Comparison of clinical performance of Ambu® AuraGain™ and BlockBuster® in anaesthetised preschool children-A randomised controlled trial

被引:1
|
作者
Gaur, Yashshwani [1 ]
Jaju, Rishabh [2 ]
Paliwal, Naveen [1 ]
Choudhary, Usha [1 ]
Bihani, Pooja [1 ]
Janweja, Sarita [1 ]
机构
[1] S N Med Coll, Dept Anaesthesiol, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
[2] AIIMS, Dept Anaesthesiol, Deogarh, Jharkhand, India
关键词
Airway management; anaesthesia; laryngeal mask airway; paediatric; oropharyngeal seal pressure; LMA BlockBuster (R); Ambu (R) AuraGain (TM); INTUBATING LARYNGEAL AIRWAY; TRACHEAL INTUBATION; I-GEL; EFFICACY; ADULTS; MASK;
D O I
10.4103/ija.ija_286_22
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background and Aims: Supraglottic airway (SGA) devices are a boon to paediatric airway management. The clinical performances of the BlockBuster (R) laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and Ambu (R) AuraGain (TM) in preschool children were compared in this study. Methods: After ethical approval and trial registration, this randomised controlled study was conducted on 50 children, aged 1-4 years, randomised into two groups. Appropriate sized Ambu (R) AuraGain (TM) (group A) and LMA BlockBuster (R) (group B) were placed as per the manufacturer's recommendation under general anaesthesia. Appropriate size of the endotracheal tube was then chosen and inserted through the device. Primary objective of the study was to compare the oropharyngeal seal pressure (OSP), and secondary objectives were the first attempt intubation success rate, overall intubation success rate, SGA insertion time, intubation time, haemodynamic changes and postoperative pharyngolaryngeal complications. The Chi-square test was used to analyse the categorical variables, while the intragroup comparison of mean changes in outcomes was evaluated by the unpaired t-test. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05. Results: Demographic parameters were uniformly distributed in both the groups. The mean OSP in group A was 26.6 +/- 0.95 cm H2O and in group B was 29.08 +/- 0.75 cm H2O. Both the devices were successfully inserted in all the patients. The success rate of blind endotracheal intubation through the device in first attempt was 4% in group A and 80% in group B. Postoperative pharyngolaryngeal complications were relatively less in group B. Conclusion: LMA BlockBuster (R) provides higher OSP and provides a higher success rate of blind endotracheal intubation in paediatric patients.
引用
收藏
页码:420 / 425
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Comparison of Tracheal Intubation with Ambu® AuraGain™, Fastrach® and BlockBuster® Laryngeal Mask Airway: A Randomised Clinical Trial
    Raiger, L. K.
    Sharma, Bhawesh
    Gehlot, Ravindra Kumar
    Dhania, Swati
    Meena, Hemant Kumar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2022, 16 (09) : UC14 - UC18
  • [2] Comparison of the clinical performance of i-gel and Ambu AuraGain in children A randomised noninferiority clinical trial
    Mihara, Takahiro
    Nakayama, Rika
    Ka, Koui
    Goto, Takahisa
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2019, 36 (06) : 411 - 417
  • [3] Randomised comparison of the clinical performance of Ambu Auragain and Teleflex LMA Protector
    Goravanchil, F.
    Cernyl, J.
    Kowalskil, A. M.
    Keel, S. S.
    Rebellol, E.
    Frenchl, K. E.
    Frenzel, J. C.
    Syedl, T. A.
    Burnett, T.
    Hernandez, M., Jr.
    Hagberg, C. A.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2020, 125 (01) : E208 - E208
  • [4] Ventilatory performance of AMBU® AuraGain™ and LMA® Supreme™ in laparoscopic surgery: A randomised controlled trial
    Zhang, Jinbin
    Drakeford, Paul A.
    Ng, Vicky
    Seng, Zhiquan
    Chua, Maureen
    Tan, Norman
    Mathew, David
    Teoh, Wendy H.
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2021, 49 (05) : 395 - 403
  • [5] A randomised comparison of the Ambu® AuraGain and the LMA® supreme in infants and children
    Jagannathan, N.
    Hajduk, J.
    Sohn, L.
    Huang, A.
    Sawardekar, A.
    Gebhardt, E. R.
    Johnson, K.
    De Oliveira, G. S.
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 2016, 71 (02) : 205 - 212
  • [6] Comparison of clinical performance of Baska mask and Ambu AuraGain in patients undergoing surgery: A single-blinded, randomised comparative trial
    Raman, Rajesh
    Prabha, Rati
    Rampal, Surbhi
    Tiwari, Tanmay
    Gautam, Shefali
    Prakash, Ravi
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2023, 67 (SUPPL 4) : S227 - S231
  • [7] Comparison of Ambu AuraGain and BlockBuster laryngeal mask for controlled ventilation in children undergoing minor surgical procedures under general anesthesia: A prospective randomized controlled study
    Kumar, Kanil Ranjith
    Soni, Lipika
    Sinha, Renu
    Muthiah, Thilaka
    Patel, Nishant
    Shende, Dilip K.
    Subramaniam, Rajeshwari
    [J]. PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2023, 33 (06) : 474 - 480
  • [8] A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL COMPARING THE CLINICAL PERFORMANCE OF AMBU AURAGAIN AND I-GEL IN YOUNG PEDIATRIC PATIENTS
    Koh, Wonuk
    Kim, Ha-Jung
    Park, Hee-Sun
    Ro, Young Jin
    Yang, Hong-Seuk
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2019, 128 : 25 - 27
  • [9] Comparison of insertion characteristics of LMA ProSeal and Ambu AuraGain in adult patients under controlled ventilation: A randomised study
    Salhotra, Rashmi
    Padhy, Anurag
    Rautela, Rajesh S.
    Singh, Deepak
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2023, 67 (05) : 426 - 431
  • [10] Clinical Performance of I-gel versus Ambu AuraGain in Paediatric Patients undergoing General Anaesthesia: A Randomised Clinical Study
    Grewal, Tejinderpal kaur
    Kumar, Parmod
    Dhamija, Reeva
    Kaur, Simrit
    Kaur, Gurlivleen
    Kundra, Tanveer singh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2023, 17 (11) : UC27 - UC32