Live birth rate following endometrial preparation with daily versus depot GnRH agonist

被引:0
|
作者
Fidan, Ulas [1 ]
Ozturk, Mustafa [1 ]
Ceyhan, Temel [1 ]
Kazimova, Lala [2 ]
Karasahin, Emre [2 ]
机构
[1] Hlth Sci Univ Gulhane Med Fac, IVF Ctr, Ankara, Turkiye
[2] Hlth Sci Univ Gulhane Med Fac, Obstet & Gynecol, Ankara, Turkiye
关键词
Euploid embryo; artificial endometrium; GnRH agonist; PERINATAL OUTCOMES; EMBRYO-TRANSFER; STIMULATION; FRESH;
D O I
10.1080/01443615.2023.2274102
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) downregulates gonadotropin secretion in the pituitary gland. It is used both in ovulation induction protocols and in artificial endometrium preparation. Frozen-thawed embryo transfer to artificially prepared endometrium (FET-APE) is a frequent procedure in vitro fertilization (IVF) which requires GnRHa. It can be used either as a daily low-dose injection or as a single depot injection. It is unclear which of these two regimens is superior for artificial endometrium preparation.Methods We evaluated the data of 72 patients who had undergone frozen embryo transfer following the 5th day Preimplantation Genetic Test-aneuploidy (PGT-A) between 2018-2021. All embryos were genetically screened, and euploid single embryos were transferred. Group 1 (n: 36) used depot GnRHa, and Group 2 (n: 36) used single daily injections for artificial endometrial preparation. The outcomes for Beta Human Chorionic Gonadotrophin (BHCG) positivity and live birth rates (LBR) was compared.Results The BHCG positivity for Group 1 and Group 2 was 75% and 80.6%, respectively. The LBR for Group 1 and Group 2 were found to be 58.3% and 63.9%, respectively. There was no statistically significant differences between the two groups.Conclusions In artificial endometrium preparation, depot GnRHa offers cheaper and more convenient alternative to single daily dose injections, particularly in busy clinical settings. Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) is used to Frozen-thawed embryo transfer to artificially prepared endometrium (FET-APE). However, it is not known which of the depot and daily preparations is more effective. Our study to exclusively compare 5th day euploid single embryos transferred in FET-APE cycles using depot or daily injections of GnRHa to avoid any influences of oocyte or spermatozoa dependent factors on Beta Human Chorionic Gonadotrophin (BHCG) positivity and live birth rates (LBR). The results were similar. Since the results are similar, the depot GnRHa form can be preferred for ease of use. However, future studies on larger series and patients with different clinical characteristics may effects the results.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Early GnRH-agonist therapy does not negatively impact the endometrial repair process or live birth rate
    Wang, Chen
    Peng, Yangqin
    Chen, Hui
    Wang, Qinmei
    Dong, Yu
    Liu, Huimin
    Yao, Yaoshan
    Zhang, Shunji
    Li, Yuan
    Cai, Sufen
    Li, Xihong
    Lin, Ge
    Gong, Fei
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [2] No improvement in live birth rate after luteal phase support by GnRH agonist
    Le Levreur, B.
    Frantz, S.
    Lambert, M.
    Chansel-Debordeaux, L.
    Bernard, V.
    Carriere, J.
    Verdy, G.
    Hocke, C.
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE, 2023, 51 (05): : 249 - 255
  • [3] The depot GnRH agonist protocol improves the live birth rate per fresh embryo transfer cycle, but not the cumulative live birth rate in normal responders: a randomized controlled trial and molecular mechanism study
    Xu, Bei
    Geerts, Dirk
    Hu, Shiqiao
    Yue, Jing
    Li, Zhou
    Zhu, Guijin
    Jin, Lei
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2020, 35 (06) : 1306 - 1318
  • [4] The follicular-phase depot GnRH agonist protocol results in a higher live birth rate without discernible differences in luteal function and child health versus the daily mid-luteal GnRH agonist protocol: a single-centre, retrospective, propensity score matched cohort study
    Zhang, Ying
    Zhao, Wenxian
    Han, Yifan
    Chen, Xin
    Xu, Shaoyuan
    Hu, Yueyue
    Diao, Honglu
    Zhang, Changjun
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY AND ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2022, 20 (01)
  • [5] The follicular-phase depot GnRH agonist protocol results in a higher live birth rate without discernible differences in luteal function and child health versus the daily mid-luteal GnRH agonist protocol: a single-centre, retrospective, propensity score matched cohort study
    Ying Zhang
    Wenxian Zhao
    Yifan Han
    Xin Chen
    Shaoyuan Xu
    Yueyue Hu
    Honglu Diao
    Changjun Zhang
    Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 20
  • [6] THE EFFECT OF GnRH AGONIST VERSUS GnRH ANTAGONIST ON PREGNANCY RATE
    Bastu, Ercan
    Baysal, Bulent
    ACTA ENDOCRINOLOGICA-BUCHAREST, 2012, 8 (02) : 249 - 256
  • [7] GnRH agonist versus GnRH antagonist in ovarian stimulation: the role of endometrial receptivity
    Orvieto, Raoul
    Meltzer, Simion
    Rabinson, Jacob
    Zohav, Efraim
    Anteby, Eyal Y.
    Nahum, Ravit
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2008, 90 (04) : 1294 - 1296
  • [8] Live birth rates following individualized dosing algorithm of follitropin delta in a long GnRH agonist protocol
    Sanchez, Manuel Fernandez
    Larsson, Per
    Serrano, Marcos Ferrando
    Bosch, Ernesto
    Velasco, Juan Antonio Garcia
    Lopez, Esther Santamaria
    Mannaerts, Bernadette
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY AND ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2023, 21 (01)
  • [9] Live birth rates following individualized dosing algorithm of follitropin delta in a long GnRH agonist protocol
    Manuel Fernández Sánchez
    Per Larsson
    Marcos Ferrando Serrano
    Ernesto Bosch
    Juan Antonio García Velasco
    Esther Santamaría López
    Bernadette Mannaerts
    Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 21
  • [10] Efficacy of daily GnRH agonist for luteal phase support following GnRH agonist triggered ICSI cycles versus conventional strategy: A Randomized controlled trial
    Salehpour, Saghar
    Nazari, Leila
    Hosseini, Sedighe
    Azizi, Elham
    Borumandnia, Nasrin
    Hashemi, Teibeh
    JORNAL BRASILEIRO DE REPRODUCAO ASSISTIDA, 2021, 25 (03): : 368 - 372