A Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Framework for Evaluating Strategic Alternatives in Complex Business Markets

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, Yun [1 ]
Jiang, Leilei [2 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Chem Ind Vocat Coll, Chongqing 401220, Peoples R China
[2] Anhui Open Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Hefei 230022, Peoples R China
来源
FLUCTUATION AND NOISE LETTERS | 2024年 / 23卷 / 03期
关键词
Multi-criteria decision analysis; complex business markets; optimal and optimum alternatives; alternatives in complex business markets; SELECTION; OPTIONS; SECTOR;
D O I
10.1142/S0219477524500226
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Considering all of the criteria involved in vendor evaluation makes it a difficult Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) problem. In this case, they factor in DMs that are knowledgeable about the suppliers and their needs. Rating, a multi-criteria assessment method based on optimum scoring is proposed in this work. To meet the requirements of the decision-making process, this method employs rating-Based Optimal-Point Sorting (RBOP). A tried-and-true MCDM method can consistently find the option that will make the DM happy by first modeling the decision-making process after how humans really behave. Additionally, they create a new subjective scoring mechanism for the MCDM that is based on human behavior; they call it the win-loss-draw (WLD) method. They apply their methods to a case study that is based on actual Iranian cheese company operations in order to find the best possible cheese supplier for a hypermarket in Iran. The WLD approach had an effect on the RBOP strategy's findings, which differ somewhat from the other MCDM methods. The WLD method increased spread and optimum regions throughout the choosing process.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A multi-criteria decision analysis framework for evaluating point-of-use water treatment alternatives
    Joost Santos
    Sheree Ann Pagsuyoin
    Jana Latayan
    [J]. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2016, 18 : 1263 - 1279
  • [2] A multi-criteria decision analysis framework for evaluating point-of-use water treatment alternatives
    Santos, Joost
    Pagsuyoin, Sheree Ann
    Latayan, Jana
    [J]. CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2016, 18 (05) : 1263 - 1279
  • [3] Decerns: A Framework for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Boris Yatsalo
    Vladimir Didenko
    Sergey Gritsyuk
    Terry Sullivan
    [J]. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 2015, 8 : 467 - 489
  • [4] Decerns: A Framework for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Yatsalo, Boris
    Didenko, Vladimir
    Gritsyuk, Sergey
    Sullivan, Terry
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS, 2015, 8 (03) : 467 - 489
  • [5] Raising the bar: strategic multi-criteria decision analysis
    Montibeller, G.
    Franco, L. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2011, 62 (05) : 855 - 867
  • [6] A fuzzy multi-criteria group decision making framework for evaluating health-care waste disposal alternatives
    Dursun, Mehtap
    Karsak, E. Ertugrul
    Karadayi, Melis Almula
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (09) : 11453 - 11462
  • [7] Multi-Criteria Assessment of Vegetable Production Business Alternatives
    Pozderec, Silvo
    Bavec, Martina
    Rozman, Crtomir
    Vincec, Jozef
    Pazek, Karmen
    [J]. ORGANIZACIJA, 2015, 48 (03) : 203 - 213
  • [8] Multi-criteria decision analysis: A framework for managing contaminated sediments
    Linkov, I
    Sahay, S
    Kiker, G
    Bridges, T
    Seager, TP
    [J]. STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT OF MARINE ECOSYSTEMS, 2005, 50 : 271 - 297
  • [9] A hybrid framework for evaluating corporate sustainability using multi-criteria decision making
    Aktas, N.
    Demirel, N.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 23 (10) : 15591 - 15618
  • [10] A Framework for Locating Logistic Facilities with Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Montibeller, Gilberto
    Yoshizaki, Hugo
    [J]. EVOLUTIONARY MULTI-CRITERION OPTIMIZATION, 2011, 6576 : 505 - +