Optimizing longitudinal control model parameters of connected and automated vehicles using empirical trajectory data of human drivers in risky car-following scenarios

被引:2
|
作者
Xing, Lu [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Dan [3 ]
Tang, You-yi [1 ]
Li, Ye [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Changsha Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Traff & Transportat Engn, Changsha 410114, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Beijing Natl Res Ctr Informat Sci & Technol, Dept Automat, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[3] Cent South Univ, Sch Traff & Transportat Engn, Changsha 410075, Peoples R China
[4] Changsha Univ Sci & Technol, Hunan Key Lab Smart Roadway & Cooperat Vehicle Inf, Changsha 410114, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
traffic safety; connected and automated vehicle; adaptive cruise control; cooperative adaptive cruise control; longitudinal control model parameters; ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL;
D O I
10.1007/s11771-023-5413-6
中图分类号
TF [冶金工业];
学科分类号
0806 ;
摘要
Connected and automated vehicles (CAVs) have great potential to improve driving safety. A basic performance evaluation criterion of CAVs is whether they can drive more safely than human drivers in real traffic scenarios. This study proposes a method to optimize longitudinal control model parameters of CAVs using empirical trajectory data of human drivers in risky car-following scenarios. Firstly, the initial car-following pairs (I-CFP) are extracted from empirical trajectory data. Then, two types of real longitudinal control models of CAVs, the adaptive cruise control (ACC) and the cooperative ACC (CACC) control models, are employed for simulation in the car-following scenarios with default parameter values, which generate original trajectories of simulated car-following pairs (S-CFP). Finally, a genetic algorithm (GA) is applied to optimize control model parameters of ACC and CACC vehicles and generate optimized trajectories of car-following pairs (O-CFP). Results indicate that safety condition of S-CFP is better than that of I-CFP, while the O-CFP has the best safety performance. The optimized parameters in the ACC/CACC models are diverse and different from the default parameters, indicating that the best model parameters vary with different car-following scenarios. Findings of this study provide a valuable perspective to reduce the rear-end collision risks.
引用
收藏
页码:2790 / 2802
页数:13
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] A Car-Following Model Based on Trajectory Data for Connected and Automated Vehicles to Predict Trajectory of Human-Driven Vehicles
    Qu, Dayi
    Wang, Shaojie
    Liu, Haomin
    Meng, Yiming
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (12)
  • [2] Optimizing longitudinal control model parameters of connected and automated vehicles using empirical trajectory data of human drivers in risky car-following scenarios基于人类驾驶员在跟车高风险情景中的经验轨迹数据优化 智能网联车辆纵向控制模型参数
    Lu Xing
    Dan Wu
    You-yi Tang
    Ye Li
    Journal of Central South University, 2023, 30 : 2790 - 2802
  • [3] Trust-Aware Control of Automated Vehicles in Car-Following Interactions with Human Drivers
    Ozkan, Mehmet Fatih
    Ma, Yao
    2022 IEEE 61ST CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL (CDC), 2022, : 5279 - 5284
  • [4] Human-machine cooperative scheme for car-following control of the connected and automated vehicles
    Chen, Jin
    Sun, Dihua
    Li, Yang
    Zhao, Min
    Liu, Weining
    Jin, Shuang
    PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2021, 573
  • [5] Platoon or individual: An adaptive car-following control of connected and automated vehicles
    Zong, Fang
    Yue, Sheng
    Zeng, Meng
    He, Zhengbing
    Ngoduy, Dong
    CHAOS SOLITONS & FRACTALS, 2025, 191
  • [6] Calibration of the Gipps car-following model using trajectory data
    Vasconcelos, Luis
    Neto, Luis
    Santos, Silvia
    Silva, Ana Bastos
    Seco, Alvaro
    17TH MEETING OF THE EURO WORKING GROUP ON TRANSPORTATION, EWGT2014, 2014, 3 : 952 - 961
  • [7] CAR-FOLLOWING MODEL OF CONNECTED CRUISE CONTROL VEHICLES TO MITIGATE TRAFFIC OSCILLATIONS
    Qin, Yan-Yan
    Wang, Hao
    Chen, Quan
    Ran, Bin
    PROMET-TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION, 2019, 31 (06): : 603 - 610
  • [8] Car-Following Model Comparisons in Free Flow Scenarios Based on Empirical Data
    Li, Ruijie
    Li, Linbo
    Wang, Wenxuan
    CICTP 2022: INTELLIGENT, GREEN, AND CONNECTED TRANSPORTATION, 2022, : 1446 - 1457
  • [9] Characterizing car-following behaviors of human drivers when following automated vehicles using the real-world dataset
    Wen, Xiao
    Cui, Zhiyong
    Jian, Sisi
    ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2022, 172
  • [10] Stability and extension of a car-following model for human-driven connected vehicles
    Sun, Jie
    Zheng, Zuduo
    Sharma, Anshuman
    Sun, Jian
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2023, 155