Comparative analysis of DRASTIC and GOD model for groundwater vulnerability assessment

被引:0
|
作者
Mehta, Darshan [1 ]
Patel, Priyank [2 ]
Sharma, Neeraj [3 ]
Eslamian, Saeid [4 ]
机构
[1] Dr S&S S Ghandhy Govt Engn Coll, Dept Civil Engn, Surat, Gujarat, India
[2] R N G Patel Inst Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Bardoli, Gujarat, India
[3] GIDC Degree Engn Coll, Navsari, Gujarat, India
[4] Isfahan Univ Technol, Coll Agr, Dept Water Engn, Esfahan, Iran
关键词
Analytic hierarchy process; DRASTIC model; Groundwater; Quality vulnerability; AQUIFER VULNERABILITY; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; INDEX METHOD; GIS; DISTRICT; AREA; POLLUTION; SYSTEM; CITY;
D O I
10.1007/s40808-023-01795-2
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Groundwater is one of the world's most important water resources, with varying quality and quantity. It is extremely difficult to recycle contaminated groundwater. As a result, protecting groundwater from contamination is critical. Climate change has made effective groundwater resource management a pressing concern, particularly in regions where water is in great demand for industrial and agricultural activity. The quality of the groundwater in the coastal area of Surat district is steadily reduced as a result of climate change, the usage of pesticides and fertilizers, and the increased sea level rise. The groundwater quality vulnerability presented in this study was simulated using a hybrid model that combined several parameter maps and a geographic information system. Government data are employed as the primary data in this study, and these data are reframed into the appropriate structure in GIS software. Groundwater Quality vulnerability is found by the effective factors and the parameter maps which are used as secondary data. In order to achieve this, a model was trained, optimized, and tested in the Arc-GIS Software. To run the model and to prepare the maps of the parameters Arc-GIS software was used. The primary benefit of GIS is how effectively it can combine data layers and modify the parameters used to classify vulnerabilities. Depth of water, Net recharge, Aquifer, Soil, Topography, Impact of the vadose zone, Hydraulic conductivity, land use, and land cover are the parameters to be considered for assessing the vulnerability using DRASTIC and modified DRASTIC model for the same. In the DRASTIC and Modified DRASTIC model all the parameters are weighted by the conventional weights. In the DRASTIC-AHP model, the weights of the DRASTIC parameters are modified using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. After employing all the models, the DRASTIC-AHP model gives the best results compared to all other models. Based on the study it is observed that the depth to the water table, net recharge, impact of the vadose zone, and aquifer media are the effective parameters that affect groundwater vulnerability. Vulnerability results are validated using the past year chloride concentration data. Based on the validation results from the DRASTIC-AHP model gives the best correlation. So, The DRASTIC-AHP model gives the best and most accurate results for the study area. According to the current situation of groundwater vulnerability and its quality, this research helps land use regulations and norms for activities related to recharge and seepage by describing the groundwater vulnerability in the studied region. So, this study helps policymakers and local authorities in taking protective measures for groundwater quality.
引用
收藏
页码:671 / 694
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative analysis of DRASTIC and GOD model for groundwater vulnerability assessment
    Darshan Mehta
    Priyank Patel
    Neeraj Sharma
    Saeid Eslamian
    [J]. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2024, 10 : 671 - 694
  • [2] Integrated assessment of groundwater pollution vulnerability in Goulmima: a comparative analysis of DRASTIC and GOD methods
    Lahssaine, Ismail Ait
    Kabiri, Lahcen
    Messaoudi, Badre
    Saadi, Youssef
    Essahlaoui, Ali
    Essafraoui, Badre
    Ouali, Lamya
    Kadiri, Abdelhakim
    [J]. EURO-MEDITERRANEAN JOURNAL FOR ENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRATION, 2024,
  • [3] Groundwater vulnerability assessment to pollution in Kasihan, Bantul Regency: A comparative method study (GOD, SINTACS and DRASTIC)
    Purnama, Ignasius Loyola Setyawan
    Primacintya, Vincentia Anindha
    [J]. 1ST GEOSCIENCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES SYMPOSIUM (ICST 2020), 2020, 200
  • [4] GIS Based Assessment of Groundwater Vulnerability Using Drastic Model
    Kumar, Sathees
    Thirumalaivasan, D.
    Radhakrishnan, Nisha
    [J]. ARABIAN JOURNAL FOR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2014, 39 (01) : 207 - 216
  • [5] GIS Based Assessment of Groundwater Vulnerability Using Drastic Model
    Sathees Kumar
    D. Thirumalaivasan
    Nisha Radhakrishnan
    [J]. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 2014, 39 : 207 - 216
  • [6] Local Scale Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment with an Improved DRASTIC Model
    Santanu Mallik
    Tridip Bhowmik
    Umesh Mishra
    Niladri Paul
    [J]. Natural Resources Research, 2021, 30 : 2145 - 2160
  • [7] Evaluation of groundwater vulnerability in the Rachna Doab using a modified DRASTIC model: a comparative analysis
    Z. U. Rehman
    N. M. Khan
    F. Ul Haq
    I. Ahmad
    A. Raheem
    [J]. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2024, 21 : 6459 - 6480
  • [8] Local Scale Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment with an Improved DRASTIC Model
    Mallik, Santanu
    Bhowmik, Tridip
    Mishra, Umesh
    Paul, Niladri
    [J]. NATURAL RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2021, 30 (03) : 2145 - 2160
  • [9] Evaluation of groundwater vulnerability in the Rachna Doab using a modified DRASTIC model: a comparative analysis
    Rehman, Z. U.
    Khan, N. M.
    Ul Haq, F.
    Ahmad, I.
    Raheem, A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 21 (09) : 6459 - 6480
  • [10] A comparative analysis on groundwater vulnerability models—fuzzy DRASTIC and fuzzy DRASTIC-L
    Thiyagarajan Saranya
    Subbarayan Saravanan
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29 : 86005 - 86019