The performance of machine learning approaches for attenuation correction of PET in neuroimaging: A meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Raymond, Confidence [1 ,2 ]
Jurkiewicz, Michael T. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Orunmuyi, Akintunde [4 ]
Liu, Linshan [2 ]
Dada, Michael Oluwaseun [5 ]
Ladefoged, Claes N. [6 ]
Teuho, Jarmo [7 ,8 ]
Anazodo, Udunna C. [1 ,2 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Western Univ, Dept Med Biophys, London, ON, Canada
[2] Lawson Hlth Res Inst, London, ON, Canada
[3] Western Univ, Dept Med Imaging, London, ON, Canada
[4] Kenyatta Univ Teaching Res & Referral Hosp, Nairobi, Kenya
[5] Fed Univ Technol, Dept Phys, Minna, Nigeria
[6] Rigshospitalet, Dept Clin Physiol Nucl Med & PET, Copenhagen, Denmark
[7] Turku Univ, Turku PET Ctr, Turku, Finland
[8] Turku Univ Hosp, Turku, Finland
[9] Montreal Neurol Inst, 3801 Rue Univ, Montreal, PQ H3A 2B4, Canada
关键词
Machine learning; Attenuation correction; Synthetic; -CT; Neuroimaging; PET; MRI; Brain PET; Systematic review; BRAIN; IMAGE; RECONSTRUCTION; ATLAS; TESTS; BIAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.neurad.2023.01.157
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: This systematic review provides a consensus on the clinical feasibility of machine learning (ML) methods for brain PET attenuation correction (AC). Performance of ML-AC were compared to clinical standards.Methods: Two hundred and eighty studies were identified through electronic searches of brain PET studies published between January 1, 2008, and August 1, 2022. Reported outcomes for image quality, tissue classifi-cation performance, regional and global bias were extracted to evaluate ML-AC performance. Methodological quality of included studies and the quality of evidence of analysed outcomes were assessed using QUADAS-2 and GRADE, respectively.Results: A total of 19 studies (2371 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Overall, the global bias of ML methods was 0.76 +/- 1.2%. For image quality, the relative mean square error (RMSE) was 0.20 +/- 0.4 while for tissues classification, the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) for bone/soft tissue/air were 0.82 +/- 0.1 / 0.95 +/- 0.03 / 0.85 +/- 0.14. Conclusions: In general, ML-AC performance is within acceptable limits for clinical PET imaging. The sparse information on ML-AC robustness and its limited qualitative clinical evaluation may hinder clinical imple-mentation in neuroimaging, especially for PET/MRI or emerging brain PET systems where standard AC approaches are not readily available.(c) 2023 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 326
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The neural network of sensory attenuation: A neuroimaging meta-analysis
    Gu, Jingjin
    Buidze, Tatia
    Zhao, Ke
    Glaescher, Jan
    Fu, Xiaolan
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2024, : 31 - 51
  • [2] MR Image-Based Attenuation Correction of Brain PET Imaging: Review of Literature on Machine Learning Approaches for Segmentation
    Mecheter, Imene
    Alic, Lejla
    Abbod, Maysam
    Amira, Abbes
    Ji, Jim
    JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2020, 33 (05) : 1224 - 1241
  • [3] MR Image-Based Attenuation Correction of Brain PET Imaging: Review of Literature on Machine Learning Approaches for Segmentation
    Imene Mecheter
    Lejla Alic
    Maysam Abbod
    Abbes Amira
    Jim Ji
    Journal of Digital Imaging, 2020, 33 : 1224 - 1241
  • [4] Machine learning with neuroimaging data to identify autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Song, Da-Yea
    Topriceanu, Constantin-Cristian
    Ilie-Ablachim, Denis C.
    Kinali, Maria
    Bisdas, Sotirios
    NEURORADIOLOGY, 2021, 63 (12) : 2057 - 2072
  • [5] Machine learning with neuroimaging data to identify autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Da-Yea Song
    Constantin-Cristian Topriceanu
    Denis C. Ilie-Ablachim
    Maria Kinali
    Sotirios Bisdas
    Neuroradiology, 2021, 63 : 2057 - 2072
  • [6] Artificial intelligence/machine learning for neuroimaging to predict hemorrhagic transformation: Systematic review/meta-analysis
    Dagher, Richard
    Ozkara, Burak Berksu
    Karabacak, Mert
    Dagher, Samir A.
    Rumbaut, Elijah Isaac
    Luna, Licia P.
    Yedavalli, Vivek S.
    Wintermark, Max
    JOURNAL OF NEUROIMAGING, 2024,
  • [7] A Meta-Analysis of Overfitting in Machine Learning
    Roelofs, Rebecca
    Fridovich-Keil, Sara
    Miller, John
    Shankar, Vaishaal
    Hardt, Moritz
    Recht, Benjamin
    Schmidt, Ludwig
    ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 32 (NIPS 2019), 2019, 32
  • [8] Artificial Intelligence for Diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Meta-analysis of Machine Learning Approaches
    Iannattone, Patrick A.
    Zhao, Xun
    VanHouten, Jacob
    Garg, Akhil
    Thao Huynh
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 36 (04) : 577 - 583
  • [9] Prediction error in reinforcement learning: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies
    Garrison, Jane
    Erdeniz, Burak
    Done, John
    NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2013, 37 (07): : 1297 - 1310
  • [10] Meta-analysis of neuroimaging data
    Kober, Hedy
    Wager, Tor D.
    WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2010, 1 (02) : 293 - 300