Impact of sacubitril/valsartan and gliflozins on cardiac resynchronization therapy response in ischemic and non-ischemic heart failure patients

被引:2
|
作者
Fonderico, Celeste [1 ]
Pergola, Valerio [1 ]
Faccenda, Daniele [1 ]
Salucci, Alfonsomaria [1 ]
Comparone, Gianluigi [1 ]
Marrese, Aldo [1 ]
Ammirati, Giuseppe [1 ]
Cocchiara, Luigi [1 ]
Varriale, Alfonso [1 ]
Esposito, Giovanni [1 ]
Rapacciuolo, Antonio [1 ,2 ]
Strisciuglio, Teresa [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Adv Biomed Sci, Div Cardiol, Naples, Italy
[2] Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Adv Biomed Sci, Via S Pansini, 5, I-80131 Naples, Italy
关键词
Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor; Sodium -glucose co -transporter 2 inhibitors; DOPPLER-ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE; 2021 ESC GUIDELINES; ETIOLOGY; PREDICTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.131391
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims: Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNi) and sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) improve outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients, however their effects in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) recipients have been scarcely explored. This study investigated whether ARNi and SGLT2i 1) improve the rate of clinical and echocardiographic CRT response and 2) have different impact based on the ischemic or non-ischemic etiology. Methods: HFrEF patients referred for CRT implant were grouped in no treatment (group 1), only ARNi (group 2) and both ARNi and SGLT2i (group 3). Clinical and echocardiographic response were evaluated at 12 months. Results: A total of 178 patients were enrolled. At one-year follow-up, 74.4% patients in group 2 (p = 0.031) and 88.9% in group 3 (p = 0.014) were classified as clinical responders vs 54.5% in the no treatments group. In multivariable analysis, ARNi/SGLT2i use was an independent predictor of CRT response (OR 3.72; CI 95%, 1.40-10.98; p = 0.011), confirmed in both groups 2 and 3. At 12 months, the median Delta LVEF increase was 6% and 8.5% in groups 2 and 3 respectively, vs 4.5% in group 1 (p = 0.042 and p = 0.029) with significantly more echocardiographic responders in groups 2 and 3 (76% and 78% vs 50%, p = 0.003 and p = 0.036). Significantly more ischemic HFrEF patients than non-ischemic were considered clinical and echocardiographic responders in the treatment groups. Conclusions: ARNi alone or in combination with SGLT2i in CRT patients improves the clinical and echocardiographic response at 12 months. Ischemic patients seem to benefit more from these treatments.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Electrical remodelling post cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with ischemic and non-ischemic heart failure
    Ajaero, Chukwudiebube N.
    Ganesan, Anand
    Horowitz, John D.
    McGavigan, Andrew D.
    JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2019, 53 : 44 - 51
  • [2] Comparison of Resynchronization Therapy in Heart Failure Patients With Ischemic And Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy
    Baimbetov, Adil
    Yakupova, Ilinara
    Bizhanov, Kenzhebek
    Bozshagulov, Tungushbek
    Tursunkhanov, Zhalolkhan
    Bigeldiyev, Nurbolat
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 34 : S67 - S68
  • [3] Contrasting reverse remodeling in ischemic verses non-ischemic heart failure patients following cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Sutton, MS
    Plappert, T
    Hilpisch, KE
    CIRCULATION, 2003, 108 (17) : 629 - 629
  • [4] Time course of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy
    Marsan, Nina Ajmone
    Van de Veire, Nico R.
    Ypenburg, Claudia
    Bleeker, Gabe B.
    Holman, Eduard R.
    van der Wall, Ernst E.
    Schalij, Martin J.
    Bax, Jeroen J.
    CIRCULATION, 2007, 116 (16) : 545 - 545
  • [5] The value of cardiac sympathetic activity and mechanical dyssynchrony as cardiac resynchronization therapy response predictors: comparison between patients with ischemic and non-ischemic heart failure
    Anna I. Mishkina
    Victor V. Saushkin
    Tariel A. Atabekov
    Svetlana I. Sazonova
    Vladimir V. Shipulin
    Samia Massalha
    Roman E. Batalov
    Sergey V. Popov
    Konstantin V. Zavadovsky
    Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, 2023, 30 : 371 - 382
  • [6] The value of cardiac sympathetic activity and mechanical dyssynchrony as cardiac resynchronization therapy response predictors: comparison between patients with ischemic and non-ischemic heart failure
    Mishkina, Anna, I
    Saushkin, Victor V.
    Atabekov, Tariel A.
    Sazonova, Svetlana, I
    Shipulin, Vladimir V.
    Massalha, Samia
    Batalov, Roman E.
    Popov, Sergey, V
    Zavadovsky, Konstantin, V
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 30 (01) : 371 - 382
  • [7] Impact of scar tissue on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in ischemic heart failure patients
    Ypenburg, C.
    Schalij, M. J.
    Bleeker, G. B.
    Steendijk, P.
    Dibbets-Schneider, P.
    Stokkel, M. P. M.
    Van der Wall, E. E.
    Bax, J. J.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2006, 27 : 283 - 284
  • [8] Effects of sacubitril/valsartan on real-world patients with heart failure due to non-ischemic cardiomyopathy
    Hsu, C-Y
    Lin, Y-C
    Huang, C-Y
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2019, 21 : 407 - 408
  • [9] Twin peaks diversity with sacubitril/valsartan treatment responses in cardiomyopathic heart failure patients of non-ischemic compared to ischemic etiologies
    Chang, H. Y.
    Chiou, W. R.
    Lin, P. L.
    Hsu, C. Y.
    Liao, C. T.
    Lee, Y. H.
    Lin, C. C.
    Tsao, T. P.
    Yin, W. H.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2020, 41 : 1056 - 1056
  • [10] Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with ischemic versus non-ischemic heart failure: Differential effect of optimizing interventricular pacing interval
    Marsan, Nina Ajmone
    Bleeker, Gabe B.
    Van Bommel, Rutger J.
    Borleffs, Jan Willem
    Bertini, Matteo
    Holman, Eduard R.
    van der Wall, Ernst E.
    Schalij, Martin J.
    Bax, Jeroen J.
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2009, 158 (05) : 769 - 776