Dual imaging agent for magnetic particle imaging and computed tomography

被引:4
|
作者
Liu, Sitong [1 ]
Heshmat, Anahita [2 ]
Andrew, Jennifer [3 ]
Barreto, Izabella [2 ]
Rinaldi-Ramos, Carlos M. M. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Chem Engn, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Dept Radiol, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
[3] Univ Florida, Dept Mat Sci & Engn, Gainesville, FL 32603 USA
[4] Univ Florida, J Crayton Pruitt Family Dept Biomed Engn, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
来源
NANOSCALE ADVANCES | 2023年 / 5卷 / 11期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
IRON-OXIDE NANOPARTICLES; PLATFORM;
D O I
10.1039/d3na00105a
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Magnetic particle imaging (MPI) is a novel biomedical imaging modality that allows non-invasive, tomographic, and quantitative tracking of the distribution of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle (SPION) tracers. While MPI possesses high sensitivity, detecting nanograms of iron, it does not provide anatomical information. Computed tomography (CT) is a widely used biomedical imaging modality that yields anatomical information at high resolution. A multimodal imaging agent combining the benefits of MPI and CT imaging would be of interest. Here we combine MPI-tailored SPIONs with CT-contrast hafnium oxide (hafnia) nanoparticles using flash nanoprecipitation to obtain dual-imaging MPI/CT agents. Co-encapsulation of iron oxide and hafnia in the composite nanoparticles was confirmed via transmission electron microscopy and elemental mapping. Equilibrium and dynamic magnetic characterization show a reduction in effective magnetic diameter and changes in dynamic magnetic susceptibility spectra at high oscillating field frequencies, suggesting magnetic interactions within the composite dual imaging tracers. The MPI performance of the dual imaging agent was evaluated and compared to the commercial tracer ferucarbotran. The dual-imaging agent has MPI sensitivity that is similar to 3x better than this commercial tracer. However, worsening of MPI resolution was observed in the composite tracer when compared to individually coated SPIONs. This worsening resolution could result from magnetic dipolar interactions within the composite dual imaging tracer. The CT performance of the dual imaging agent was evaluated in a pre-clinical animal scanner and a clinical scanner, revealing better contrast compared to a commercial iodine-based contrast agent. We demonstrate that the dual imaging agent can be differentiated from the commercial iodine contrast agent using dual energy CT (DECT) imaging. Furthermore, the dual imaging agent displayed energy-dependent CT contrast arising from the combination of SPION and hafnia, making it potentially suitable for virtual monochromatic imaging of the contrast agent distribution using DECT.
引用
收藏
页码:3018 / 3032
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dual Contrast Agent for Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Hard Tissue Imaging
    Ventura, Manuela
    Sun, Yi
    Rusu, Viorel
    Laverman, Peter
    Borm, Paul
    Heerschap, Arend
    Oosterwijk, Egbert
    Boerman, Otto C.
    Jansen, John A.
    Walboomers, X. Frank
    TISSUE ENGINEERING PART C-METHODS, 2013, 19 (06) : 405 - 416
  • [2] Functionalizable composite nanoparticles as a dual magnetic resonance imaging/computed tomography contrast agent for medical imaging
    Illert, Patrick
    Waengler, Bjoern
    Waengler, Carmen
    Zoellner, Frank
    Uhrig, Tanja
    Litau, Shanna
    Pretze, Marc
    Roeder, Thorsten
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE, 2019, 136 (19)
  • [3] Magnetic Particle Imaging meets Computed Tomography: first simultaneous imaging
    Patrick Vogel
    Jonathan Markert
    Martin A. Rückert
    Stefan Herz
    Benedikt Keßler
    Kilian Dremel
    Daniel Althoff
    Matthias Weber
    Thorsten M. Buzug
    Thorsten A. Bley
    Walter H. Kullmann
    Randolf Hanke
    Simon Zabler
    Volker C. Behr
    Scientific Reports, 9
  • [4] Magnetic Particle Imaging meets Computed Tomography: first simultaneous imaging
    Vogel, Patrick
    Markert, Jonathan
    Rueckert, Martin A.
    Herz, Stefan
    Kessler, Benedikt
    Dremel, Kilian
    Althoff, Daniel
    Webers, Matthias
    Buzug, Thorsten M.
    Bley, Thorsten A.
    Kullmann, Walter H.
    Hanke, Randolf
    Zabler, Simon
    Behr, Volker C.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [5] Adrenal Imaging: Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography
    McCarthy, Colin J.
    McDermott, Shaunagh
    Blake, Michael A.
    IMAGING IN ENDOCRINE DISORDERS, 2016, 45 : 55 - 69
  • [6] Musculoskeletal Imaging with Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging: When is Computed Tomography the Study of Choice?
    Fayad, Laura M.
    Bluemke, David A.
    Fishman, Elliot K.
    CURRENT PROBLEMS IN DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY, 2005, 34 (06) : 220 - 237
  • [7] Multimodal contrast agent for combined computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging applications
    Zheng, JZ
    Perkins, G
    Kirilova, A
    Allen, C
    Jaffray, DA
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2006, 41 (03) : 339 - 348
  • [8] Dual source computed tomography in coronary imaging
    Kepka, Cezary
    Pregowski, Jerzy
    Kruk, Mariusz
    POSTEPY W KARDIOLOGII INTERWENCYJNEJ, 2008, 4 (01): : 31 - 34
  • [9] Diagnostic Imaging Performance of Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Compared with Conventional Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Uterine Cervical Cancer
    Shibuki, Saki
    Saida, Tsukasa
    Mori, Kensaku
    Ishiguro, Toshitaka
    Amano, Taishi
    Yoshida, Miki
    Miyata, Mariko
    Satoh, Toyomi
    Nakajima, Takahito
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND IMAGING, 2024, 34 (04): : 661 - 669
  • [10] Imaging in multiple myeloma: Computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging?
    Tagliafico, Alberto Stefano
    WORLD JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 13 (07): : 223 - 226