Overestimation of Amphotericin B Resistance in Candida auris with Sensititre YeastOne Antifungal Susceptibility Testing: a Need for Adjustment for Correct Interpretation

被引:16
|
作者
Siopi, Maria [1 ]
Peroukidou, Ilektra [1 ]
Beredaki, Maria-Ioanna [1 ]
Spruijtenburg, Bram [2 ,3 ]
de Groot, Theun [2 ,3 ]
Meis, Jacques F. [2 ,3 ]
Vrioni, Georgia [4 ]
Tsakris, Athanasios [4 ]
Pournaras, Spyros [1 ]
Meletiadis, Joseph [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl & Kapodistrian Univ Athens, Attikon Univ Gen Hosp, Med Sch, Clin Microbiol Lab, Athens, Greece
[2] Canisius Wilhelmina Hosp, Dept Med Microbiol & Infect Dis, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Canisius Wilhelmina Hosp, Radboud Univ Med Ctr, Ctr Expertise Mycol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Natl & Kapodistrian Univ Athens, Med Sch, Dept Microbiol, Athens, Greece
来源
MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM | 2023年 / 11卷 / 03期
关键词
Candida auris; amphotericin B; Sensititre YeastOne; wild type upper limit value; antifungal susceptibility testing; resistance; epidemiological cutoff value; EPIDEMIOLOGIC CUTOFF VALUES; MANAGEMENT; GUIDELINE;
D O I
10.1128/spectrum.04431-22
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Significant variation in minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) has been reported for amphotericin B (AMB) and C. auris, depending on the antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST) method. Although the Sensititre YeastOne (SYO) is widely used in routine laboratory testing, data regarding its performance for the AFST of C. auris are scarce. We tested AMB against 65 C. auris clinical isolates with the SYO and the reference methodology by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). The essential agreement (EA, +/- 1 dilution) between the two methods and the categorical agreement (CA) based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)'s tentative breakpoint of MIC = 2 mg/L were determined. The SYO wild type upper limit value (WT-UL) was determined using the ECOFFinder. The modal (range) CLSI growth inhibitory MIC was lower than the SYO colorimetric MIC [1(0.25-1) versus 2(1-8) mg/L, respectively]). The CLSI-colorimetric SYO EA was 29% and the CA was 11% (89% major errors; MaE). MaE were reduced when the SYO WT-UL of 8 mg/L was used (0% MaE). Alternatively, the use of SYO growth inhibition endpoints of MIC-1 (75% growth inhibition) or MIC-2 (50% growth inhibition) resulted in 88% CA with 12% MaE and 97% CA with 3% MaE, respectively. In conclusion, SYO overestimated AMB resistance in C. auris isolates when colorimetric MICs, as per SYO instructions and the CDC breakpoint of 2 mg/L, were used. This can be improved either by using the method-specific WT-UL MIC of 8 mg/L for colorimetric MICs or by determining growth inhibition MIC endpoints, regardless of the color.IMPORTANCE Candida auris is an emerging and frequently multidrug-resistant fungal pathogen that accounts for life-threatening invasive infections and nosocomial outbreaks worldwide. Reliable AF is important for the choice of the optimal treatment. Commercial methods are frequently used without prior vigorous assessment. Resistance to AMB was over-reported with the commercial colorimetric method Sensititre YeastOne (SYO). SYO produced MICs that were 1 to 2 twofold dilutions higher than those of the reference CLSI method, resulting in 89% MaE. MaE were reduced using a SYO-specific colorimetric wild type upper limit MIC value of 8 mg/L (0%) or a 50% growth inhibition endpoint (3%).
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Candida auris - Comparison of sensititre YeastOne and Vitek 2 AST systems for antifungal susceptibility testing - A single centre experience
    Patwardhan, Sampada A.
    Prayag, Parikshit S.
    Soman, Rajeev N.
    Purandare, Bharat D.
    Ramya, S.
    Dawra, Romika
    Joshi, Rasika
    Prayag, Amrita P.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2024, 50
  • [2] Direct antifungal susceptibility testing of positive Candida blood cultures by Sensititre YeastOne
    Avolio, Manuela
    Grosso, Shamanta
    Bruschetta, Graziano
    De Rosa, Rita
    Camporese, Alessandro
    NEW MICROBIOLOGICA, 2009, 32 (02): : 179 - 184
  • [3] Identification of Candida species and susceptibility testing with Sensititre YeastOne microdilution panel to 9 antifungal agents
    Kucukates, Emine
    Gultekin, Nuh N.
    Alisan, Zeynep
    Hondur, Nur
    Ozturk, Recep
    SAUDI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 37 (07) : 749 - 756
  • [4] The Micronaut-AM antifungal susceptibility testing method does not overestimate amphotericin B resistance in Candida auris
    Mantzana, Paraskevi
    Protonotariou, Efthymia
    Meletis, Georgios
    Tychala, Areti
    Skoura, Lemonia
    MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM, 2024, 12 (05):
  • [5] Comparative evaluation of ATB Fungus 2 and Sensititre YeastOne panels for testing in vitro Candida antifungal susceptibility
    Eraso, Elena
    Ruesga, Maite
    Villar-Vidal, Maria
    Javier Carrillo-Munoz, Alfonso
    Espinel-Ingroff, Ana
    Quindos, Guillermo
    REVISTA IBEROAMERICANA DE MICOLOGIA, 2008, 25 (01): : 3 - 6
  • [6] Evaluation of the Vitek 2 system for antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida auris using a representative international panel of clinical isolates: overestimation of amphotericin B resistance and underestimation of fluconazole resistance
    Siopi, Maria
    Pachoulis, Ioannis
    Leventaki, Sevasti
    Spruijtenburg, Bram
    Meis, Jacques F.
    Pournaras, Spyros
    Vrioni, Georgia
    Tsakris, Athanasios
    Meletiadis, Joseph
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2024, 62 (04)
  • [7] Evaluation of Etest and MICRONAUT-AM Assay for Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Candida auris: Underestimation of Fluconazole Resistance by MICRONAUT-AM and Overestimation of Amphotericin B Resistance by Etest
    Asadzadeh, Mohammad
    Ahmad, Suhail
    Alfouzan, Wadha
    Al-Obaid, Inaam
    Spruijtenburg, Bram
    Meijer, Eelco F. J.
    Meis, Jacques F.
    Mokaddas, Eiman
    ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL, 2024, 13 (09):
  • [8] Comparison of the Sensititre YeastOne colorimetric microdilution panel and the NCCLS broth microdilution method for antifungal susceptibility testing against Candida species
    Bernal, S
    Aller, AI
    Chávez, M
    Valverde, A
    Serrano, C
    Gutiérrez, MJ
    Quindós, G
    Mazuelos, EM
    CHEMOTHERAPY, 2002, 48 (01) : 21 - 25
  • [9] Comparison of broth microdilution and Etest® methods for susceptibility testing of amphotericin B in Candida auris
    De Luca, Domenica G.
    Li, Xiao Rui
    Alexander, David C.
    Dingle, Tanis C.
    Dufresne, Philippe J.
    Hoang, Linda M.
    Kus, Julianne, V
    Sheitoyan-Pesant, Caroline
    Bharat, Amrita
    MEDICAL MYCOLOGY, 2025, 63 (03)
  • [10] Susceptibility testing of Leishmania spp. against amphotericin B and fluconazole using the Sensititre™ YeastOne™ YO9 platform
    Ruwandi Kariyawasam
    Priyanka Challa
    Rachel Lau
    Andrea K. Boggild
    BMC Infectious Diseases, 19