Techno-economic assessment of a novel algal-membrane system versus conventional wastewater treatment and advanced potable reuse processes: Part II

被引:6
|
作者
Lugo, Abdiel [1 ]
Xu, Xuesong [1 ]
Abeysiriwardana-Arachchige, I. S. A. [1 ]
Bandara, G. L. Chathurika L. [1 ]
Nirmalakhandan, Nagamany [1 ]
Xu, Pei [1 ]
机构
[1] New Mexico State Univ, Civil Engn Dept, Las Cruces, NM 88003 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Potable water reuse; Techno-economic assessment; Forward osmosis; Reverse osmosis; Algal wastewater treatment; Advanced water treatment; REVERSE-OSMOSIS SYSTEM; HYDROTHERMAL LIQUEFACTION; SEAWATER DESALINATION; DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; RO PRETREATMENT; PRODUCTION COST; MICROALGAE; PERFORMANCE; TECHNOLOGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117189
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study developed a comprehensive techno-economic assessment (TEA) framework to evaluate an innovative algae resource recovery and near zero-liquid discharge potable reuse system (i.e., the main system) in com-parison with a conventional potable water reuse system (i.e., the benchmark system). The TEA study aims to estimate the levelized costs of water of individual units and integrated processes including secondary wastewater treatment, advanced water purification for potable reuse, and sludge treatment. This would provide decision -makers valuable information regarding the capital and operational costs of the innovative main system versus a typical potable water reuse treatment train, along with possible routes of cost optimization and improvements for the design of full-scale facilities. The main system consists of (i) a novel algal-based wastewater treatment coupled with a dual forward osmosis and seawater reverse osmosis (Algal FO-SWRO) membranes system for potable water reuse and hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) to produce bioenergy and subsequent nutrients extraction from the harvested algal biomass. The benchmark system includes (ii) an advanced water purification facility (AWPF) that consists of a conventional activated sludge biological treatment (CAS), microfiltration (MF), brackish water reverse osmosis (BWRO), ultraviolet/advanced oxidation process (UV-AOP), and granular acti-vated carbon (GAC), with anaerobic digestion for sludge treatment. Capital expenditures (CAPEX) and opera-tional expenditures (OPEX) were calculated for each unit of both systems (i.e., sub-systems). Based on a 76% overall water recovery designed for the benchmark system, the water cost was estimated at $2.03/m3. The highest costs in the benchmark system were found on the CAS and the anaerobic digester, with the UV-AOP combined with GAC for hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) quenching as the driving factor in the increased costs of the system. The cost of the main system, based on an overall 88% water recovery, was estimated to be $1.97/m3, with costs mostly driven by the FO and SWRO membranes. With further cost reduction and optimization for FO membranes such as membrane cost, water recovery, and flux, the main system can provide a much more economically viable alternative in its application than a typical benchmark system.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] A techno-economic analysis of membrane-based advanced treatment processes for the reuse of municipal wastewater
    Kehrein, Philipp
    Jafari, Morez
    Slagt, Marc
    Cornelissen, Emile
    Osseweijer, Patricia
    Posada, John
    van Loosdrecht, Mark
    [J]. WATER REUSE, 2021, 11 (04) : 705 - 725
  • [2] Life cycle energy use and greenhouse gas emissions for a novel algal-osmosis membrane system versus conventional advanced potable water reuse processes: Part I
    Lugo, Abdiel
    Bandara, G. L. Chathurika L.
    Xu, Xuesong
    de Almeida, Juliano Penteado
    Abeysiriwardana-Arachchige, I. S. A.
    Nirmalakhandan, Nagamany
    Xu, Pei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 331
  • [3] Wastewater treatment and water reuse of food processing industries. part II: Techno-economic study of a membrane separation technique
    Hafez, Azza
    Khedr, Maaly
    Gadallah, Hanaa
    [J]. DESALINATION, 2007, 214 (1-3) : 261 - 272
  • [4] Enhanced Versus Conventional Sludge Anaerobic Processes: Performances and Techno-Economic Assessment
    Gianico, Andrea
    Bertanza, Giorgio
    Braguglia, Camilla M.
    Canato, Matteo
    Gallipoli, Agata
    Laera, Giuseppe
    Levantesi, Caterina
    Mininni, Giuseppe
    [J]. WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 2016, 88 (05) : 468 - 478
  • [5] Techno-economic analysis of olive wastewater treatment with a closed water approach by integrated membrane processes and advanced oxidation processes
    Innocenzi, Valentina
    Mazziotti di Celso, Giuseppe
    Prisciandaro, Marina
    [J]. WATER REUSE, 2021, 11 (01) : 122 - 135
  • [6] Reclamation and reuse of wastewater by membrane-based processes in a typical midstream petrochemical factory: a techno-economic analysis
    Cheng-Wei Lin
    Hai Nguyen Tran
    Ruey-Shin Juang
    [J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2024, 26 : 5419 - 5430
  • [7] Reclamation and reuse of wastewater by membrane-based processes in a typical midstream petrochemical factory: a techno-economic analysis
    Lin, Cheng-Wei
    Tran, Hai Nguyen
    Juang, Ruey-Shin
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 26 (02) : 5419 - 5430
  • [8] Modeling and Life Cycle Assessment of a Membrane Bioreactor-Membrane Distillation Wastewater Treatment System for Potable Reuse
    Glover, Callan J.
    Phillips, James A.
    Marchand, Eric A.
    Hiibel, Sage R.
    [J]. SEPARATIONS, 2022, 9 (06)
  • [9] Techno-economic characteristics of wastewater treatment plants retrofitted from the conventional activated sludge process to the membrane bioreactor process
    Tingwei Gao
    Kang Xiao
    Jiao Zhang
    Wenchao Xue
    Chunhai Wei
    Xiaoping Zhang
    Shuai Liang
    Xiaomao Wang
    Xia Huang
    [J]. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2022, 16
  • [10] Techno-economic characteristics of wastewater treatment plants retrofitted from the conventional activated sludge process to the membrane bioreactor process
    Gao, Tingwei
    Xiao, Kang
    Zhang, Jiao
    Xue, Wenchao
    Wei, Chunhai
    Zhang, Xiaoping
    Liang, Shuai
    Wang, Xiaomao
    Huang, Xia
    [J]. Frontiers of Environmental Science and Engineering, 2022, 16 (04):