A multi-species catch reduces risk and enhances stability in the fishery? Implications from a portfolio analysis of the Hokkaido setnet fishery

被引:0
|
作者
Nakamura, Kohsuke [1 ]
Abe, Keita [2 ]
Ishimura, Gakushi [1 ]
机构
[1] Iwate Univ, Resource Econ & Policy Grp, Morioka, Japan
[2] Musashi Univ, Fac Econ, Tokyo, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Large-scale setnet fishery; Multi-species fishery; Fishery portfolio analysis;
D O I
10.1007/s12562-022-01656-4
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
The large-scale setnet fishery is a traditional multispecies fishery in Japan. This fishery is vital to the seafood industry to maintain stable annual landing volume and create employment in coastal areas. The 2018 fisheries policy reforms decided to expand the total allowable catch (TAC) managed species and introduce single-species-based fishing quotas. Such quantitative management may lead to landing regulation on specific species, potentially destabilizing revenue of the large-scale setnet fishery as the multispecies fishery. This study has quantified the impact of landing regulation on specific species due to the management measures of single-species-based fishing quotas on revenue of the large-scale setnet fishery in Hakodate, Hokkaido, by applying the fishery portfolio analysis. The results show that, when landing regulation on Japanese flying squid Todarodes pacificus, not only is average revenue reduced by about 52%, but the revenue risk increased by about 120%, and the portfolio effect decreased from 8.1 to 3.5 compared with the case without landing regulation. These results indicate that landing regulation on specific species due to the management measures of single-species-based fishing quotas not only reduces average revenue but also destabilizes revenue from the large-scale setnet fishery.
引用
收藏
页码:415 / 427
页数:13
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] A multi-species catch reduces risk and enhances stability in the fishery? Implications from a portfolio analysis of the Hokkaido setnet fishery
    Kohsuke Nakamura
    Keita Abe
    Gakushi Ishimura
    [J]. Fisheries Science, 2023, 89 : 415 - 427
  • [2] Drivers and implications of change in an inshore multi-species fishery
    Henly, Lauren
    Stewart, James E.
    Simpson, Stephen D.
    [J]. ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 2021, 78 (05) : 1815 - 1825
  • [3] The relationship between multi-species catch and effort: Among fishery comparisons
    Halls, AS
    Welcomme, RL
    Burn, RW
    [J]. FISHERIES RESEARCH, 2006, 77 (01) : 78 - 83
  • [4] Post-Capture Survival and Implications for By-Catch in a Multi-Species Coastal Gillnet Fishery
    Bell, Justin David
    Lyle, Jeremy Martin
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (11):
  • [5] Determining primary and companion species in a multi-species fishery: Implications for TAC setting
    Klaer, Neil L.
    Smith, David C.
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2012, 36 (03) : 606 - 612
  • [6] Management implications of discarding in an estuarine multi-species gill net fishery
    Gray, CA
    [J]. FISHERIES RESEARCH, 2002, 56 (02) : 177 - 192
  • [7] Catch Composition and Selectivity of Fishing Gears in a Multi-Species Indonesian Coral Reef Fishery
    Humphries, Austin T.
    Gorospe, Kelvin D.
    Carvalho, Paul G.
    Yulianto, Irfan
    Kartawijaya, Tasrif
    Campbell, Stuart J.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2019, 6
  • [8] A network approach to by-catch in a multi-species Mediterranean small-scale fishery
    Dimitriadis, Caterina
    Ines Borthagaray, Ana
    Vilela, Raul
    Casadevall, Margarida
    Carranza, Alvar
    [J]. FISHERIES RESEARCH, 2016, 173 : 273 - 281
  • [9] The effect of quota portfolio composition on optimal harvest strategy and profitability in a multi-species fishery
    Alizadeh Ashrafi, Tannaz
    Hermansen, Oystein
    Kvamsdal, Sturla F.
    [J]. ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 2023, 80 (08) : 2099 - 2113
  • [10] Catch-quota balancing mechanisms in the Icelandic multi-species demersal fishery: Are all species equal?
    Woods, Pamela J.
    Bouchard, Caroline
    Holland, Daniel S.
    Punt, Andre E.
    Marteinsdottir, Guorun
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2015, 55 : 1 - 10