Production pathways for profitability and valuing ecosystem services for willow coppice in intensive agricultural applications

被引:3
|
作者
Livingstone, David [1 ,5 ]
Smyth, Beatrice M. [1 ]
Sherry, Erin [2 ]
Murray, Simon T. [3 ]
Foley, Aoife M. [1 ,4 ]
Lyons, Gary A. [5 ]
Johnston, Christopher R. [5 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ Belfast, Sch Mech & Aerosp Engn, Ashby Bldg,Stranmillis Rd, Belfast BT95AH, North Ireland
[2] Agri Food & Biosci Inst, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX, North Ireland
[3] Queens Univ Belfast, CASE Ctr Adv Sustainable Energy, Sch Chem & Chem Engn, David Keir Bldg,Stranmillis Rd, Belfast BT7 1NN, North Ireland
[4] Trinity Coll Dublin, Civil Struct & Environm Engn, Dublin 2, Ireland
[5] Agri Food & Biosci Inst, Large Pk, Hillsborough BT26 6DR, North Ireland
关键词
SRC willow; Bioenergy; Dairy; Sustainable agriculture; Economics; Ecosystem services; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ENERGY; BIOMASS; BUFFERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.spc.2023.01.013
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Increasing agricultural sustainability is a key challenge facing the globe today. Energy crops, planted as riparian buffers are one way to support this, simultaneously mitigating water quality degradation and climate change. However, the economics of implementing such riparian buffer systems is under researched. Hence this work con-ducted a bottom-up economic analysis of willow coppice riparian buffers on a Northern Irish dairy farm, which is indicative of agricultural intensification across Europe. This work includes an economic assessment of a willow coppice riparian buffer strip, using harvested yield data from an established willow buffer site for the first time. It also considered the impact of harvesting technology on the economic performance of a willow coppice riparian buffer strip for the first time. The analysis considered three willow production pathways: 1) direct chip harvesting, 2) full-stem harvesting, and 3) a scenario with a guaranteed purchasing contract for fresh chip. Economic performance was considered using net present value over a 25-year plantation lifetime. The full-stem scenario provided the highest economic return over its lifetime with an average yearly net present value of 497 pound ha-1 (in pound sterling). This system was then considered for integration into a typical dairy farm, as-suming 5 % land usage and including government grants for establishing riparian zones. The result was a drop in value of 28 pound ha-1 yr-1 compared to a dairy-only scenario; however, per litre of milk the farm employing willow coppice riparian buffer strips outperformed a typical dairy farm both environmentally and economically. Further analysis considered a novel approach that included payments for ecosystem services in the economic analysis. This analysis found that the implementation of government payments for ecosystem services (nutrient removal) increased the economic return of the willow coppice riparian buffer system by 400 pound ha-1 yr-1, resulting in min-imal impact on the return from dairy land. (c) 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Institution of Chemical Engineers. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 291
页数:11
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Valuing ecosystem services in agricultural production in southwest Spain
    Thomasz, Esteban Otto
    Kasanzew, Andres
    Massot, Juan Miguel
    Garcia-Garcia, Agustin
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2024, 68
  • [2] Willow coppice in intensive agricultural applications to reduce strain on the food-energy-water nexus
    Livingstone, David
    Smyth, Beatrice M.
    Foley, Aoife M.
    Murray, Simon T.
    Lyons, Gary
    Johnston, Chris
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2021, 144
  • [3] Addressing rural decline by valuing agricultural ecosystem services and treating food production as a social contribution
    Singh, Surendra Pratap
    Singh, Vishal
    TROPICAL ECOLOGY, 2016, 57 (03) : 381 - 392
  • [4] Valuing the ecosystem services of cover crops: barriers and pathways forward
    Daryanto, Stefani
    Jacinthe, Pierre-Andre
    Fu, Bojie
    Zhao, Wenwu
    Wang, Lixin
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 270 : 76 - 78
  • [5] Valuing ecosystem services: A shadow price for net primary production
    Richmond, Amy
    Kaufmann, Robert K.
    Myneni, Ranga B.
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 64 (02) : 454 - 462
  • [6] Valuing cultural ecosystem services: Agricultural heritage in Chiloe island, southern Chile
    Barrena, Jose
    Nahuelhual, Laura
    Baez, Andrea
    Schiappacasse, Ignacio
    Cerda, Claudia
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2014, 7 : 66 - 75
  • [7] Valuing Ecosystem Services for Agricultural TFP: A Review of Best Practices, Challenges, and Recommendations
    Bostian, Moriah
    Lundgren, Tommy
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (05)
  • [8] Scenarios reveal pathways to sustain future ecosystem services in an agricultural landscape
    Qiu, Jiangxiao
    Carpenter, Stephen R.
    Booth, Eric G.
    Motew, Melissa
    Zipper, Samuel C.
    Kucharik, Christopher J.
    Chen, Xi
    Loheide, Steven P., II
    Seifert, Jenny
    Turner, Monica G.
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2018, 28 (01) : 119 - 134
  • [9] Water Ecosystem Services Footprint of agricultural production in Central Italy
    Pacetti, Tommaso
    Castelli, Giulio
    Schroeder, Boris
    Bresci, Elena
    Caporali, Enrica
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 797
  • [10] Valuing Multiple Eelgrass Ecosystem Services in Sweden: Fish Production and Uptake of Carbon and Nitrogen
    Cole, Scott G.
    Moksnes, Per-Olav
    FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2016, 2