Transcranial direct current stimulation for upper extremity spasticity rehabilitation in stroke survivors: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials

被引:16
|
作者
Alashram, Anas R. [1 ]
Padua, Elvira [2 ]
Aburub, Aseel [1 ]
Raju, Manikandan [3 ]
Annino, Giuseppe [4 ]
机构
[1] Isra Univ, Dept Physiotherapy, Amman, Jordan
[2] San Raffaele Roma Open Univ, Dept Human Sci & Promot Qual Life, Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Sapienza, Dept Neurosci Umane, Clin Expt Neurosci & Psychol, Rome, Italy
[4] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Dept Med Syst, Rome, Italy
关键词
NONINVASIVE BRAIN-STIMULATION; FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; VIRTUAL-REALITY THERAPY; SPINAL-CORD-INJURY; NEUROREHABILITATION; MANAGEMENT; EPIDEMIOLOGY; INDIVIDUALS; LIMITATIONS; MECHANISMS;
D O I
10.1002/pmrj.12804
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objectives To examine the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on upper extremity spasticity after stroke and to define the most effective tDCS parameters. Literature Survey Systematic review in the following databases: PubMed, SCOPUS, PEDro, CINAHL, MEDLINE, REHABDATA, AMED, and Web of Science databases. Studies up to June 2020 were included. Methodology Studies were included if the sample was composed of individuals with stroke, the intervention followed a tDCS intervention (alone or combined with another intervention), and the study was a randomized controlled trial including at least one measurement assessing upper extremity spasticity. Two authors independently screened the included studies. Conflicting decisions between authors were resolved by discussion with the third author. The methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool. The authors determined that the meta-analysis was not feasible due to the heterogeneity in the protocols among the included studies. Synthesis After the screening of 1204 records, a total of seven studies met the specified inclusion criteria and involved 320 participants (mean age = 60.3), 31.1% of whom were females. Patients with ischemic stroke comprised 77.2% of the total patients, and 42.2% were with right hemispheric stroke. Six studies exhibited "high" quality and one exhibited "moderate" quality. Five of the selected studies that combined the tDCS intervention and other traditional interventions showed a significant reduction in upper extremity spasticity after stroke following tDCS intervention. The other two studies that delivered tDCs alone did not show a significant difference. Conclusions The evidence for the effect of tDCS on upper extremity spasticity after stroke was limited. The optimal tDCS treatment dosage remains unclear. Additional studies with large sample sizes and long-term follow-up are strongly warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:222 / 234
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation for upper extremity function after ischemic stroke: A systematic review of parallel randomized clinical trials
    Yu, Liqiang
    Chen, Han
    Chen, Chaiying
    Lin, Yang
    Huang, Zhuofan
    Wang, Jianhong
    Chen, Qiaoling
    JOURNAL OF STROKE & CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2025, 34 (01):
  • [2] Transcranial direct current stimulation for cognitive rehabilitation in people with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials
    Alashram, Anas R.
    APPLIED NEUROPSYCHOLOGY-ADULT, 2025,
  • [3] Multiple sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation and upper extremity rehabilitation in stroke: A review and meta-analysis
    Triccas, L. Tedesco
    Burridge, J. H.
    Hughes, A. M.
    Pickering, R. M.
    Desikan, M.
    Rothwell, J. C.
    Verheyden, G.
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2016, 127 (01) : 946 - 955
  • [4] Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Upper Extremity Spasticity Post-Stroke: A Systematic Review
    Alashram, Anas R.
    Padua, Elvira
    Romagnoli, Cristian
    Raju, Manikandan
    Annino, Giuseppe
    PHYSIKALISCHE MEDIZIN REHABILITATIONSMEDIZIN KURORTMEDIZIN, 2022, 54 (03) : 136 - 145
  • [5] Transcranial direct current stimulation in neglect rehabilitation after stroke: a systematic review
    B. González-Rodriguez
    N. Serradell-Ribé
    R. Viejo-Sobera
    J. P. Romero-Muñoz
    Elena M. Marron
    Journal of Neurology, 2022, 269 : 6310 - 6329
  • [6] Transcranial direct current stimulation in neglect rehabilitation after stroke: a systematic review
    Gonzalez-Rodriguez, B.
    Serradell-Ribe, N.
    Viejo-Sobera, R.
    Romero-Munoz, J. P.
    Marron, Elena M.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2022, 269 (12) : 6310 - 6329
  • [7] A systematic review of upper extremity outcome measures assessed in randomized controlled trials of post stroke upper extremity rehabilitation over time
    Teasell, Robert
    Mehrabi, Sarvenaz
    Saikaley, Marcus
    George, Catherine
    Dukelow, Sean P.
    Harnett, Amber
    Fleet, Jamie L.
    TOPICS IN STROKE REHABILITATION, 2025, 32 (03) : 307 - 322
  • [8] Transcranial direct current stimulation for post-stroke dysphagia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Marchina, Sarah
    Pisegna, Jessica M.
    Massaro, Joseph M.
    Langmore, Susan E.
    McVey, Courtney
    Wang, Jeffrey
    Kumar, Sandeep
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2021, 268 (01) : 293 - 304
  • [9] Transcranial direct current stimulation for post-stroke dysphagia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Sarah Marchina
    Jessica M. Pisegna
    Joseph M. Massaro
    Susan E. Langmore
    Courtney McVey
    Jeffrey Wang
    Sandeep Kumar
    Journal of Neurology, 2021, 268 : 293 - 304
  • [10] The Effect of Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Motor Learning: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Kumari, Nitika
    Taylor, Denise
    Signal, Nada
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 13