Investigation of High School Students' Graph Drawing Levels for Force and Motion

被引:0
|
作者
Atar, Betul Seyma Yeltekin [1 ]
Aykutlu, Isil [1 ]
机构
[1] Hacettepe Univ, Ankara, Turkiye
关键词
Force and motion; Level of graph drawing; Line graph; High school students; LOGICAL THINKING; DIFFICULTIES; CONSTRUCT; INTERPRET; PHYSICS;
D O I
10.9779/pauefd.1202430
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
"Force and motion" is one of the subjects of physics classes that includes the most graphs. Enabling one to understand the relationship between variables, graphs have an important place in physics courses. A total of 209 11th grade students at an Anatolian High School participated in this study which was carried out to determine graphs drawing levels of high school students related to force and motion. A Graph Drawing Skill Form (GDSF) containing five open-ended questions was used as a data collection tool. In the analysis of students' graphs, an evaluation rubric was used, which was based on the scoring rubric designed by Tarakci (2016) with additional categories and criteria. To support the findings of the study, semi -structured interviews were carried out with 42 students (20% of the total). At the end of the study, it was determined that students had difficulty drawing the velocity-time, acceleration -time, and position-time graphs. Moreover, it was seen that students had errors and issues with naming the axis of graphs, writing down the data on the axis, creating a point, and drawing a curve graph. Based on the findings of the study, it is recommended that applications that require using more graphs should be part of the curriculum so that students have a better understanding of graphs used in physics. It is believed that using simulations or animations which present the graph, and the motion of the object simultaneously would be more effective in students' understanding of graphs in force and motion.
引用
收藏
页数:61
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Force and motion misconceptions' pliability, the case of Moroccan high school students
    Bouzid, Tariq
    Kaddari, Fatiha
    Darhmaoui, Hassane
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2022, 115 (02): : 122 - 132
  • [2] Investigation of aggression levels of anatolian and vocational high school students
    Yazici, Yakup
    Senduran, Fatih
    Emir, Esra
    [J]. REVISTA DE GESTAO E SECRETARIADO-GESEC, 2023, 14 (08): : 14615 - 14627
  • [3] Investigation of the Secondary Education Students' Conceptual Understanding Levels and Attitudes towards Force and Motion
    Cibik, Ayse Sert
    Bayram, Sumeyye
    Bezci, Kevser
    [J]. PEGEM EGITIM VE OGRETIM DERGISI, 2015, 5 (03): : 291 - 312
  • [4] Graph drawing in motion II
    Friedrich, C
    Houle, ME
    [J]. GRAPH DRAWING, 2002, 2265 : 220 - 231
  • [5] Levels of graph comprehension in primary and secondary school students
    Gabucio, Fernando
    Marti, Eduardo
    Enfedaque, Jesus
    Gilabert, Sandra
    Konstantinidou, Aikaterini
    [J]. CULTURA Y EDUCACION, 2010, 22 (02): : 183 - 197
  • [6] Assessing graph interpretation of high school students: an examination by students' gender
    Riani, V. R.
    Sa'diyah, L. H.
    Purwanto, M. G.
    Ramalis, T. R.
    Samsudin, A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE EDUCATION (ICMSCE) 2020, 2021, 1806
  • [7] GRAPH DRAWING BY FORCE-DIRECTED PLACEMENT
    FRUCHTERMAN, TMJ
    REINGOLD, EM
    [J]. SOFTWARE-PRACTICE & EXPERIENCE, 1991, 21 (11): : 1129 - 1164
  • [8] Development of Force and Motion Concept Self-Efficacy Inventory (FMCSEI) for Senior High School Students
    Panergayo, Albert Andry E.
    [J]. JURNAL PENELITIAN DAN PEMBELAJARAN IPA, 2023, 9 (02): : 194 - 213
  • [9] Conceptual development about motion and force in elementary and middle school students
    Dykstra, Dewey I., Jr.
    Sweet, Dale R.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2009, 77 (05) : 468 - 476
  • [10] Investigation of Elementary-School Students' Perception of Engineering using Drawing Analysis
    Chiang, Feng-Kuang
    Li, Li
    Cai, Rui Heng
    Wang, Shan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2020, 36 (01) : 241 - 255