Ultrasound Radiomics Features to Identify Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Retrospective, Single-Center Study

被引:5
|
作者
Cai, Lie [1 ]
Sidey-Gibbons, Chris [2 ,3 ]
Nees, Juliane [1 ]
Riedel, Fabian [1 ]
Schaefgen, Benedikt [1 ]
Togawa, Riku [1 ]
Killinger, Kristina [1 ]
Heil, Joerg [1 ]
Pfob, Andre [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
Golatta, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Neuenheimer Feld 440, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, MD Anderson Ctr INSPiRED Canc Care Integrated Syst, Houston, TX USA
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Symptom Res, Houston, TX USA
[4] Natl Ctr Tumor Dis NCT, Heidelberg, Germany
[5] German Canc Res Ctr, Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
breast cancer; diagnostic imaging; machine learning; neoadjuvant systemic treatment; triple-negative breast cancer; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1002/jum.16377
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
ObjectivesPatients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) exhibit a fast tumor growth rate and poor survival outcomes. In this study, we aimed to develop and compare intelligent algorithms using ultrasound radiomics features in addition to clinical variables to identify patients with TNBC prior to histopathologic diagnosis.MethodsWe used single-center, retrospective data of patients who underwent ultrasound before histopathologic verification and subsequent neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NAST). We developed a logistic regression with an elastic net penalty algorithm using pretreatment ultrasound radiomics features in addition to patient and tumor variables to identify patients with TNBC. Findings were compared to the histopathologic evaluation of the biopsy specimen. The main outcome measure was the area under the curve (AUC).ResultsWe included 1161 patients, 813 in the development set and 348 in the validation set. Median age was 50.1 years and 24.4% (283 of 1161) had TNBC. The integrative model using radiomics and clinical information showed significantly better performance in identifying TNBC compared to the radiomics model (AUC: 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65-0.76 versus 0.64, 95% CI: 0.57-0.71, P = .004). The five most important variables were cN status, shape surface volume ratio (SA:V), gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) correlation, gray level dependence matrix (GLDM) dependence nonuniformity normalized, and age. Patients with TNBC were more often categorized as BI-RADS 4 than BI-RADS 5 compared to non-TNBC patients (P = .002).ConclusionA machine learning algorithm showed promising potential to identify patients with TNBC using ultrasound radiomics features and clinical information prior to histopathologic evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:467 / 478
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ultrasound Radiomics Features to Identify Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Hu, Zhe
    Qin, Yuanlin
    Liu, Fengli
    Wang, Yuhong
    Liu, Shangkuan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2024,
  • [2] Outcomes of patients with triple-negative breast cancer compared to non-triple negative breast cancer: A single-center study.
    Hamm, Caroline M.
    El-Masri, Maher
    Gupta, Rasna
    Kulkarni, Swati
    Ghafoor, Akmal
    Vivek, Pamathy
    Mathews, John
    Alam, Yasmin
    Elfiki, Tarek A.
    Kanjeekal, Sindu Mary
    Schneider, Ken
    Pan, Ming
    Hirmiz, Khalid
    Springer, Colvin
    Yousuf, Junaid
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (15)
  • [3] A retrospective single-center study investigating the clinical significance of grade in triple-negative breast cancer.
    Hamm, Caroline M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 38 (15)
  • [4] Risk factors and prognostic factors of brain metastasis of triple-negative breast cancer: A single-center retrospective study
    He, Chunyu
    Mamuti, Guliqihere
    Mushajiang, Munire
    Maimatiniyazi, Simayili
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2024, 20 (04)
  • [5] Clinicopathologic features and survival of Filipino women with triple-negative breast cancer: A single-center experience
    Ando, Mark M.
    Uson, Arnold John B.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2021, 32 : S307 - S307
  • [6] Radiomics features to identify distinct subtypes of triple-negative breast cancers.
    Itakura, Haruka
    Ikeda, Debra M.
    Okamoto, Satoko
    Chen, Shu-Tian
    Rister, Blaine
    Gude, Dev
    Mattonen, Sarah A.
    Alkim, Emel
    Todderud, Julia
    Schueler, Emil
    Rubin, Daniel
    Sledge, George W.
    Kurian, Allison W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 37 (15)
  • [7] Mammography and ultrasound features of triple-negative breast cancer
    Kojima, Yasuyuki
    Tsunoda, Hiroko
    [J]. BREAST CANCER, 2011, 18 (03) : 146 - 151
  • [8] Mammography and ultrasound features of triple-negative breast cancer
    Yasuyuki Kojima
    Hiroko Tsunoda
    [J]. Breast Cancer, 2011, 18 : 146 - 151
  • [9] Clinical and pathological characteristics of triple-negative breast cancer patients: A single-center experience.
    Akdeniz, Aydan
    Yalcin, Selim
    Rahatli, Samed
    Kucukoztas, Nadire
    Yagmurdur, Mahmut Can
    Dizdar, Omer
    Altundag, Ozden
    Ozyilkan, Ozgur
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (15)
  • [10] Translational relevance of HER2-low expression in triple-negative breast cancer: A retrospective single-center study.
    Mufti, Suhail Sayeed
    Sanghavi, Niyati
    Ramaswamy, Veena
    Naik, Radheshyam
    Ajaikumar, Basavalinga Sadasivaiah
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 40 (16)