How good are AlphaFold models for docking-based virtual screening?

被引:68
|
作者
Scardino, Valeria [1 ,2 ]
Di Filippo, Juan I. [2 ,3 ]
Cavasotto, Claudio N. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Meton AI Inc, Wilmington, DE 19801 USA
[2] Univ Austral, Austral Inst Appl Artificial Intelligence, Pilar, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[3] Univ Austral, Computat Drug Design & Biomed Informat Lab, Inst Invest Med Traslac IIMT, CONICET, Pilar, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[4] Univ Austral, Fac Ciencias Biomed, Fac Ingn, Pilar, Buenos Aires, Argentina
关键词
PROTEIN-LIGAND DOCKING; STRUCTURE PREDICTION; FLEXIBILITY; DISCOVERY; ACCURACY; SETS;
D O I
10.1016/j.isci.2022.105920
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
A crucial component in structure-based drug discovery is the availability of high -quality three-dimensional structures of the protein target. Whenever experi-mental structures were not available, homology modeling has been, so far, the method of choice. Recently, AlphaFold (AF), an artificial-intelligence-based pro-tein structure prediction method, has shown impressive results in terms of model accuracy. This outstanding success prompted us to evaluate how accurate AF models are from the perspective of docking-based drug discovery. We compared the high-throughput docking (HTD) performance of AF models with their corre-sponding experimental PDB structures using a benchmark set of 22 targets. The AF models showed consistently worse performance using four docking pro-grams and two consensus techniques. Although AlphaFold shows a remarkable ability to predict protein architecture, this might not be enough to guarantee that AF models can be reliably used for HTD, and post-modeling refinement stra-tegies might be key to increase the chances of success.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Docking-based virtual screening: Probing its applicability to GPCR models
    Cohen, Austin
    Danfora, Abigail
    Biederman, Michelle
    Costanzi, Stefano
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2017, 254
  • [2] Docking-Based Virtual Screening: Recent Developments
    Tuccinardi, Tiziano
    COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY & HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING, 2009, 12 (03) : 303 - 314
  • [3] Preparation of Target CETP in Docking-based Virtual Screening
    Tao, Weiye
    Wang, Laiyou
    Huang, Guoquan
    Luo, Man
    APPLIED MECHANICS AND MATERIALS II, PTS 1 AND 2, 2014, 477-478 : 1495 - +
  • [4] Boosting Docking-Based Virtual Screening with Deep Learning
    Pereira, Janaina Cruz
    Caffarena, Ernesto Raul
    dos Santos, Cicero Nogueira
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2016, 56 (12) : 2495 - 2506
  • [5] Docking-based inverse virtual screening: methods,applications, and challenges
    Xianjin Xu
    Marshal Huang
    Xiaoqin Zou
    BiophysicsReports, 2018, 4 (01) : 1 - 16
  • [6] Design of a docking-based virtual high throughput screening system
    Qadry, SS
    McDonald, N
    METMBS'03: PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICS AND ENGINEERING TECHNIQUES IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2003, : 282 - 287
  • [7] Docking-based virtual screening of Chk1 inhibitors
    Li, Yan
    Kim, Dong Joon
    Bode, Ann M.
    Dong, Zigang
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2011, 71
  • [8] Improving docking-based virtual screening with convolutional neural networks
    Pereira, Janaina Cruz
    Santos, Cicero
    Caffarena, Ernesto
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2018, 256
  • [9] Improving performance of docking-based virtual screening by structural filtration
    Fedor N. Novikov
    Viktor S. Stroylov
    Oleg V. Stroganov
    Ghermes G. Chilov
    Journal of Molecular Modeling, 2010, 16 : 1223 - 1230
  • [10] Improving performance of docking-based virtual screening by structural filtration
    Novikov, Fedor N.
    Stroylov, Viktor S.
    Stroganov, Oleg V.
    Chilov, Ghermes G.
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR MODELING, 2010, 16 (07) : 1223 - 1230