Study on multicomponent Amplitude Versus Offset forward modelling of thin layer gas hydrate using the Brekhovskikh equation

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, Jin [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Gao, Junjie [3 ]
Wang, Linfei [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Dong, Boyi [3 ]
Cai, Zhengkun [3 ]
Cheng, Ruodan [3 ]
机构
[1] Ocean Univ China, Coll Marine Geo Sci, Key Lab Submarine Geosci & Prospecting Tech, Qingdao, Peoples R China
[2] Qingdao Natl Lab Marine Sci & Technol, Lab Marine Mineral Resources, Qingdao, Peoples R China
[3] Ocean Univ China, Coll Marine Geosci, Qingdao, Peoples R China
[4] Ocean Univ China, Frontiers Sci Ctr Deep Ocean Multispheres & Earth, Qingdao, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Amplitude Versus Offset (AVO) forward modelling; gas hydrate; the Brekhovskikh equation; SHENHU AREA; SEISMIC DATA; DOWNHOLE LOG; IDENTIFICATION; SEDIMENTS;
D O I
10.1111/1365-2478.13375
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Amplitude Versus Offset forward modelling plays a crucial role in identifying gas hydrate reservoirs. However, since gas hydrates commonly exist in thin intermediate seafloor layers, traditional Amplitude Versus Offset techniques based on the Zoeppritz equation with the semi-infinite medium assumption may not accurately depict the reflection amplitude of hydrates. In this paper, multi-component Amplitude Versus Offset forward modelling using the Brekhovskikh equation was performed to simulate the Amplitude Versus Offset response of thin-layered gas hydrate reservoirs more accurately. The numerical experiments demonstrate that the overall trends of the P-wave and S-wave Amplitude Versus Offset curves calculated by the Brekhovskikh equation and the Zoeppritz equation are consistent under various reservoir thicknesses, porosities and hydrate saturations, but the Amplitude Versus Offset curves calculated by the Brekhovskikh equation reveal more details. When the angle is greater than 30 & DEG;, the gradient of the P-wave Amplitude Versus Offset curve calculated from the Brekhovskikh equation as a function of hydrate saturation and porosity is greater than that calculated by the Zoeppritz equation, whereas the S-wave Amplitude Versus Offset is not sensitive to changes in hydrate reservoir parameters. To further validate the Brekhovskikh equation in practical Amplitude Versus Offset analysis of gas hydrates, a geological model of gas hydrates is established based on logging data in the South China Sea. Subsequently, the bottom simulation reflection Amplitude Versus Offset of the P-wave was computed using the Brekhovskikh equation and the Zoeppritz equation. Comparison with the actual vertical cable seismic data indicates that the Amplitude Versus Offset curve using Brekhovskikh equation is more consistent with the amplitude trend than the Zoeppritz equation. This finding suggests that the Brekhovskikh equation holds great potential for establishing an Amplitude Versus Offset identification marker for gas hydrates and improving seismic data interpretation in gas hydrate exploration.
引用
收藏
页码:1350 / 1361
页数:12
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Identification of interbedded gas hydrate and free gas using amplitude versus offset forward modelling
    Liu, Bo
    Wang, Xiujuan
    Su, Pibo
    Li, Qingping
    Wan, Xiaoming
    Li, Jie
    Li, Yuanping
    Zhou, Jilin
    Jin, Jiapeng
    Sun, Luyi
    GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 2024, 72 (04) : 1536 - 1552
  • [2] Estimating gas saturation in a thin layer by using frequency-dependent amplitude versus offset modelling
    Jin, Zhaoyu
    Chapman, Mark
    Wu, Xiaoyang
    Papageorgiou, Giorgos
    GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 2017, 65 (03) : 747 - 765
  • [3] Amplitude variation with offset responses for gas hydrate/free gas models: a case study
    Shankar, Uma
    Sain, Kalachand
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2012, 103 (04): : 413 - 419
  • [4] THIN-LAYER ANALYSIS USING OFFSET-AMPLITUDE DATA
    HINDLET, FJF
    MCDONALD, JA
    GEOPHYSICS, 1987, 52 (03) : 413 - 413
  • [5] Effective method of detecting oil and gas reservoir using amplitude versus offset
    Key Laboratory of Geophysical Exploration, PetroChina, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China
    不详
    Zhongguo Shiyou Daxue Xuebao (Ziran Kexue Ban), 2007, 2 (41-44+50):
  • [6] Three-Dimensional Amplitude versus Offset Analysis for Gas Hydrate Identification at Woolsey Mound: Gulf of Mexico
    Alam, Saiful
    Knapp, Camelia
    Knapp, James
    GEOHAZARDS, 2024, 5 (01): : 271 - 285
  • [7] Amplitude versus offset (AVO) modelling and analysis for quantitative interpretation of porosity and saturation: A case study for Sawan gas field, middle Indus basin, Pakistan
    Rizwan, Muhammad
    Akhter, Gulraiz
    Mustafa, Ali
    Bin Nisar, Umair
    Ashfaq, Khawar
    GEOFISICA INTERNACIONAL, 2018, 57 (02): : 151 - 160
  • [8] Cavitation modelling using real gas state equation: A conceptual study
    Hanimann, L.
    Mangani, L.
    Casartelli, E.
    Darwish, M.
    Claramunt, K.
    30TH IAHR SYMPOSIUM ON HYDRAULIC MACHINERY AND SYSTEMS (IAHR 2020), 2021, 774
  • [9] Identification of pore-filling gas hydrate deposits in marine sediments based on amplitude-versus-angle study
    Tian, Dongmei
    Yang, Shengxiong
    Liu, Xuewei
    ENERGY REPORTS, 2021, 7 : 8368 - 8377
  • [10] Amplitude versus offset attribute inversion method for characterizing gas hydrate: Insights from high resolution seismic imaging and drilling results in the Shenhu area, South China Sea
    Zhang, Xudong
    Zeng, Fanxiang
    Jiang, Wenbin
    Meng, Dajiang
    Yan, Sheng
    GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 2024,