Digital innovation's contribution to sustainability transitions

被引:19
|
作者
Makitie, Tuukka [1 ,2 ]
Hanson, Jens [1 ]
Damman, Sigrid [1 ]
Wardeberg, Mari [1 ]
机构
[1] SINTEF Digital, Dept Technol Management, Oslo, Norway
[2] Forskningsveien, N-0373 Oslo, Norway
关键词
Twin transition; Socio-technical transition; Digitalization; Radical innovation; Incremental innovation; Structural change; TECHNOLOGICAL DISCONTINUITIES; SYSTEM RECONFIGURATION; SOCIOTECHNICAL SYSTEMS; MULTILEVEL ANALYSIS; INCUMBENT FIRMS; ENERGY; MODEL; PERSPECTIVE; CHALLENGES; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102255
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
Digital innovation is increasingly mentioned as a potential key contributor to sustainability transitions. However, there has been little theoretical discussion of this topic. In this conceptual paper, the authors draw on literature on both sustainability transition studies and innovation studies to explore critically the contribution of digital innovation in sustainability transitions. They conceptualize transitions as fundamental changes in patterns of production and consumption, such as those relating to energy. Radical innovation leads to changes in the structure of socio-technical systems underlying such patterns, while incremental innovation contributes to maintaining the structure and current patterns. The authors suggest that digital innovations may contribute positively to sustainability transitions through couplings with sustainable innovations. They propose the following typology of such couplings: incremental twin innovations, sustainability supported digital innovations, digitally supported sustainable innovations, and radical twin innovations. Radical twin innovations may possess the greatest potential for sustainability transitions, as they are linked to structural change and thus open new pathways for sustainability transitions, whereas incremental twin innovations merely optimize current unsustainable systems. The typology is illustrated with examples from shipping and from electricity systems, and some of the complexities of twin transitions encountered by researchers and practitioners alike are discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] New competences enhancing Procurement's contribution to innovation and sustainability
    Beske-Janssen, Philip
    Johnsen, Thomas
    Constant, Francois
    Wieland, Andreas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PURCHASING AND SUPPLY MANAGEMENT, 2023, 29 (03)
  • [2] Corpoica's contribution to the national competitiveness, sustainability and innovation agenda
    Restrepo Ibiza, Juan Lucas
    [J]. REVISTA COLOMBIANA DE CIENCIAS PECUARIAS, 2013, 26 : 243 - 246
  • [3] Rethinking bioeconomy innovation in sustainability transitions
    Losacker, Sebastian
    Heiden, Stefanie
    Liefner, Ingo
    Lucas, Henning
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2023, 74
  • [4] Mobilizing innovation for sustainability transitions: A comment on transformative innovation policy
    Fagerberg, Jan
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2018, 47 (09) : 1568 - 1576
  • [5] Pinning it down? Measuring innovation for sustainability transitions
    Krlev, Gorgi
    Terstriep, Judith
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND SOCIETAL TRANSITIONS, 2022, 45 : 270 - 288
  • [6] Innovation intermediaries accelerating environmental sustainability transitions
    Gliedt, Travis
    Hoicka, Christina E.
    Jackson, Nathan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 174 : 1247 - 1261
  • [7] Environmental Innovation and Sustainability Transitions in Regional Studies
    Truffer, Bernhard
    Coenen, Lars
    [J]. REGIONAL STUDIES, 2012, 46 (01) : 1 - 21
  • [8] Transitions towards sustainability through system innovation
    Elzen, B
    Wieczorek, A
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2005, 72 (06) : 651 - 661
  • [9] Innovation, digital transformation and sustainability in industry
    de Moraes, Bruno Rodrigues
    [J]. O Papel, 2022, 83 (09):
  • [10] Competing innovation systems and the need for redeployment in sustainability transitions
    Magnusson, Thomas
    Berggren, Christian
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2018, 126 : 217 - 230