Performance evaluation of different low-cost DIY air cleaner configurations

被引:2
|
作者
Myers, Nirmala T. [1 ]
Dillon, Kevin P. [1 ]
Han, Taewon T. [1 ]
Mainelis, Gediminas [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Environm Sci, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[2] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Environm Sci, 14 Coll Farm Rd, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
关键词
Andrea Ferro; HEALTH IMPACTS; FOREST-FIRE; EXPOSURE; SMOKE;
D O I
10.1080/02786826.2023.2249963
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Do-it-yourself (DIY) air cleaners have been proposed as an affordable alternative to expensive portable HEPA air cleaners; however, their performance data is still limited. This study evaluated the performance of single- and multi-filter DIY air cleaner configurations with different filter thickness (1, 2, and 4 inches) and MERV ratings (8, 11, and 13). The filters were selected based on their availability to the public, with the resulting cost of less than 50 and 100 USD for single- and multi-filter configurations, respectively. DIY air cleaners were challenged with polydisperse NaCl particles, and their clean air delivery rate (CADR) was determined for ultrafine (< 100nm) and 300nm particle number concentration and PM2.5 mass concentration. Twelve single-filter configurations with filters from three companies, a 2-filter configuration, and a Corsi-Rosenthal (C-R) box with four 2-inch filters were tested. The CADR ranged from 84 to 635 cfm, depending on the particle metric and filter configuration. Among the single-filter configurations, the 4-inch filter performed the best. The multi-filter models, especially the C-R box, demonstrated the highest CADR: comparable to and exceeding the CADR of portable HEPA air cleaners. In addition, the C-R box also provided the highest CADR per power input while resulting in the lowest noise level and fan motor temperature. In addition to performance, the cost of operating and maintaining DIY air cleaners is also discussed. Overall, this study shows that DIY air cleaners are an affordable and effective means to reduce particulate air pollutants, thus improving indoor air quality. [GRAPHICS] .
引用
收藏
页码:1128 / 1141
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A low-cost method for testing the performance of photocatalytic filter installed in an air cleaner
    Energy and Environment Research Laboratories, Industrial Technology Research Institute, Hsinchu, Taiwan
    Asian Conf. Refrig. Air Cond., ACRA - Green Breeze Asia: Front. Refrig., Heat Transf. Syst., 1600,
  • [3] Performance evaluation of low-cost air quality sensors: A review
    Kang, Ye
    Aye, Lu
    Ngo, Tuan Duc
    Zhou, Jin
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 818
  • [4] Performance Evaluation of Low-cost PurpleAir Sensors in Ambient Air
    Ko, Kabseok
    Cho, Seokheon
    Rao, Ramesh R.
    2020 IEEE 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA SCIENCE AND ADVANCED ANALYTICS (DSAA 2020), 2020, : 563 - 568
  • [5] In chamber calibration and performance evaluation of air quality low-cost sensors
    Agrawal, Deepali
    Saini, Anil Kumar
    Rai, Aakash Chand
    Kala, Prateek
    ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2024, 15 (12)
  • [6] DAWE LOW-COST ULTRASONIC CLEANER
    不详
    MACHINERY AND PRODUCTION ENGINEERING, 1970, 116 (2995): : 528 - &
  • [7] PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF LOW-COST HOUSES
    RAO, AGM
    MURTHY, DSR
    MASSON, P
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR HOUSING SCIENCE AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 1983, 7 (01): : 27 - 48
  • [8] Improvement of a Low-cost DIY Wave Gauge
    Virden, Matthew F.
    Temple, Nigel A.
    Webb, Bret M.
    Sparks, Eric L.
    JOURNAL OF EXTENSION, 2023, 61 (01):
  • [9] Evaluation of field calibration methods and performance of AQMesh, a low-cost air quality monitor
    Wahlborg, Dan
    Bjorling, Mikael
    Mattsson, Magnus
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2021, 193 (05)
  • [10] Evaluation of field calibration methods and performance of AQMesh, a low-cost air quality monitor
    Dan Wahlborg
    Mikael Björling
    Magnus Mattsson
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2021, 193