Explainable tweet credibility ranker: A comprehensive credibility solution

被引:2
|
作者
Qureshi, Khubaib Ahmed [1 ]
Malick, Rauf Ahmed Shams [2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Business Management, Karachi, Pakistan
[2] Natl Univ Comp & Emerging Sci, Karachi, Pakistan
关键词
Tweet credibility; Explainable credibility; Explainable model; Credibility model; Automatic credibility assessment; Credibility dataset; SOCIAL MEDIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.compeleceng.2023.109028
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
It is observed that previous credibility assessment studies missed some important concepts of credibility. Their data was self-extracted and annotated only on the basis of basic human perception. Their decision was not explainable and led to dissatisfaction. The study attempted to accomplish all these objectives through an explainable and comprehensive credibility solution. The solution adheres to all necessary concepts of credibility presented in the microblog credibility framework and ranks the tweet from 0 to 5. The decision is also explainable to the user. The standard dataset is used with further credibility ranking, which is done by the experts using guided annotation. Despite the known trade-off that exists between accuracy and explainability, we have used all those models which produce high accuracy but our solution is also explainable. Light GBM performed the best. Results are also compared with baselines, which demonstrate that our method produced good results with an Acc. of 99.4.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Tweet Credibility Ranker: A Credibility Features' Fusion Model
    Qureshi, Khubaib Ahmed
    Malick, Rauf Ahmed Shams
    COGNITIVE COMPUTATION, 2025, 17 (01)
  • [2] Assessment of Tweet Credibility with LDA Features
    Ito, Jun
    Toda, Hiroyuki
    Koike, Yoshimasa
    Song, Jing
    Oyama, Satoshi
    WWW'15 COMPANION: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 24TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WORLD WIDE WEB, 2015, : 953 - 958
  • [3] URL-Based Tweet Credibility Evaluation
    Slimi, Hamda
    Bounhas, Ibrahim
    Slimani, Yahya
    2019 IEEE/ACS 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS (AICCSA 2019), 2019,
  • [4] Tweet Credibility Analysis Evaluation by Improving Sentiment Dictionary
    Kawabe, Takashi
    Namihira, Yoshimi
    Suzuki, Kouta
    Nara, Munehiro
    Sakurai, Yoshitaka
    Tsuruta, Setsuo
    Knauf, Rainer
    2015 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION (CEC), 2015, : 2354 - 2361
  • [5] Linked Credibility Reviews for Explainable Misinformation Detection
    Denaux, Ronald
    Manuel Gomez-Perez, Jose
    SEMANTIC WEB - ISWC 2020, PT I, 2020, 12506 : 147 - 163
  • [6] CredRank: Evaluating Tweet Credibility during High Impact Events
    Jain, Puneet
    Singh, Vikram
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2016 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTEMPORARY COMPUTING AND INFORMATICS (IC3I), 2016, : 553 - 557
  • [7] Building Credibility with Comprehensive Citation Practices
    Subramanian, Pavithra
    Soundararajan, Raghuraman
    Makol, Jyotsna
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND IMAGING, 2025, 35 : S95 - S101
  • [8] DIMENSIONS OF COMMUNICATOR CREDIBILITY - OBLIQUE SOLUTION
    TUPPEN, CJS
    SPEECH MONOGRAPHS, 1974, 41 (03): : 253 - 260
  • [9] eWOM credibility: a comprehensive framework and literature review
    Verma, Deepak
    Dewani, Prem Prakash
    ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW, 2021, 45 (03) : 481 - 500
  • [10] Examining the effects of celebrity trust on advertising credibility, brand credibility and corporate credibility
    Hussain, Shahzeb
    Melewar, T. C.
    Priporas, Constantinos-Vasilios
    Foroudi, Pantea
    Dennis, Charles
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2020, 109 : 472 - 488