Repurposing of fluoxetine for antibacterial activities in catheter-associated urinary tract biofilm infections: an in vitro analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Poyil, Muhammad Musthafa [1 ]
Shafqat, Rameesha [2 ]
Alfaki, Mamoun A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz Univ, Coll Med, Dept Basic Med Sci, Al Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia
[2] Dow Univ Hlth Sci, Karachi 74200, Pakistan
关键词
Biofilms; catheter-associated urinary tract infections; fluoxetine; repurposing; ANTIBIOTIC-RESISTANCE; ESCHERICHIA-COLI;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Urinary tract infections are often initiated by indwelling catheters and bring about serious consequences, especially when they are caused by multidrug-resistant bacterial pathogens. The biofilms of uropathogens such as Enterococcus faecalis and Escherichia coli pose serious challenges. Therefore the scientific world is trying to experiment with alternative drugs to replace conventional antibiotics as the latter are more prone to cause the development of antibacterial resistance. Here, we evaluate the repurposing of the antidepressant fluoxetine as an antibacterial agent against the mentioned pathogens. METHODS To repurpose fluoxetine for its antibacterial activity against Enterococcus faecalis and Escherichia coli, the agar diffusion method was used. The minimal inhibitory concentration was found by the microdilution method. The drug was also analyzed as a coating on catheters to evaluate its efficiency against biofilm formation by pathogens. RESULTS The drug fluoxetine showed potential antibacterial and anti-biofilm activities. Its minimum inhibitory concentration was found to be 18.75 & mu;g/ mL and 37.5 & mu;g/mL against Enterococcus faecalis and Escherichia coli respectively. The antibiofilm activity on polystyrene surfaces was also remarkable as it reduced the formation of Enterococcus faecalis and Escherichia coli biofilms by 70% and 74%, after being treated with 1x MICs and 2x MICs respectively. CONCLUSIONS Fluoxetine one of the drugs of choice in treating depression, when repurposed, has shown considerable antibacterial and antibiofilm effects against two of the major catheter-associated urinary tract infection-causing bacteria viz. Enterococcus faecalis and Escherichia coli. Therefore, further studies are needed to understand its applicability as an antibacterial agent.
引用
收藏
页码:128 / 136
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An in vitro urinary tract catheter system to investigate biofilm development in catheter-associated urinary tract infections
    Dohnt, Katrin
    Sauer, Marie
    Mueller, Maren
    Atallah, Karin
    Weidemann, Marina
    Gronemeyer, Petra
    Rasch, Detlev
    Tielen, Petra
    Krull, Rainer
    JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS, 2011, 87 (03) : 302 - 308
  • [2] Review of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections and In Vitro Urinary Tract Models
    Cortese, Yvonne J.
    Wagner, Victoria E.
    Tierney, Morgan
    Devine, Declan
    Fogarty, Andrew
    JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE ENGINEERING, 2018, 2018
  • [3] Catheter-associated urinary tract infections
    Liedl, B.
    UROLOGE, 2015, 54 (09): : 1301 - 1308
  • [4] Catheter-associated urinary tract infections
    Warren, JW
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2001, 17 (04) : 299 - 303
  • [5] Catheter-associated Urinary Tract Infections
    Tenke, Peter
    Mezei, Tunde
    Bode, Imre
    Koves, Bela
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2017, 16 (04) : 138 - 143
  • [6] Catheter-associated urinary tract infections
    Warren, JW
    INFECTIOUS DISEASE CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1997, 11 (03) : 609 - +
  • [7] Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections
    Keten, Derya
    Aktas, Firdevs
    KLIMIK JOURNAL, 2014, 27 (02) : 38 - 47
  • [8] Antimicrobials: catheter-associated urinary tract infections
    不详
    JAC-ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE, 2020, 2 (01):
  • [9] Prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections
    Becher, K. F.
    Nitschmann, S.
    INTERNIST, 2017, 58 (01): : 100 - 102
  • [10] Prevention of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections
    Piechota, H.
    AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 2016, 47 (03) : 220 - 228