Multi-criteria assessment of cropping systems for the sustainable intensification in the Pampas

被引:4
|
作者
Cano, Priscila B. [1 ]
Cabrini, Silvina M. [1 ,2 ]
Peper, Alberto M. [3 ]
Poggio, Santiago L. [4 ]
机构
[1] Inst Nacl Tecnol Agr INTA, Cervino St 3101, RA-C1425AGA Buenos Aires, Argentina
[2] Univ Nacl Noroeste Prov Buenos Aires UNNOBA, Libertad St 555, RA-B6000 Junin, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[3] Bayer Crop Sci, RP32, RA-2700 Pergamino, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[4] Univ Buenos Aires, Fac Agron, IFEVA, CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina
关键词
Agricultural intensification; Crop sequences; Cover crop; PROMETHEE; Rotation; Sustainability; NITROUS-OXIDE EMISSIONS; ECOLOGICAL INTENSIFICATION; COVER CROPS; SOIL CARBON; MANAGEMENT; PROMETHEE; AGRICULTURE; CORN;
D O I
10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103723
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
CONTEXT: The transformation of cropping systems towards sustainable intensification (SI) is essential in order to meet the demands of society. In the Pampas region of Argentina, most agricultural research has focused on crop ecophysiology and agronomic factors, although what seems to be lacking is an integrated evaluation of cropping systems to determine their alignment with SI trends. Multi-criteria analysis (MCDA) methods provide a formal framework to assess trade-offs between production and sustainability, rendering them useful for SI analysis. OBJECTIVE: This paper aims to compare and rank the cropping systems available in the rolling Pampas, the corn belt of Argentina, based on their alignment with SI trajectories, using the multi-criteria decision model "Pref-erence Ranking Organization Methods for Enrichment Evaluations" (PROMETHEE).METHODS: We used information from a mid-term experiment conducted in Pergamino, Buenos Aires, Argentina, to compare ten cropping systems over five consecutive years. These systems resulted from combining three crop sequences with either fallow or cover crops during the winter, and were grown using two different management practices. Sixteen economic, socioeconomic, and environmental criteria were defined to assess each of the cropping systems. We combined PROMETHEE with the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to compare the cropping systems. We considered two different decision-making profiles: one obtained through interviews with farmers, and the other based on interviews with agents involved in sustainable production systems at the Ministry of Agriculture of Argentina. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We ranked the cropping systems assessed according to how well they aligned with SI, the system that combines improving profits with reduced environmental impact. We found that the three-year rotation sequence of wheat/soybean-corn-soybean is the most aligned to the sustainable intensifica-tion option among the feasible crop sequences implemented in the rolling Pampas region. Furthermore, our results indicate that cover crops provide environmental benefits, but the associated costs discourage their implementation when the farmer profile focuses on maximizing economic benefits.SIGNIFICANCE: We emphasize the importance of integrally analyzing cropping systems. Our findings confirm the advantages noted in prior studies and provide a more thorough evaluation of wheat/soybean-corn-soybean three-year sequence. Finally, our work demonstrates the value of PROMETHEE multi-criteria analysis in assessing the SI of cropping systems. This tool could be a useful aid in facilitating discussions among farmers, consultants and other stakeholders, in the search for sustainable intensification pathways.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multi-criteria assessment of innovative cropping systems in French West Indies
    Feschet, P.
    Loeillet, D.
    Risede, J. M.
    [J]. X INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BANANA: ISHS - PROMUSA SYMPOSIUM ON AGROECOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO PROMOTE INNOVATIVE BANANA PRODUCTION SYSTEMS, 2018, 1196 : 187 - 194
  • [2] Multi-criteria assessment of sustainable mobility of employees
    Zenko, Bernard
    Znidarsic, Martin
    Kontic, Davor
    Bohanec, Marko
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DECISION SYSTEMS, 2024,
  • [3] MEACROS: a tool for multi-criteria evaluation of alternative cropping systems
    Mazzetto, F
    Bonera, R
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2003, 18 (3-4) : 379 - 387
  • [4] Multi-criteria assessment of sustainable envelop strategies' performances
    de Oliveiraa, Emma Carvalho
    Gognat, Leo
    [J]. CISBAT 2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE FUTURE BUILDINGS & DISTRICTS - ENERGY EFFICIENCY FROM NANO TO URBAN SCALE, 2017, 122 : 703 - 708
  • [5] Multi-criteria Evaluation of Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems
    Radinja, Matej
    Comas, Joaquim
    Corominas, Lluis
    Atanasova, Natasa
    [J]. NEW TRENDS IN URBAN DRAINAGE MODELLING, UDM 2018, 2019, : 269 - 274
  • [6] Assessing innovative cropping systems with DEXiPM, a qualitative multi-criteria assessment tool derived from DEXi
    Pelzer, Elise
    Fortino, Gabriele
    Bockstaller, Christian
    Angevin, Frederique
    Lamine, Claire
    Moonen, Camilla
    Vasileiadis, Vasileios
    Guerin, Daniel
    Guichard, Laurence
    Reau, Raymond
    Messean, Antoine
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2012, 18 : 171 - 182
  • [7] Sustainable Assessment of Public Works through a Multi-Criteria Framework
    Perlingeiro, Rogerio Moreno
    Pereira Lima Perlingeiro, Mayra Soares
    Chinelli, Christine Kowal
    Vazquez, Elaine Garrido
    Qualharini, Eduardo Linhares
    Haddad, Assed N.
    Hammad, Ahmed W. A.
    Pereira Soares, Carlos Alberto
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (17)
  • [8] Assessing benefits of land use intensification on extensive grain cropping systems of the Pampas
    Andrade, Jose F.
    Ermacora, Matias
    Satorre, Emilio H.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2022, 135
  • [9] Multi-Criteria Method for Sustainable Design of Energy Conversion Systems
    Mallard, Kathleen
    Debusschere, Vincent
    Garbuio, Lauric
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (16)
  • [10] A multi-criteria optimisation approach for the design of sustainable utility systems
    Papandreou, Vasilios
    Shang, Zhigang
    [J]. COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2008, 32 (07) : 1589 - 1602