Inter-rater reliability in the assessment of consciousness in patients receiving palliative care in intensive care: A prospective cross sectional observational study

被引:0
|
作者
Yildirim, Dilek [1 ,6 ]
Kavala, Arzu [1 ]
Oz, Seda Degirmenci [2 ]
Sezer, Esra [3 ]
Kugu, Emre [4 ]
Coskun, Zeynep [5 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Aydin Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Nursing, Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Nursing Adm, Zonguldak, Turkiye
[3] Acibadem Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Nursing, Istanbul, Turkiye
[4] Fenerbahce Univ, Vocat Sch Hlth Serv, Dept Med Serv & Techn, Istanbul, Turkiye
[5] Istanbul Aydin Univ, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Istanbul, Turkiye
[6] Istanbul Aydin Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Nursing, Florya Campus Halit Aydin Campus Inonu St 38 Sefak, Kucukcekmece, Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
care management; consciousness; Glasgow Coma Scale; intensive care; palliative care; GLASGOW COMA SCALE; AGREEMENT; NURSES; SCORES;
D O I
10.1111/nicc.13065
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) is one of the methods that has validity for evaluating the consciousness levels of patients in the literature and is accepted by health authorities.AimThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the inter-rater reliability of GCS in intensive care patients receiving palliative care.Study DesignA prospective cross sectional observational study. The study was conducted in a general intensive care unit with 20 beds with patients receiving palliative care. In the unit, 18 nurses worked in two shifts, day and night. Each patient's primary palliative care nurse and two additional researchers were given one minute to independently record the patient's GCS total and subscale scores. All observations were completed within 5 min as there could be significant changes in the patient's GCS score during observations.ResultsA total of 258 assessments were completed. For the GCS total scoring, a moderate agreement was found between palliative care nurses and the first researcher-observer (49.0%) and also between palliative care nurses and the second researcher-observer (47.7%). In addition, there was a substantial agreement between the first and second researchers (78.9%) and also between all observers (61.5%) (all p = .001).ConclusionsAlthough there was a near-perfect agreement between the two researcher-observers, we found only moderate agreement among all observers (palliative care nurses and two researcher-observers) in the evaluation of GCS total and subscale scores.Relevance to Clinical PracticeWe found that lack of knowledge and training on the standardized use of GCS is still a problem for palliative and intensive care units. Because of the diversity of patients requiring GCS assessment in palliative care units, refresher training programs and hands-on workshops on consciousness assessment should be organized regularly for more experienced nurses.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Palliative Care Phase: Inter-rater reliability and acceptability in a national study
    Masso, Malcolm
    Allingham, Samuel Frederic
    Banfield, Maree
    Johnson, Claire Elizabeth
    Pidgeon, Tanya
    Yates, Patsy
    Eagar, Kathy
    [J]. PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2015, 29 (01) : 22 - 30
  • [2] Inter-Rater Reliability of a Pressure Injury Risk Assessment Scale for Home Care: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study
    Kohta, Masushi
    Ohura, Takehiko
    Tsukada, Kunio
    Nakamura, Yoshinori
    Sukegawa, Mishiho
    Kumagai, Eiko
    Kameda, Yuki
    Kitte, Toshihiro
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY HEALTHCARE, 2020, 13 : 2031 - 2041
  • [3] Inter-Rater Reliability of the Phase of Illness Tool in Pediatric Palliative Care
    Burke, Kimberley
    Coombes, Lucy H.
    Petruckevitch, Ann
    Anderson, Anna-Karenia
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2020, 37 (10): : 837 - 843
  • [4] Criterion validity and inter-rater reliability o a palliative care screening tool for patients admitted to an emergency department intensive care unit
    da Costa Ribeiro, Sabrina Correa
    de Carvalho, Ricardo Tavares
    Rocha, Juraci Aparecida
    Dias, Roger Daglius
    [J]. PALLIATIVE & SUPPORTIVE CARE, 2018, 16 (06) : 685 - 691
  • [5] The Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium: Translation and inter-rater reliability in a Danish pediatric intensive care unit
    Simonsen, Birgitte Yndgaard
    Lisby, Marianne
    Traube, Chani
    Skovby, Pernille
    [J]. ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2019, 63 (07) : 900 - 904
  • [6] Inter-rater reliability of descriptors for the classification of mucosal pressure injury: A prospective cross-sectional study
    Fitzgerald, Simone
    McTier, Lauren
    Whitehead, Christina
    Masters, Kristy
    Wynne, Rochelle
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN CRITICAL CARE, 2023, 36 (02) : 179 - 185
  • [7] Feasibility and Inter-rater Reliability of the Japanese Version of the Intensive Care Unit Mobility Scale
    Yasumura, Daisetsu
    Katsukawa, Hajime
    Matsuo, Ryu
    Kawano, Reo
    Taito, Shunsuke
    Liu, Keibun
    Hodgson, Carol
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (04)
  • [8] Inter-Rater Reliability of Delirium Screening of Infants in the Cardiac ICU: A Prospective, Observational Study
    Cleveland, Melissa
    Baute, Rebecca
    Clindaniel, Casey
    Hertz, Leesa
    Pond, Rachel
    Centers, Gabriela I.
    [J]. PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2023, 24 (03) : E147 - E155
  • [9] THE GMS SCORE FOR HYPOSPADIAS: PROSPECTIVE ASSESSMENT OF INTER-RATER RELIABILITY
    DeCaro, Jonathan
    Herrel, Lindsey
    Srinivasan, Arun
    Scherz, Hal
    Broecker, Bruce
    Kirsch, Andrew
    Smith, Edwin
    Leong, Traci
    Elmore, James
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (04): : E650 - E651
  • [10] Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of manual assessment of respiratory motion in patients with unilateral cervical radiculopathy: A cross-sectional study
    Yoosefinejad, Amin Kordi
    Yousefiyan, Raziyeh
    Nazari, Raziyeh
    Rezaei, Iman
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE, 2024, 51