New beginnings: The right to equality and early childhood care and education

被引:0
|
作者
Fredman, Sandra [1 ,4 ]
Donati, Georgina [2 ]
Naicker, Sara [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Pembroke Coll, Fac Law, Oxford, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Dept Psychiat, Warneford Hosp, Oxford, England
[3] Univ Witwatersrand, DSI NRF Ctr Excellence Human Dev, Johannesburg, South Africa
[4] Pembroke Coll, Oxford OX1 1DW, England
关键词
Early childhood care and education; sustainable development goals; Convention on the Rights of the Child; International Convention on Economic Social and Cultural Rights; Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; equality; SUBSTANTIVE EQUALITY; MATERNAL EDUCATION; ATTAINMENT; INEQUALITY; GENDER;
D O I
10.1080/02587203.2023.2214372
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
While South Africa has seen important advances in the provision of early childhood care and education (ECCE), about 3.2 million children still lack access to any programme. Problems of access and quality are most pronounced in the poorest communities. Even before Covid-19 forced many providers to close, these programmes were overcrowded, with poor infrastructure, and an under-paid and under-qualified workforce. ECCE is crucial for a child's development, meaning that these inequalities are amplified in school and later life. This has knock-on effects for caregivers, particularly women, and their ability to access quality work. This article argues that the right to equality can be mobilised both in relation to the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 and international law to address these disparities. By using a framework of substantive equality, we conclude that poverty, gender and race are potential grounds for discrimination both directly and indirectly. We further propose that resource-based justifications for limiting this right are unacceptable when budgets permit unequal resource distribution and contravene a government's positive duty to fulfil the right to equality.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 191
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条