The Impact and Implications of Regenerative Medicine in Urology

被引:0
|
作者
Abuharb, Abdullah I. [1 ]
Alzarroug, Abdullah F. [1 ]
Algahtani, Saad N. [1 ]
Alghamdi, Hatan K. [1 ]
Alosaimi, Fahad A. [1 ]
Alsuwayna, Nasser [1 ]
Almughira, Alwaleed I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic Univ, Coll Med, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
关键词
genitourinary surgery; safety; efficacy; urology; regenerative medicine; STRESS URINARY-INCONTINENCE; STEM-CELLS; ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION; PERIURETHRAL INJECTION; RAT MODEL; THERAPY;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.52264
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Urology focuses on the treatment of genitourinary disorders through therapies ranging from lifestyle changes to advanced surgeries; the field has recently incorporated robotic and minimally invasive technologies that have improved patient outcomes and reduced hospital stays and complications. However, these methods still have certain limitations. Regenerative medicine, focusing on natural repair abilities, can be an effective and safer alternative. This review aims to examine the impact of regenerative medicine in urology. We adopted a systematic review design by following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta -Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. An exhaustive online literature search involving the databases PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Google Scholar was conducted spanning the period between January 2010 and October 2023. Data were extracted from studies on regenerative medicine in urology with a special focus on efficacy and safety. Data from 16 studies were analyzed, which showed that cell therapy, biological materials, and tissue engineering are generally used in the field of urinary diseases. The main applications include the regeneration of urinary tissue, the correction of urinary incontinence, the treatment of erectile dysfunction, the reconstruction of ureteric defects, and the formation of bladder tissue. The study findings generally lack definitive conclusions on effectiveness and safety. While our results indicate that regenerative medicine is successful on a subjective level, more clinical trials are needed to establish its effectiveness and safety.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Regenerative medicine and urology
    Atala, A
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 92 : 58 - 67
  • [2] Regenerative medicine in urology
    Zhang, Chao
    Murphy, Sean V.
    Atala, Anthony
    [J]. SEMINARS IN PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2014, 23 (03) : 106 - 111
  • [3] Regenerative Medicine in Urology
    Garriboli, Massimo
    Radford, Anna
    Southgate, Jennifer
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2014, 24 (03) : 227 - 236
  • [4] Regenerative medicine in urology
    Wezel, Felix
    Southgate, Jennifer
    Thomas, David F. M.
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 108 (07) : 1046 - 1065
  • [5] Is regenerative medicine the future of urology?
    Zuckerman, Jack M.
    Nikolavsky, Dmitriy
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 38 (09) : 2073 - 2074
  • [6] Biomaterials and Regenerative Medicine in Urology
    Davis, N. F.
    Cunnane, E. M.
    Quinlan, M. R.
    Mulvihill, J. J.
    Lawrentschuk, N.
    Bolton, D. M.
    Walsh, M. T.
    [J]. CELL BIOLOGY AND TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, VOL 3: STEM CELLS, BIO-MATERIALS AND TISSUE ENGINEERING, 2018, 1107 : 189 - 198
  • [7] Is regenerative medicine the future of urology?
    Jack M. Zuckerman
    Dmitriy Nikolavsky
    [J]. World Journal of Urology, 2020, 38 : 2073 - 2074
  • [8] Regenerative Medicine and Tissue Engineering in Urology
    Atala, Anthony
    [J]. UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2009, 36 (02) : 199 - +
  • [9] Regenerative medicine: applications and development in urology
    Pinto, F.
    Calarco, A.
    Brescia, A.
    Sacco, E.
    D'Addessi, A.
    Racioppi, M.
    Bassi, P. F.
    [J]. UROLOGIA JOURNAL, 2007, 74 (04) : 197 - 205
  • [10] Impact of inflammation on the osteoarthritic niche: implications for regenerative medicine
    Williams, Emma L.
    Edwards, Christopher J.
    Cooper, Cyrus
    Oreffo, Richard O. C.
    [J]. REGENERATIVE MEDICINE, 2012, 7 (04) : 551 - 570