Hyperlocal air pollution in an urban environment- measured with low-cost sensors

被引:4
|
作者
Frederickson, Louise Boge [7 ]
Russell, Hugo Savill [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Fessa, Dafni [1 ,2 ]
Khan, Jibran [1 ,2 ]
Schmidt, Johan Albrecht [6 ]
Johnson, Matthew Stanley [3 ,4 ,6 ]
Hertel, Ole [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Dept Environm Sci, Frederiksborgvej 399, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ, Danish Big Data Ctr Environm & Hlth BERTHA, Frederiksborgvej 399, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark
[3] AirScape, 88 Baker St, London W1U 6TQ, England
[4] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Chem, Univ Pk 5, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[5] Aarhus Univ, Fac Tech Sci, Frederiksborgvej 399, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark
[6] DevLabs, Nannasgade 28, DK-2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
[7] Aarhus Univ, Dept Environm Sci, Roskilde, Denmark
关键词
Low-cost sensors; Personal exposure monitoring; Hyperlocal air pollution; Urban air pollution; Pollution exposure; EXPOSURE MEASUREMENT; PERSONAL EXPOSURE; QUALITY SENSORS; GAS SENSORS; EXPOSOME; CALIBRATION; POLLUTANTS; NETWORKS; PARADIGM; LOCATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.uclim.2023.101684
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Air pollution levels can vary significantly over short distances, particularly in urban areas and near emission sources. This study examined the performance of low-cost sensor devices for monitoring levels of NO2, O-3, and PM2.5 along two closely spaced (average 8 m) routes in Copenhagen, Denmark. One route was located near a lake (Route 1) and the other near a busy road (Route 2). The routes were walked in tandem for 84 h. The mode of deployment was determined using an accelerometer, gyroscope, and light sensor, achieving a 97.4 % accuracy rate. Field calibration with multivariate linear regression proved the most robust calibration model across pollutants, yielding mean R-2-values of 0.64, 0.79, and 0.48 for NO2, O-3, and PM2.5, respectively. The sensor intervariability was generally low, with mean R-2-values of 0.84-0.94 for PM2.5 measured with optical particle sensors and 0.88-0.90 for NO2 and O-3 measured with metal oxide sensors. Results showed significantly higher NO2 concentrations on Route 2 (21.6 +/- 6.6 ppb) compared to Route 1 (10.1 +/- 4.0 ppb) during mornings. However, no significant differences in O-3 and PM2.5 concentrations were observed. Our findings demonstrate that low-cost sensors can accurately quantify air pollution exposure in urban areas with high spatiotemporal resolution.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Investigating the Sources of Urban Air Pollution Using Low-Cost Air Quality Sensors at an Urban Atlanta Site
    Yang, Laura Hyesung
    Hagan, David H.
    Rivera-Rios, Jean C.
    Kelp, Makoto M.
    Cross, Eben S.
    Peng, Yuyang
    Kaiser, Jennifer
    Williams, Leah R.
    Croteau, Philip L.
    Jayne, John T.
    Ng, Nga Lee
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 56 (11) : 7063 - 7073
  • [2] Calibration of a cluster of low-cost sensors for the measurement of air pollution in ambient air
    Spinelle, Laurent
    Gerboles, Michel
    Villani, Maria Gabriella
    Aleixandre, Manuel
    Bonavitacola, Fausto
    [J]. 2014 IEEE SENSORS, 2014, : 21 - 24
  • [3] MoreAir: A Low-Cost Urban Air Pollution Monitoring System
    Gryech, Ihsane
    Ben-Aboud, Yassine
    Guermah, Bassma
    Sbihi, Nada
    Ghogho, Mounir
    Kobbane, Abdellatif
    [J]. SENSORS, 2020, 20 (04)
  • [4] Assessing Inequitable Urban Heat Islands and Air Pollution Disparities with Low-Cost Sensors in Richmond, Virginia
    Eanes, Andre M.
    Lookingbill, Todd R.
    Hoffman, Jeremy S.
    Saverino, Kelly C.
    Fong, Stephen S.
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (23) : 1 - 18
  • [5] Urban vertical air pollution gradient and dynamics investigated with low-cost sensors and large-eddy simulations
    Frederickson, Louise B.
    Russell, Hugo S.
    Raasch, Siegfried
    Zhang, Zhaoxi
    Schmidt, Johan A.
    Johnson, Matthew S.
    Hertel, Ole
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 316
  • [6] Particulate air pollution in the Copenhagen metro part 2: Low-cost sensors and micro-environment classification
    Russell, Hugo S.
    Kappelt, Niklas
    Fessa, Dafni
    Frederickson, Louise B.
    Bagkis, Evangelos
    Apostolidis, Pantelis
    Karatzas, Kostas
    Schmidt, Johan A.
    Hertel, Ole
    Johnson, Matthew S.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 170
  • [7] On the Data Analysis of Participatory Air Pollution Monitoring Using Low-cost Sensors
    Fekih, Mohamed Anis
    Bechkit, Walid
    Rivano, Herve
    [J]. 26TH IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTERS AND COMMUNICATIONS (IEEE ISCC 2021), 2021,
  • [8] Design and Evaluation of a Reliable Low-Cost Atmospheric Pollution Station in Urban Environment
    Astudillo, Galo D.
    Garza-Castanon, Luis E.
    Minchala Avila, Luis I.
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 51129 - 51144
  • [9] Calibration of low-cost NO2 sensors in an urban air quality network
    van Zoest, Vera
    Osei, Frank B.
    Stein, Alfred
    Hoek, Gerard
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 210 : 66 - 75
  • [10] Measurement of air pollution with low-cost technology
    Munoz, Lilia
    Delgado, Jonaan
    Rodriguez, Vicente
    [J]. 2018 13TH IBERIAN CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES (CISTI), 2018,