Soda Taxes and Marketing Conduct

被引:3
|
作者
Keller, Kristopher O. [1 ]
Guyt, Jonne Y. [2 ]
Grewal, Rajdeep [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Kenan Flagler Business Sch, Chapel Hill, NC 27514 USA
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Business Sch, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ N Carolina, Kenan Flagler Business Sch, Mkt, Chapel Hill, NC USA
关键词
difference-in-differences; marketing conduct; marketing effectiveness; public health; soda tax; EXCISE TAXES; PRICE; MODEL; RETAILERS; OAKLAND; SEARCH; BRANDS;
D O I
10.1177/00222437231195551
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Soda taxes are an increasingly popular policy tool that discourages purchases of sugar-sweetened beverages. This study analyzes how emphasis on marketing conduct elements and their effectiveness might change after soda tax introductions. Prior studies on the effect of soda taxes focus on price increases but neglect other relevant marketing conduct tools (i.e., promotional frequency, promotional discount depth, and feature promotion frequency). This study documents the changes to marketing conduct elements and their effectiveness due to the introduction of soda tax across more than 200 retail stores in five markets. Findings related to price changes are consistent with prior literature; in addition, the study reveals a substantial, hitherto overlooked decrease in promotional frequency (-2%), promotional depth (-12%), and feature promotion frequency (-14%) compared with matched control markets, exacerbating the tax's negative sales effect. Introducing a soda tax also considerably influences the marketing conduct's effectiveness, such that consumers become less sensitive to changes in regular price, feature promotions, and the depth of the promotional discount but respond more to the presence of promotions. Importantly, marketing conduct and effectiveness changes do not align (e.g., while consumers become more sensitive to promotion frequency, managers often reduce them), a relevant insight for policy making.
引用
收藏
页码:393 / 410
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT IN TAXES
    COHEN, AH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTANCY, 1956, 101 (01): : 34 - 39
  • [2] Sixty seconds on ... soda taxes
    Gulland, Anne
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 355
  • [3] Where There's a Will: Can Highlighting Future Youth-Targeted Marketing Increase Support for Soda Taxes?
    Roh, Sungjong
    Schuldt, Jonathon P.
    [J]. HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 33 (12) : 1610 - 1613
  • [4] Soda Taxes, Obesity, and the Perils of Complexity
    Maddock, Jay E.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION, 2010, 25 (02) : 91 - 91
  • [5] How Well Targeted Are Soda Taxes?
    Dubois, Pierre
    Griffith, Rachel
    O'Connell, Martin
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2020, 110 (11): : 3661 - 3704
  • [6] Sentiment Analysis of Tweets on Soda Taxes
    An, Ruopeng
    Yang, Yuyi
    Batcheller, Quinlan
    Zhou, Qianzi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT AND PRACTICE, 2023, 29 (05): : 633 - 639
  • [7] The effect of soda taxes beyond beverages in Philadelphia
    Lozano-Rojas, Felipe
    Carlin, Patrick
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2022, 31 (11) : 2381 - 2410
  • [8] Tobacco Taxes vs Soda Taxes: A Case Study of a Framing Debate in Vermont
    Watts, Richard A.
    Heiss, Sarah
    Moser, Michael
    Kolodinsky, Jane
    Johnson, Rachel K.
    [J]. HEALTH BEHAVIOR AND POLICY REVIEW, 2014, 1 (03): : 191 - 196
  • [9] REGRESSIVE SIN TAXES, WITH AN APPLICATION TO THE OPTIMAL SODA TAX
    Allcott, Hunt
    Lockwood, Benjamin B.
    Taubinsky, Dmitry
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2019, 134 (03): : 1557 - 1626
  • [10] Commentary: Soda taxes, obesity, and the shifty behavior of consumers
    Edwards, Ryan D.
    [J]. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2011, 52 (06) : 417 - 418