A hybrid multi-attribute decision-making and data envelopment analysis model with heterogeneous attributes: The case of sustainable development goals

被引:7
|
作者
Soltanifar, Mehdi [1 ]
Tavana, Madjid [2 ,3 ]
Santos-Arteaga, Francisco J. [4 ]
Sharafi, Hamid [5 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Math, Semnan Branch, Semnan, Iran
[2] La Salle Univ, Distinguished Chair Business Analyt, Business Syst & Analyt Dept, Philadelphia, PA 19141 USA
[3] Univ Paderborn, Fac Business Adm & Econ, Business Informat Syst Dept, Paderborn, Germany
[4] Univ Complutense Madrid, Dept Anal Econ & Econ Cuantitat, Madrid, Spain
[5] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Math, Sci & Res Branch, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Multi -attribute decision -making; Decision support; Data envelopment analysis; Goal programming; Sustainable development goals; Attribute classification; VOTING SYSTEM; RANKING ALTERNATIVES; DEA; EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsci.2023.06.004
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study presents an integrated multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) and data envelopment analysis (DEA) framework for solving problems with heterogeneous attributes. We classify the heterogeneous attributes into desirable and undesirable classes and provide a model for aggregating the attributes' weights and the alterna-tives' scores. The proposed model is initially designed as a Multiple Objective Decision Making (MODM) problem with a Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) policy and then reformulated as a linear programming model tackled through a goal programming approach. We apply the proposed model to a set of European countries based on their fulfillment of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) defined by the United Nations. We show the proposed approach minimizes computational efforts and complexities and maximizes the participation and satisfaction of decision-makers. We compare the rankings derived from our model with those obtained from standard MADM techniques such as Euclid and TOPSIS. We illustrate how the different normalization methods are applied to condition the discrimination power of the models and analyze the reversals triggered by TOPSIS relative to the other techniques. We conclude by noting that our model does not rely on the weights defined by the experts to determine the ranking, which constitutes a significant advantage over the standard MADM techniques in strategic evaluation environments.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 102
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Heterogeneous Interrelationships among Attributes in Multi-Attribute Decision-Making: An Empirical Analysis
    Chen, Zhen-Song
    Zhang, Xuan
    Rodriguez, Rosa M.
    Wang, Xian-Jia
    Chin, Kwai-Sang
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS, 2019, 12 (02) : 984 - 997
  • [2] Heterogeneous Interrelationships among Attributes in Multi-Attribute Decision-Making: An Empirical Analysis
    Zhen-Song Chen
    Xuan Zhang
    Rosa M. Rodríguez
    Xian-Jia Wang
    Kwai-Sang Chin
    [J]. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 2019, 12 : 984 - 997
  • [3] A hybrid data envelopment analysis and multi-attribute decision making approach to sustainability assessment
    Keshavarz, Esmaeil
    Toloo, Mehdi
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS, 2020, 37 (04)
  • [4] Research on Hybrid Multi-attribute Decision-Making
    Sun, Guidong
    Guan, Xin
    [J]. 2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CYBER-ENABLED DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING AND KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY PROCEEDINGS - CYBERC 2016, 2016, : 272 - 277
  • [5] Heterogeneous multi-attribute group decision making based on a fuzzy data envelopment analysis cross-efficiency model
    Huang, Yang
    Wang, Meiqiang
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2024, 238
  • [6] Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Model for Ranking of Web Development Frameworks
    Borissova, Daniela
    Dimitrova, Zornitsa
    Dimitrov, Vasil
    Yoshinov, Radoslav
    Garvanova, Magdalena
    Garvanov, Ivan
    [J]. 25TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CIRCUITS, SYSTEMS, COMMUNICATIONS AND COMPUTERS (CSCC 2021), 2021, : 3 - 8
  • [7] A Multi-attribute Decision-Making to Sustainable Construction Material Selection: A Bayesian BWM-SAW Hybrid Model
    Alkan, Ramazan
    Yucesan, Melih
    Gul, Muhammet
    [J]. ADVANCES IN BEST-WORST METHOD, BWM2021, 2022, : 67 - 78
  • [8] Development of a firm export performance measurement model using a hybrid multi-attribute decision-making method
    Dahooie, Jalil Heidary
    Meidute-Kavaliauskiene, Ieva
    Vanaki, Amir Salar
    Podviezko, Askoldas
    Beheshti Jazan Abadi, Elham
    [J]. MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2020, 58 (11) : 2349 - 2385
  • [9] A multi-attribute group decision-making method based on data envelopment analysis under parallel expert evaluation system
    Liu, Peide
    Zhang, Yizhen
    Xu, Hongxue
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2024, 243
  • [10] Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Model by Applying Grey Numbers
    Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
    Kaklauskas, Arturas
    Turskis, Zenonas
    Tamosaitiene, Jolanta
    [J]. INFORMATICA, 2009, 20 (02) : 305 - 320