Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Comparing Abrahamic Monotheistic Religions

被引:3
|
作者
Farid, Md Shaikh [1 ]
Tasnim, Sumaia [2 ]
机构
[1] Dhaka Univ, Dept World Relig & Culture, Dhaka, Bangladesh
[2] Dhaka Univ, Inst Business Adm, Dhaka, Bangladesh
关键词
In vitro fertilization; Religion; Gamete donation; Surrogacy; Sex selection; Assisted reproduction; GAMETE; ISSUES; SUNNI;
D O I
10.1007/s41649-022-00224-3
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The impact of culture and religion on sexual and reproductive health and behavior has been a developing area of study in contemporary time. Therefore, it is crucial for people using reproductive procedures to understand the religious and theological perspectives on issues relating to reproductive health. This paper compares different perspectives of three Abrahamic faiths, i.e., Judaism, Christianity, and Islam on ARTs. Procreation, family formation, and childbirth within the context of marriage have all been advocated by these three major religions of the world. Judaism permits the use of all assisted reproductive technologies when the oocyte and sperm come from the husband and wife, respectively. The different denominations of Christianity have diverse views on reproductive practices. Although the Vatican does not approve of assisted reproduction, Protestant, Anglican, and other religious groups are free to use it. ARTs are acceptable in Sunni Islam, although they can only be carried out if the couples are married. Shia Islam, however, permits third-party donations to married couples under specific restrictions. This comparison reveals that while the three major world religions utilize assisted reproduction in distinct ways, there are also many comparable aspects of each religion.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 67
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Comparing Abrahamic Monotheistic Religions
    Md Shaikh Farid
    Sumaia Tasnim
    [J]. Asian Bioethics Review, 2023, 15 : 53 - 67
  • [2] Abrahamic religions
    Engler, Steven
    [J]. ESTUDOS DE RELIGIAO, 2013, 27 (02): : 306 - 311
  • [3] Assisted Reproductive Technologies and World Religions: Implications for Couples Therapy
    Connor, Jennifer
    Sauer, Clint
    Doll, Kevin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FAMILY PSYCHOTHERAPY, 2012, 23 (02) : 83 - 98
  • [4] Humanism in monotheistic religions
    Chouraqui, Jean-Marc
    Gril, Denis
    Leblanc, Christophe
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF EDUCATION, 2014, 60 (03) : 407 - 425
  • [5] The great monotheistic religions
    Lavoie, JJ
    [J]. STUDIES IN RELIGION-SCIENCES RELIGIEUSES, 2000, 29 (02) : 266 - 266
  • [6] ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS AND MIDDLE EAST
    KRITZECK, J
    [J]. REVIEW OF POLITICS, 1970, 32 (02): : 232 - 235
  • [7] The Oxford Handbook of the Abrahamic Religions
    Uehlinger, Christoph
    [J]. NUMEN-INTERNATIONAL REVIEW FOR THE HISTORY OF RELIGIONS, 2020, 67 (04): : 403 - 409
  • [8] Conceptualizing Sacredness and the Divine: Comparing Adherents of Dharmic and Abrahamic Religions in the US and India
    Crane, Lauren S.
    Bano, Shabana
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 51 : 967 - 967
  • [9] Charity and Giving in Monotheistic Religions
    Lange, Armin
    David, Nora
    Plese, Zlatko
    Weigold, Matthias
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANCIENT JUDAISM, 2010, 1 (03) : 365 - 365
  • [10] The Oxford Handbook of the Abrahamic Religions
    Zellentin, Holger
    [J]. JOURNAL OF QURANIC STUDIES, 2018, 20 (02) : 119 - 124