Implementing ePROM in specialist palliative home care: the professionals' perspective - a mixed-methods study

被引:0
|
作者
Burner-Fritsch, Isabel [1 ]
Kolmhuber, Stefanie [2 ]
Hodiamont, Farina [2 ]
Bausewein, Claudia [2 ]
Hriskova, Katerina [2 ]
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Univ Hosp, Dept Palliat Med, Bahnhofstr 20, D-83673 Bichl, Germany
[2] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Univ Hosp, Dept Palliat Med, Munich, Germany
来源
关键词
electronic patient-reported outcome measures; palliative care; palliative home care; patient-reported outcome measurement; professionals' perspective; REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES; HEALTH-CARE; CLINICAL-PRACTICE; QUALITY; FACILITATORS; SERVICES;
D O I
10.1177/26323524231186827
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background:Over the last decades, patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) have been developed for a better understanding of patient needs. The Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale (IPOS) is an internationally recommended PROM in palliative care. The validated electronic version of IPOS (eIPOS) was implemented in four German specialist palliative home care (SPHC) teams for use in everyday clinical practice. Patients reported symptoms and concerns via eIPOS, which were transmitted directly to the electronic patient record of the respective SPHC team.Objectives:The aim of the study was to describe and explore the health care professionals' (HCPs') experiences regarding acceptance and use of eIPOS in clinical practice in SPHC.Design:The mixed-methods sequential explanatory design comprised an anonymized quantitative online survey followed by qualitative focus groups.Methods:The online survey asked in both closed and open questions for HCP's experience with eIPOS. Ambiguous results from the survey were discussed in two focus groups. Survey data were analysed with descriptive and univariable statistics, and the framework approach was used for qualitative data. In a further step, we conducted integrated analysis of quantitative and qualitative results using joint displays.Results:All HCPs of the four SPHC teams (n = 52) were invited to participate. HCPs participating in the survey (n = 32) and the focus groups (n = 7) saw potentials for implementing ePROM in palliative home care - as far as it is technically easy to handle and can be easily integrated into clinical practice.Conclusion:Successful use of ePROMs is affected by the possibility of easy integration into the teams' different structures and processes and the HCPs' perceptions of potentials regarding ePROM use in SPHC.RegistrationThe study is registered on clinicaltrials.org (NCT03879668). The use of electronic patient-reported outcome measures in specialist palliative home care: what do professionals think about it? A mixed-methods studyPatient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are short questionnaires developed to assess a patient's health status at a particular point in time. The Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale (IPOS) is such a questionnaire, and eIPOS is an electronic version of IPOS. IPOS asks about patients' symptoms and problems when they suffer from advanced diseases. We conducted this study to understand what health care professionals (HCPs) think about electronic PROMs (ePROMs) in palliative home care. We first asked the HCPs to answer questions in an online survey. Then, HCPs discussed the use of eIPOS in small discussion groups. This study design is called 'Mixed-Methods sequential design'. We found that all HCPs used the information they received through eIPOS - some frequently and some less often. Many HCPs see potential in using ePROMs to support care. For example, because ePROMs help them to understand patients' symptoms and problems better. However, they also pointed out that eIPOS needs technical improvement. Also, the procedures of eIPOS need to fit into the work routine of the palliative care team. The findings demonstrate the perspectives of HCPs on ePROM. These are valuable to understand how ePROM can be implemented in palliative home care. We can also learn about how to implement other digital tools in other settings of palliative care.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Palliative care in mental health facilities from the perspective of nurses: a mixed-methods study
    Evenblij, K.
    Widdershoven, G. A. M.
    Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B. D.
    de Kam, H.
    Pasman, H. R. W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC AND MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2016, 23 (6-7) : 409 - 418
  • [2] Perspective of Dutch healthcare professionals on care for female urinary incontinence: A mixed-methods study
    van Boxtel, Jorke
    Wessels, Nienke J.
    Ruiter, Eline J.
    Loohuis, Anne M. M.
    Metting, Esther I.
    van der Worp, Henk
    Blanker, Marco H.
    [J]. CONTINENCE, 2023, 6
  • [3] Perspective of Dutch healthcare professionals on care for female urinary incontinence: a mixed-methods study
    van Boxtel, Jorke
    Wessels, Nienke
    Ruiter, Eline
    Loohuis, Anne
    Metting, Esther
    van der Worp, Henk
    Blanker, Marco
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2023, 73
  • [4] Specialist paediatric palliative care for children and young people with cancer: A mixed-methods systematic review
    Taylor, Johanna
    Booth, Alison
    Beresford, Bryony
    Phillips, Bob
    Wright, Kath
    Fraser, Lorna
    [J]. PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2020, 34 (06) : 731 - 775
  • [5] Impact of COVID-19 on Mental Health of Palliative Care Professionals and Services: A Mixed-Methods Survey Study
    Chan, Wallace Chi Ho
    Woo, Raymond Kam Wing
    Kwok, Denis Ka-Shaw
    Yu, Clare Tsz Kiu
    Chiu, Lawrence Man-Hon
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 39 (10): : 1227 - 1235
  • [6] Computer screening for palliative care needs in primary care: a mixed-methods study
    Mason, Bruce
    Boyd, Kirsty
    Steyn, John
    Kendall, Marilyn
    Macpherson, Stella
    Murray, Scott A.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2018, 68 (670): : E360 - E369
  • [7] Personal positioning of oncology patients in palliative care: a mixed-methods study
    Hellen Luiza Meireles Silva
    Pedro Henrique Martins Valério
    Cristiano Roque Antunes Barreira
    Fernanda Maris Peria
    [J]. BMC Palliative Care, 21
  • [8] Personal positioning of oncology patients in palliative care: a mixed-methods study
    Silva, Hellen Luiza Meireles
    Valerio, Pedro Henrique Martins
    Barreira, Cristiano Roque Antunes
    Peria, Fernanda Maris
    [J]. BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2022, 21 (01)
  • [9] Latent Classes of Prognosis Conversations in Palliative Care: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Gramling, Robert
    Norton, Sally
    Ladwig, Susan
    Winters, Paul
    Metzger, Maureen
    Quill, Timothy
    Alexander, Stewart
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2013, 16 (06) : 653 - 660
  • [10] Interrater agreement of multi-professional case review as reference standard for specialist palliative care need: a mixed-methods study
    Mueller, Evelyn
    Mueller, Michael Josef
    Seibel, Katharina
    Boehlke, Christopher
    Schaefer, Henning
    Klein, Carsten
    Heckel, Maria
    Simon, Steffen T.
    Becker, Gerhild
    [J]. BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2023, 22 (01)