Multishot Diffusion-Weighted MRI of the Breasts in the Supine vs. Prone Position

被引:1
|
作者
Moran, Catherine J. [1 ,4 ]
Middione, Matthew J. [1 ]
Mazzoli, Valentina [1 ]
McKay-Nault, Jessica A. [1 ]
Guidon, Arnaud [2 ]
Waheed, Uzma [1 ]
Rosen, Eric L. [1 ]
Poplack, Steven P. [1 ]
Rosenberg, Jarrett [1 ]
Ennis, Daniel B. [1 ]
Hargreaves, Brian A. [1 ,3 ]
Daniel, Bruce L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Radiol, Stanford, CA USA
[2] GE Healthcare, Global MR Applicat & Workflow, Boston, MA USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Stanford, CA USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Richard M Lucas Ctr Imaging, 1201 Welch Rd,Mail Code 5488, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
breast; supine; prone; DWI; multishot; INDUCED B0 FIELD; AVERAGE RISK; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.28582
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) may allow for breast cancer screening MRI without a contrast injection. Multishot methods improve prone DWI of the breasts but face different challenges in the supine position. Purpose: To establish a multishot DWI (msDWI) protocol for supine breast MRI and to evaluate the performance of supine vs. prone msDWI. Study Type: Prospective. Population: Protocol optimization: 10 healthy women (ages 22-56), supine vs. prone: 24 healthy women (ages 22-62) and five women (ages 29-61) with breast tumors. Field Strength/Sequence: 3-T, protocol optimization msDWI: free-breathing (FB) 2-shots, FB 4-shots, respiratory-triggered (RT) 2-shots, RT 4-shots, supine vs. prone: RT 4-shot msDWI, T2-weighted fast-spin echo. Assessment: Protocol optimization and supine vs. prone: three observers performed an image quality assessment of sharpness, aliasing, distortion (vs. T2), perceived SNR, and overall image quality (scale of 1-5). Apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) in fibroglandular tissue (FGT) and breast tumors were measured. Statistical Tests: Effect of study variables on dichotomized ratings (4/5 vs. 1/2/3) and FGT ADCs were assessed with mixed-effects logistic regression. Interobserver agreement utilized Gwet's agreement coefficient (AC). Lesion ADCs were assessed by Bland-Altman analysis and concordance correlation (rho(c)). P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Protocol optimization: 4-shots significantly improved sharpness and distortion; RT significantly improved sharpness, aliasing, perceived SNR, and overall image quality. FGT ADCs were not significantly different between shots (P = 0.812), FB vs. RT (P = 0.591), or side (P = 0.574). Supine vs. prone: supine images were rated significantly higher for sharpness, aliasing, and overall image quality. FGT ADCs were significantly higher supine; lesion ADCs were highly correlated (rho(c) = 0.92). Data Conclusion: Based on image quality, supine msDWI outperformed prone msDWI. Lesion ADCs were highly correlated between the two positions, while FGT ADCs were higher in the supine position.
引用
收藏
页码:951 / 962
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multishot diffusion-weighted FSE using PROPELLER MRI
    Pipe, JG
    Farthing, VG
    Forbes, KP
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2002, 47 (01) : 42 - 52
  • [2] Multishot diffusion-weighted SPLICE PROPELLER MRI of the abdomen
    Deng, Jie
    Omary, Reed A.
    Larson, Andrew C.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2008, 59 (05) : 947 - 953
  • [3] Inverse Reconstruction Method for Segmented Multishot Diffusion-Weighted MRI With Multiple Coils
    Uecker, Martin
    Karaus, Alexander
    Frahm, Jens
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2009, 62 (05) : 1342 - 1348
  • [4] Prone Vs. Supine Sleep Position in Bronchiolitis: Effects on Apnoea and Oxygenation
    Christian F Poets
    Tina Marinaki
    Valerie A Stebbens
    Louise M O'Brien
    David P Southall
    Pediatric Research, 1997, 42 (3) : 412 - 412
  • [5] A PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF INTRAFRACTION PROSTATE MOTION IN THE PRONE VS. SUPINE POSITION
    Wilder, Richard B.
    Chittenden, Lucy
    Mesa, Albert V.
    Bunyapanasarn, Jane
    Agustin, Jeff
    Lizarde, Jessica
    Ravera, John
    Tokita, Kenneth M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 77 (01): : 165 - 170
  • [6] Diffusion-weighted MRI
    Filippi, M
    Rocca, MA
    NEW FRONTIERS OF MR-BASED TECHNIQUES IN MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS, 2003, : 33 - 45
  • [7] Multishot diffusion-weighted FSE using PROPELLER MRI (vol 47, pg 42, 2002)
    Pipe, JG
    Farthing, VG
    Forbes, KP
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2002, 47 (03) : 621 - 621
  • [8] Lung Tissue Deformation Controls Redistribution of Inflation in Prone vs. Supine Position
    Xin, Y.
    Cereda, M.
    Hamedani, H.
    Tustison, N.
    Pourfathi, M.
    Siddiqui, S.
    Amzajerdian, F.
    Duncan, I.
    Loza, L.
    Achekzai, T.
    Baron, R.
    Profka, H.
    Kadlecek, S.
    Gee, J.
    Rizi, R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2020, 201
  • [9] Prospective comparison of the optimal radiation technique with mamma carcinoma:: supine position vs. prone position
    Petersen, C.
    Wuerschmidt, F.
    Dahle, J.
    Bastian, C.
    Kretschmer, M.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2008, 184 : 135 - 135
  • [10] Multishot diffusion-weighted PROPELLER magnetic resonance imaging of the abdomen
    Deng, Jie
    Miller, Frank H.
    Salem, Riad
    Omary, Reed A.
    Larson, Andrew C.
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2006, 41 (10) : 769 - 775