Histopathological Patterns and Outcomes of Triple-Positive Versus Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Study at a Tertiary Cancer Center

被引:0
|
作者
Kadi, Mai S. [1 ]
Alhebshi, Alhasan H. [2 ]
Shabkah, Alaa A. [2 ]
Alzahrani, Walaa A. [3 ]
Enani, Ghada N. [4 ]
Samkari, Ali A. [4 ]
Iskanderani, Omar [5 ]
Saleem, Abdulaziz M. [4 ]
Farsi, Ali H.
Trabulsi, Nora H. [4 ]
机构
[1] King Abdulaziz Univ, Fac Med, Dept Community Med, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[2] Int Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[3] King Faisal Specialist Hosp & Res Ctr, Dept Pediat, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[4] King Abdulaziz Univ, Fac Med, Dept Surg, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[5] King Abdulaziz Univ, Fac Med, Dept Radiol, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
关键词
progression-free survival; overall survival (os); triple-negative breast carcinoma; breast cancer outcomes; breast cancer research; LYMPHOVASCULAR INVASION; SURVIVAL; WOMEN;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.42389
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background One of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths in females under 45 years old is breast cancer (BC). The definition of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the lack of expression of estrogen receptors (ERs) as well as progesterone receptors (PRs) and Erb-B2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (HER2) gene amplification. Triple-positive breast cancer (TPBC), on the other hand, is defined as tumors expressing a high level of ER, PR, and HER2 receptors. This study aims to assess the phenotypes of TNBC and TPBC by comparing their individual clinical behavior patterns and prognosis throughout the course of the disease in a tertiary cancer center in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). MethodsOur study is a retrospective study using electronic medical records (EMRs) to identify all female patients diagnosed with BC using the International Classification of Diseases-10 (ICD-10) codes (between C50 and C50.9). About 1209 cases with primary BC female patients were recognized based on histopathology reports. Further subclassification into TPBC and TNBC was performed. Statistical analysis was performed using Rv3.6.2 (R Studio, version 3.5.2, Boston, MA, USA). The descriptive data were presented as means and standard deviations (SD). Survival curves were approximated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The comparison between survival curves between both groups was achieved using the log-rank test. The multivariate model was constructed based on the identified predictors using univariate analysis. ResultsUnivariate analysis of overall survival (OS) showed that mortality was higher in TNBC compared to TPBC (HR = 2.82, P-value <0.05). However, in a multivariate analysis, molecular subtypes did not show a significant effect on OS with a P-value of 0.94. We found that age at diagnosis has been associated with a 4% increase in mortality risk with a yearly rise in age. ConclusionIn this limited retrospective cohort study, we found that TNBC may not be associated with a higher risk of death than TPBC. However, other factors, including age at diagnosis, surgical intervention, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI), have been observed to increase the risk of mortality. On the other hand, patients with TNBC were found to have a worse prognosis in terms of local recurrence. This information cannot be generalized to all patients with BC given the limitations of this study. Further, larger cohorts are needed to explore biological and treatment-related outcomes in patients with TNBC and TPBC.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A retrospective comparison of the characteristics and recurrence outcome of triple-negative and triple-positive breast cancer
    Randhawa, Jaskirat Singh
    Venur, Vyshak Alva
    Kawsar, Hameem
    Spiro, Timothy Peter
    Haddad, Abdo S.
    Bagai, Rajesh Kumar
    Daw, Hamed
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (15)
  • [2] Expression and prognostic value of estrogen receptor β in patients with triple-negative and triple-positive breast cancer
    Guo, Liying
    Zhu, Qianwen
    Aisimutuola, Mulati
    Yilamu, Dilimina
    Liu, Sha
    Jakulin, Adina
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2015, 9 (06) : 2147 - 2150
  • [3] Completion of nipple reconstruction in triple-negative breast cancer patients compared to triple-positive breast cancer patients: A single institutional analysis
    Amaya, Joshua
    Jones, Kaitlin
    Haddock, Nicholas T.
    Teotia, Sumeet S.
    [J]. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2022, 31 (01)
  • [4] Finding the positive in triple-negative breast cancer
    Carey, Lisa A.
    [J]. NATURE CANCER, 2021, 2 (05) : 476 - 478
  • [5] Finding the positive in triple-negative breast cancer
    Lisa A. Carey
    [J]. Nature Cancer, 2021, 2 : 476 - 478
  • [6] RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF TRIPLE-NEGATIVE BREAST CANCER IN ONE HUNGARIAN CENTER
    Rubovszky, G.
    Horvath, Z.
    Lang, I.
    Kasler, M.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2010, 21 : 91 - 91
  • [7] Outcomes of patients with triple-negative breast cancer compared to non-triple negative breast cancer: A single-center study.
    Hamm, Caroline M.
    El-Masri, Maher
    Gupta, Rasna
    Kulkarni, Swati
    Ghafoor, Akmal
    Vivek, Pamathy
    Mathews, John
    Alam, Yasmin
    Elfiki, Tarek A.
    Kanjeekal, Sindu Mary
    Schneider, Ken
    Pan, Ming
    Hirmiz, Khalid
    Springer, Colvin
    Yousuf, Junaid
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (15)
  • [8] TIL's in triple-positive breast cancer
    Urezkova, M.
    Kudaybergenova, A.
    Semiglazova, T.
    Semiglazov, V.
    Tseluiko, A.
    Artemyeva, A.
    [J]. BREAST, 2021, 56 : S28 - S29
  • [9] Outcomes of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer In Older Versus Younger Women
    Munir, Asma
    Khawaja, Saira
    Khan, Sohail
    Sharaiha, Yousuf
    Huws, Anita M.
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH, 2023, 83 (05)
  • [10] Humanized mouse models of triple-negative and triple-positive breast cancer for preclinical validation of novel immuno-oncology therapies
    Kahkonen, T. E.
    Suominen, M. I.
    Halleen, J. M.
    Haapaniemi, T.
    Tanaka, A.
    Seiler, M.
    Bernoulli, J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2018, 92 : S7 - S8