Efficacy and safety of ibuprofen gargle for postoperative pain after mandibular third molar extraction: A phase II, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized crossover trial

被引:1
|
作者
Ioroi, Takeshi [1 ]
Kakei, Yasumasa [2 ]
Ito, Takahiro [1 ]
Shirai, Tatsuya [2 ]
Okazaki, Yutaro [1 ]
Hasegawa, Takumi [2 ]
Akashi, Masaya [2 ]
Yano, Ikuko [1 ]
机构
[1] Kobe Univ Hosp, Dept Pharm, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
[2] Kobe Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
来源
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
ibuprofen; molar; mouthwashes; postoperative pain; third; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; SPLIT-MOUTH; ACETAMINOPHEN; TRISMUS; DICLOFENAC; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1002/cre2.821
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
ObjectiveThis study was designed to evaluate the postoperative efficacy and safety of using an ibuprofen gargle as a pain management strategy for patients who have undergone mandibular third molar extraction. We also ensured that the quality of treatment was not compromised throughout the study.Material and MethodsPatients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio into two groups: the ibuprofen-placebo (IP) group and the placebo-ibuprofen (PI) group. On postoperative Day (POD) 1, the IP group initiated ibuprofen administration, while the PI group started taking placebo. On POD 2, the IP group switched to using placebo, whereas the PI group switched to ibuprofen. From PODs 3-5, both groups were prescribed ibuprofen gargle. The primary endpoint was within-subject visual analog scale (VAS) score before and 5 min after the first use of the ibuprofen or placebo gargle on PODs 1 and 2 (Delta VAS5_ibuprofen - Delta VAS5_placebo). The incidence and severity of adverse events were assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 and a subjective rating scale.ResultsThis study enrolled 40 patients. The within-subject VAS5 of the IP and PI groups were 1.25 +/- 12.0 and -5.26 +/- 8.93 mm, respectively. The treatment effect of ibuprofen gargle was -2.01 +/- 10.62 mm (p = .246). None of the patients in each group presented with serious adverse events or clinically significant complications (including dry sockets) after extraction. Transient adverse events, such as throat tingling and oral discomfort (grade 1), were observed in each group.ConclusionIbuprofen gargle was safe but did not provide significant pain relief when used after mandibular third molar extraction.
引用
收藏
页码:1058 / 1068
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy of Ibuprofen Gargle for Postoperative Pain After Mandibular Third Molar Extraction: Protocol for a Phase II, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Randomized Crossover Trial
    Kakei, Yasumasa
    Ioroi, Takeshi
    Ito, Takahiro
    Okazaki, Yutaro
    Hasegawa, Takumi
    Yano, Ikuko
    Akashi, Masaya
    [J]. JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2022, 11 (05):
  • [2] Comparative analgesic efficacy and tolerability of celecoxib and tramadol on postoperative pain after mandibular third molar extraction: A double blind randomized controlled trial
    Akinbade, A. O.
    Ndukwe, K. C.
    Owotade, F. J.
    [J]. NIGERIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2019, 22 (06) : 796 - 800
  • [3] Efficacy and Safety of Additional 200-mg Dose of Celecoxib in Adult Patients With Postoperative Pain Following Extraction of Impacted Third Mandibular Molar: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase II Study in Japan
    Saito, Ken'ichi
    Kaneko, Akihiro
    Machii, Katsuyuki
    Ohta, Hiroyoshi
    Ohkura, Masayuki
    Suzuki, Makoto
    [J]. CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2012, 34 (02) : 314 - 328
  • [4] A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Ibuprofen Lysinate in Comparison to Ibuprofen Acid for Acute Postoperative Dental Pain
    Kyselovic, Jan
    Koscova, Eva
    Lampert, Anette
    Weiser, Thomas
    [J]. PAIN AND THERAPY, 2020, 9 (01) : 249 - 259
  • [5] Controlling postoperative pain after third molar extraction with a dexamethasone and articaine injection: a double-blind randomized controlled trial
    Abdelraziq, Murad
    Joachim, Michael V.
    Resnick, Cory M.
    Winocur, Ephraim
    Laviv, Amir
    Abu El-Naaj, Imad
    [J]. QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 54 (01): : 24 - 32
  • [6] Efficacy of postoperative oral metronidazole for haemorrhoidectomy pain: a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
    Wilkie, B. D.
    Chandra, R.
    Chua, J.
    Lam, D. C. S.
    Paratz, E. D.
    An, V
    Keck, J. O.
    [J]. COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2021, 23 (01) : 274 - 282
  • [7] Safety and Efficacy of Oral Nalbuphine on Postoperative Pain in Hemorrhoidectomy Patients A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Pivotal Trial
    Jao, Shu-Wen
    Hsiao, Koung-Hung
    Lin, Hua-Ching
    Lee, Chia-Cheng
    Lin, Tzu-Chen
    Chen, Wei-Shone
    Lin, Chun-Chi
    Lee, Tsai-Yu
    Jiang, Jeng-Kai
    Wu, Chang-Chieh
    Hu, Oliver Yoa-Pu
    [J]. CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2023, 39 (12): : 686 - 694
  • [8] EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF CREATINE SUPPLEMENTATION IN JUVENILE DERMATOMYOSITIS: A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED CROSSOVER TRIAL
    Solis, Marina Yazigi
    Hayashi, Ana Paula
    Artioli, Guilherme Giannini
    Roschel, Hamilton
    Sapienza, Marcelo Tatit
    Otaduy, Maria Concepcion
    De Sa Pinto, Ana Lucia
    Silva, Clovis Artur
    Elias Sallum, Adriana Maluf
    Pereira, Rosa Maria R.
    Gualano, Bruno
    [J]. MUSCLE & NERVE, 2016, 53 (01) : 58 - 66
  • [9] Intranasal Ketorolac for Pain Secondary to Third Molar Impaction Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
    Grant, George M.
    Mehlisch, Donald R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2010, 68 (05) : 1025 - 1031
  • [10] Beneficial effect of methylprednisolone after mandibular third molar surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled split-mouth trial
    Stephan Acham
    Arnold Klampfl
    Astrid Truschnegg
    Robert Kirmeier
    Andreas Sandner-Kiesling
    Norbert Jakse
    [J]. Clinical Oral Investigations, 2013, 17 : 1693 - 1700