Machine learning prediction of law enforcement officers' misconduct with general strain theory

被引:0
|
作者
Rahman, Rahayu Abdul [1 ]
Masrom, Suraya [2 ]
Ahmad, Jihadah [3 ]
Maryasih, Lilis [4 ]
Zakaria, Nor Balkish [5 ]
Nor, Mohd Auzan Md [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Teknol MARA, Fac Accountancy, Perak Branch, Tapah Campus, Shah Alam, Malaysia
[2] Univ Teknol MARA, Fac Comp & Math Sci, Perak Branch, Tapah Campus, Shah Alam, Malaysia
[3] Kolej Univ Polytech MARA, Fac Comp & Multimedia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
[4] Univ Syiah Kuala, Fac Econ & Business, Acheh, Indonesia
[5] Univ Teknol MARA, Accounting Res Inst, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
[6] Royal Malaysia Police, Commercial Crime Invest Div, Kuala Lumpur, Perak, Malaysia
关键词
Employee misconduct; Machine learning; Prediction; Police forces; prediction accuracy;
D O I
10.21833/ijaas.2023.01.007
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The main objective of this study is to develop a machine learning prediction model on employee misconduct that signals the failure of the integrity of law enforcement officers in performing their duties and responsibilities. Using a questionnaire survey of two hundred eighty-six participants, from senior officers to rank and file police officers, this study presents the fundamental knowledge on the design and implementation of a machine learning model based on four selected algorithms; generalized linear model, random forest, decision tree and support vector machine. In addition to demographic attributes, the performance of each machine learning algorithm on the employee's misconduct has been observed based on the attributes of general strain theory namely financial stress, work stress, leadership exposure, and peer pressure. The findings indicated that peer pressure was the most influencer in the prediction models of all machine learning algorithms. However, random forest is the most outperformed algorithm in terms of
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 54
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prediction of Serious Misconduct in Law Enforcement Officers
    Twibell, Alec T.
    McGrath, Robert E.
    Guller, Matthew
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2022, 34 (09) : 838 - 845
  • [2] Prediction of dysfunctional job behaviors among law enforcement officers
    Sarchione, CD
    Cuttler, MJ
    Muchinsky, PM
    Nelson-Gray, RO
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 83 (06) : 904 - 912
  • [3] EMERGENCY ORGANIZATION OF E-LEARNING FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS
    Pyrchenkova, Galina
    Kozin, Mikhail
    Radchenko, Elena
    [J]. EDUCATION IN A CHANGING WORLD: GLOBAL CHALLENGES AND NATIONAL PRIORITIES, 2021, 114 : 234 - 241
  • [4] LEARNING POINTS FROM MURDERS OF CALIFORNIA LAW-ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS 1978
    MOORMAN, CB
    WEMMER, R
    [J]. POLICE CHIEF, 1979, 46 (10): : 74 - 75
  • [5] A Test of General Strain Theory on Police Officers’ Turnover Intention
    Hee S. Shim
    Youngoh Jo
    Larry T. Hoover
    [J]. Asian Journal of Criminology, 2015, 10 : 43 - 62
  • [6] A Test of General Strain Theory on Police Officers' Turnover Intention
    Shim, Hee S.
    Jo, Youngoh
    Hoover, Larry T.
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF CRIMINOLOGY, 2015, 10 (01) : 43 - 62
  • [7] Pseudofamilies, Misconduct, and the Utility of General Strain Theory in a Women's Prison
    Wulf-Ludden, Timbre
    [J]. WOMEN & CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 2016, 26 (04) : 233 - 259
  • [8] Effects of Social and Occupational Stress, and Physical Strain on Suicidal Ideation Among Law Enforcement Officers
    Beauchamp, Alaina M.
    Jetelina, Katelyn K.
    [J]. OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SCIENCE, 2022, 6 (01) : 131 - 147
  • [9] Effects of Social and Occupational Stress, and Physical Strain on Suicidal Ideation Among Law Enforcement Officers
    Alaina M. Beauchamp
    Katelyn K. Jetelina
    [J]. Occupational Health Science, 2022, 6 : 131 - 147
  • [10] Does prison strain lead to prison misbehavior? An application of general strain theory to inmate misconduct
    Morris, Robert G.
    Carriaga, Michael L.
    Diamond, Brie
    Piquero, Nicole Leeper
    Piquero, Alex R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 2012, 40 (03) : 194 - 201