Using life cycle assessment to quantify the environmental benefits of circular economy strategies in the nuclear industry

被引:1
|
作者
Pucciarelli, Martina [1 ]
Palethorpe, Stephen J. [2 ]
Spencer, Julian [3 ]
Banford, Anthony [3 ]
Lettieri, Paola [1 ]
Paulillo, Andrea [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Chem Engn, Torrington Pl, London WC1 E7JE, England
[2] Natl Nucl Lab, Workington CA14 3YQ, Cumbria, England
[3] Natl Nucl Lab, Chadwick House,Warrington Rd,Birchwood Pk, Warrington WA3 6AE, England
关键词
Nuclear waste; Reprocessing; Deep geological repository; Radiological impacts; Consequential LCA; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; ENERGY; POWER; FOOTPRINT; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.pnucene.2023.105026
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
In the United Kingdom nuclear energy is expected to play a key role in decarbonising the power generation sector. The implementation of circular economy approaches in the nuclear industry can minimize the amount and the associated environmental impacts of nuclear wastes. In this article, we demonstrate how Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) can be used to investigate the environmental benefits of two circular economy strategies that aim at reducing the amount of intermediate level waste (ILW) destined for disposal in a geological disposal facility. The first case study focuses on a novel technology for recycling zirconium alloy cladding waste, whilst the second case study investigates the environmental benefits of using depleted (instead of natural) uranium to produce uranyl nitrate, a chemical used in the PUREX process. Our results show that both circular approaches outperform conventional ones across all environmental categories and particularly in terms of resources depletion, with reductions up to 25% and 94% for respectively zirconium alloy recycling and depleted uranium reuse. The environmental benefits of both approaches are due not only to a reduction in the amount of ILW to be disposed of, but also because they are assumed to induce a reduction in the demand for mining of primary zirconium or uranium respectively. When both approaches are combined, the environmental benefits range from 4% in the category freshwater and up to 94% in the category resource use, energy carriers.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Circular economy paths in the olive oil industry: a Life Cycle Assessment look into environmental performance and benefits
    Ncube, Amos
    Fiorentino, Gabriella
    Panfilo, Carolina
    De Falco, Maria
    Ulgiati, Sergio
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2024, 29 (08): : 1541 - 1561
  • [2] Life cycle stage practices and strategies for circular economy: assessment in construction and demolition industry of an emerging economy
    Richard Asante
    Daniel Faibil
    Martin Agyemang
    Sharffudin Ahmed Khan
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29 : 82110 - 82121
  • [3] Life cycle stage practices and strategies for circular economy: assessment in construction and demolition industry of an emerging economy
    Asante, Richard
    Faibil, Daniel
    Agyemang, Martin
    Khan, Sharffudin Ahmed
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (54) : 82110 - 82121
  • [4] A Life Cycle Assessment to Evaluate the Environmental Benefits of Applying the Circular Economy Model to the Fertiliser Sector
    El Chami, Daniel
    Santagata, Raffaella
    Moretti, Stefania
    Moreschi, Luca
    Del Borghi, Adriana
    Gallo, Michela
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (21)
  • [5] Using life cycle assessment to achieve a circular economy
    Pena, Claudia
    Civit, Barbara
    Gallego-Schmid, Alejandro
    Druckman, Angela
    Caldeira-Pires, Armando
    Weidema, Bo
    Mieras, Eric
    Wang, Feng
    Fava, Jim
    Canals, Llorenc Mila i
    Cordella, Mauro
    Arbuckle, Peter
    Valdivia, Sonia
    Fallaha, Sophie
    Motta, Wladmir
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2021, 26 (02): : 215 - 220
  • [6] Using life cycle assessment to achieve a circular economy
    Claudia Peña
    Bárbara Civit
    Alejandro Gallego-Schmid
    Angela Druckman
    Armando Caldeira- Pires
    Bo Weidema
    Eric Mieras
    Feng Wang
    Jim Fava
    Llorenç Milà i Canals
    Mauro Cordella
    Peter Arbuckle
    Sonia Valdivia
    Sophie Fallaha
    Wladmir Motta
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2021, 26 : 215 - 220
  • [7] An analysis of design strategies for circular economy through life cycle assessment
    Christian Spreafico
    [J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2022, 194
  • [8] An analysis of design strategies for circular economy through life cycle assessment
    Spreafico, Christian
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2022, 194 (03)
  • [9] Strategies for efficient management of microplastics to achieve life cycle assessment and circular economy
    Tamer Elsamahy
    Rania Al-Tohamy
    Esraa A. Abdelkarim
    Daochen Zhu
    Mostafa El-Sheekh
    Jianzhong Sun
    Sameh S. Ali
    [J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2023, 195
  • [10] Strategies for efficient management of microplastics to achieve life cycle assessment and circular economy
    Elsamahy, Tamer
    Al-Tohamy, Rania
    Abdelkarim, Esraa A.
    Zhu, Daochen
    El-Sheekh, Mostafa
    Sun, Jianzhong
    Ali, Sameh S.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2023, 195 (11)