short-Sale Restrictions and Price Clustering: Evidence from SEC Rule 201
    Davis, Ryan L.
    Jurich, Stephen N.
    Roseman, Brian S.
    Watson, Ethan D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH, 2018, 54 (03) : 345 - 367
  • [10] Short-Sale Restrictions and Price Clustering: Evidence from SEC Rule 201
    Ryan L. Davis
    Stephen N. Jurich
    Brian S. Roseman
    Ethan D. Watson
    [J]. Journal of Financial Services Research, 2018, 54 : 345 - 367