Empirical correlation for in-situ deformation modulus of sedimentary rock slope mass and support system recommendation using the Qslope method

被引:6
|
作者
Mao, Yimin [1 ]
Azarafza, Mohammad [2 ]
Bonab, Masoud Hajialilue [2 ]
Bascompta, Marc [3 ]
Nanehkaran, Yaser A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Shaoguan Univ, Sch Informat Engn, Shaoguan, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Tabriz, Dept Civil Engn, Tabriz, Iran
[3] Univ Politecn Cataluna, Dept Min Engn, Barcelona, Spain
[4] Yancheng Teachers Univ, Sch Informat Engn, Yancheng, Peoples R China
关键词
deformation modulus; geomechanical classification systems; Qslope; rock mass rating; rock quality designation; rock slope mass; sedimentary rock; RATING SMR; YOUNGS MODULUS; POISSONS RATIO; CLASSIFICATION; STABILITY; DEFORMABILITY; SOUTH;
D O I
10.12989/gae.2023.35.5.539
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This article is dedicated to the pursuit of establishing a robust empirical relationship that allows for the estimation of in-situ modulus of deformations (E-m and G(m)) within sedimentary rock slope masses through the utilization of Q(slope) values. To achieve this significant objective, an expansive and thorough methodology is employed, encompassing a comprehensive field survey, meticulous sample collection, and rigorous laboratory testing. The study sources a total of 26 specimens from five distinct locations within the South Pars (known as Assalouyeh) region, ensuring a representative dataset for robust correlations. The results of this extensive analysis reveal compelling empirical connections between Em, geomechanical characteristics of the rock mass, and the calculated Q(slope) values. Specifically, these relationships are expressed as follows: E-m = 2.859 Q(slope) + 4.628 (R-2 = 0.554), and G(m) = 1.856 Q(slope) + 3.008 (R-2 = 0.524). Moreover, the study unravels intriguing insights into the interplay between in-situ deformation moduli and the widely utilized Rock Mass Rating (RMR) computations, leading to the formulation of equations that facilitate predictions: RMR = 18.12 E(m)0.460 (R-2 = 0.798) and RMR = 22.09 G(m)0.460 (R-2 = 0.766). Beyond these correlations, the study delves into the intricate relationship between RMR and Rock Quality Designation (RQD) with Qslope values. The findings elucidate the following relationships: RMR = 34.05e(0.33Qslope) (R-2 = 0.712) and RQD = 31.42(e0.549Qslope) (R-2 = 0.902). Furthermore, leveraging the insights garnered from this comprehensive analysis, the study offers an empirically derived support system tailored to the distinct characteristics of discontinuous rock slopes, grounded firmly within the framework of the Q(slope) methodology. This holistic approach contributes significantly to advancing the understanding of sedimentary rock slope stability and provides valuable tools for informed engineering decisions.
引用
收藏
页码:539 / 554
页数:16
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] An empirical method for slope mass rating-Qslope correlation for Isfahan province, Iran
    Azarafza, Mohammad
    Nikoobakht, Shahrzad
    Rahnamarad, Jafar
    Asasi, Fariba
    Derakhshani, Reza
    METHODSX, 2020, 7
  • [2] A comparison of evaluation of rock mass deformation modulus from in-situ method and indirect one (empirical method) in Parsian dam site
    Zadeh, N. S.
    BOUNDARIES OF ROCK MECHANICS: RECENT ADVANCES AND CHALLENGES FOR THE 21ST CENTURY, 2008, : 35 - 37
  • [3] Study of size effect of rock mass deformation modulus based on in-situ test
    Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China
    不详
    Rock Soil Mech, 9 (2875-2881):
  • [4] Study of size effect of rock mass deformation modulus based on in-situ test
    Zhang Zhan-rong
    Sheng Qian
    Yang Yan-shuang
    Zhu Ze-qi
    Zhang Yu-min
    Wang Zhao-wei
    ROCK AND SOIL MECHANICS, 2010, 31 (09) : 2875 - 2881
  • [5] Estimation of limestone rock mass deformation modulus using empirical equations
    Rassoul Ajalloeian
    Mojtaba Mohammadi
    Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2014, 73 : 541 - 550
  • [6] Estimation of limestone rock mass deformation modulus using empirical equations
    Ajalloeian, Rassoul
    Mohammadi, Mojtaba
    BULLETIN OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 73 (02) : 541 - 550
  • [7] Estimation of the rock mass deformation modulus using a rock classification system
    Khabbazi, A.
    Ghafoori, M.
    Lashkaripour, G. R.
    Cheshomi, A.
    GEOMECHANICS AND GEOENGINEERING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2013, 8 (01): : 46 - 52
  • [8] Using P-wave propagation velocity to characterize damage and estimate deformation modulus of in-situ rock mass
    Dai Guoliang
    Liu Jun
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2022, 26 (06) : 2143 - 2157
  • [9] Calculation of the stress state of a rock mass using in-situ data on deformation
    Kurlenya, MV
    Mirenkov, VY
    Shutov, AV
    JOURNAL OF MINING SCIENCE, 1999, 35 (03) : 231 - 239
  • [10] A comparative study of the determination of rock mass deformation modulus by using different empirical approaches
    Aksoy, C. Okay
    Genis, Melih
    Aldas, Gulsev Uyar
    Ozacar, Vehbi
    Ozer, Samet C.
    Yilmaz, Ozgur
    ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2012, 131 : 19 - 28