Automated decision-making

被引:13
|
作者
Ivanov, Stanislav Hristov [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Varna Univ Management, Varna, Bulgaria
[2] Zangador Res Inst, Varna, Bulgaria
来源
FORESIGHT | 2023年 / 25卷 / 01期
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Agency theory; Automated decision-making; Autonomous agents; Robonomics; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; AGENCY THEORY; PERFORMANCE; DISCRIMINATION; CLASSIFICATION; QUALITY; LEVEL; AI;
D O I
10.1108/FS-09-2021-0183
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];
学科分类号
0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;
摘要
Purpose This paper aims to analyse three decision-making approaches that involve humans and artificial autonomous agents, namely, human "in the loop", "on the loop" and "out of the loop" and identifies the decision characteristics that determine the choice of a decision-making approach. Design/methodology/approach This is a conceptual paper that analyses the relationships between the human and the artificial autonomous agents in the decision-making process from the perspectives of the agency theory, sustainability, legislation, economics and operations management. Findings The paper concludes that the human "out of the loop" approach is most suitable for quick, standardised, frequent decisions with low negative consequences of a wrong decision by the artificial intelligence taken within a well-defined context. Complex decisions with high outcome uncertainty that involve significant ethical issues require human participation in the form of a human "in the loop" or "on the loop" approach. Decisions that require high transparency need to be left to humans. Originality/value The paper evaluates the decision-making approaches from the perspectives of the agency theory, sustainability, legislation, economics and operations management and identifies the decision characteristics that determine the choice of a decision-making approach.
引用
收藏
页码:4 / 19
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reviewable Automated Decision-Making
    Cobbe, Jennifer
    Singh, Jatinder
    [J]. COMPUTER LAW & SECURITY REVIEW, 2020, 39
  • [2] DECISION-MAKING IN AN AUTOMATED AGE
    EHRLE, RA
    [J]. PERSONNEL JOURNAL, 1963, 42 (10) : 492 - 494
  • [3] POWER, PROCESS, AND AUTOMATED DECISION-MAKING
    Waldman, Ari Ezra
    [J]. FORDHAM LAW REVIEW, 2019, 88 (02) : 613 - 632
  • [4] Automated decision-making in public administration
    Monarcha-Matlak, Aleksandra
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE-BASED AND INTELLIGENT INFORMATION & ENGINEERING SYSTEMS (KSE 2021), 2021, 192 : 2077 - 2084
  • [5] Automated decision-making: Hoteliers' perceptions
    Ivanov, Stanislav
    Webster, Craig
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2024, 76
  • [6] Artificial Intuition for Automated Decision-Making
    Trovati, Marcello
    Teli, Khalid
    Polatidis, Nikolaos
    Cullen, Ufuk Alpsahin
    Bolton, Simon
    [J]. APPLIED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2023, 37 (01)
  • [7] Automated decision-making and the problem of evil
    Berber, Andrea
    [J]. AI & SOCIETY, 2023, 38 (06) : 2125 - 2132
  • [8] Citizens' attitudes towards automated decision-making
    Denk, Thomas
    Hedstrom, Karin
    Karlsson, Fredrik
    [J]. INFORMATION POLITY, 2022, 27 (03) : 391 - 408
  • [9] Conceptualizing Automated Decision-Making in Organizational Contexts
    Anna Katharina Boos
    [J]. Philosophy & Technology, 2024, 37 (3)
  • [10] Automated Decision-Making with TOPSIS for Water Analysis
    Javanbakht, T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES-UKRAINE, 2022, 9 (01): : H19 - H24