Social acceptance of geothermal technology on a global view: a systematic review

被引:4
|
作者
Renoth, Robin [1 ,2 ]
Buchner, Elmar [1 ]
Schmieder, Martin [1 ]
Keim, Maximilian [3 ]
Plechaty, Manfred [1 ]
Drews, Michael [2 ]
机构
[1] Neu Ulm Univ Appl Sci, Wileystr 1, D-89231 Neu Ulm, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Munich, Arcisstr 21, D-80333 Munich, Germany
[3] Stadtwerke Munchen GmbH, Emmy Noether Str 2, D-80992 Munich, Germany
关键词
Geothermal energy; Community acceptance; Induced seismicity; Renewable energy; Energy transition; Environmental impact; SOCIETAL ACCEPTANCE; ENERGY TECHNOLOGY; BARRIERS; POLICY;
D O I
10.1186/s13705-023-00432-1
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe role of geothermal technology in the context of global efforts toward carbon-free and clean energy production is becoming increasingly important. Social acceptance is a decisive factor in the successful implementation of geothermal projects.Main textThis systematic review summarizes the major aspects and evaluates the crucial outcomes of recent research on community acceptance as a dimension of social acceptance of geothermal technology since 2011, on a global scale. From the literature, we identified and grouped researched acceptance factors into five main acceptance categories, namely 'project organization and process', 'environment', 'municipality', 'technology', and 'governance'. Each category comprises a number of specific acceptance factors addressed by different survey methods (e.g., interviews, questionnaires, content analyses) in the relevant publications. The acceptance factor categories 'technology' and 'governance' are remarkably underrepresented, whereas the acceptance factors combined in the categories 'project organization' and 'municipality' are frequently mentioned in the literature. Acceptance factors combined within the category 'environment', 'trust in key actors', and 'information about the project' are expectedly the most dominant ones in the papers studied. Interestingly, acceptance categories and number of mentions of acceptance factors are comparable in all survey methods applied in the various studies. Besides the acceptance factors combined in the categories 'environment' and 'project organization and process', 'knowledge about geothermal technology' (an acceptance factor from the category 'municipality') represents the predominant acceptance factor of geothermal technology.ConclusionsDeeper knowledge, in particular about the technical aspects of geothermal energy generation, might enable a more comprehensive and holistic view on geothermal technology. Furthermore, the integration of all relevant groups of stakeholders in the process of implementation of geothermal projects strongly influences their social acceptance. Following the results of our systematic literature review, we propose these aspects should be addressed in more detail in future research on the community acceptance of geothermal technology and energy production.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Social acceptance of geothermal technology on a global view: a systematic review
    Robin Renoth
    Elmar Buchner
    Martin Schmieder
    Maximilian Keim
    Manfred Plechaty
    Michael Drews
    [J]. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 13
  • [2] Geothermal technology in Australia: Investigating social acceptance
    Dowd, Anne-Maree
    Boughen, Naomi
    Ashworth, Peta
    Carr-Cornish, Simone
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (10) : 6301 - 6307
  • [3] Employing the technology acceptance model in social media: A systematic review
    Al-Qaysi, Noor
    Mohamad-Nordin, Norhisham
    Al-Emran, Mostafa
    [J]. EDUCATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2020, 25 (06) : 4961 - 5002
  • [4] Employing the technology acceptance model in social media: A systematic review
    Noor Al-Qaysi
    Norhisham Mohamad-Nordin
    Mostafa Al-Emran
    [J]. Education and Information Technologies, 2020, 25 : 4961 - 5002
  • [5] Technology Acceptance in Healthcare: A Systematic Review
    AlQudah, Adi A.
    Al-Emran, Mostafa
    Shaalan, Khaled
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (22):
  • [6] Global geothermal industry data collection: A systematic review
    Krieger, Margaret
    Kurek, Katarzyna A.
    Brommer, Marit
    [J]. GEOTHERMICS, 2022, 104
  • [7] What facilitates the acceptance of technology to promote social participation in later life? A systematic review
    Benoit-Dube, Laurence
    Jean, Eudia Kevine
    Aguilar, Melissa Arriola
    Zuniga, Ana-Marcia
    Bier, Nathalie
    Couture, Melanie
    Lussier, Maxime
    Lajoie, Xanthy
    Belchior, Patricia
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION-ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 18 (03) : 274 - 284
  • [8] Global COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance: A Systematic Review of Associated Social and Behavioral Factors
    Shakeel, Choudhary Sobhan
    Mujeeb, Amenah Abdul
    Mirza, Muhammad Shaheer
    Chaudhry, Beenish
    Khan, Saad Jawaid
    [J]. VACCINES, 2022, 10 (01)
  • [9] A systematic literature review of Smart Home Technology acceptance
    Daruwala, Neil
    Oberst, Ursula
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AMBIENT INTELLIGENCE AND SMART ENVIRONMENTS, 2023, 15 (02) : 115 - 142
  • [10] A Systematic Review of the Technology Acceptance Model in Health Informatics
    Rahimi, Bahlol
    Nadri, Hamed
    Afshar, Hadi Lotfnezhad
    Timpka, Toomas
    [J]. APPLIED CLINICAL INFORMATICS, 2018, 9 (03): : 604 - 634