Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence-generated Responses to Common Plastic Surgery Questions

被引:6
|
作者
Copeland-Halperin, Libby R. [1 ]
O'Brien, Lauren [2 ]
Copeland, Michelle [3 ]
机构
[1] Northwell Hlth, 1001 Fifth Ave, New York, NY 10028 USA
[2] Michelle Copeland DMD MD PC, New York, NY USA
[3] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, New York, NY USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/GOX.0000000000005226
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used to answer questions, yet the accuracy and validity of current tools are uncertain. In contrast to internet queries, AI generates summary responses as definitive. The internet is rife with inaccuracies, and plastic surgery management guidelines evolve, making verifiable information important.Methods: We posed 10 questions about breast implant-associated illness, anaplastic large lymphoma, and squamous carcinoma to Bing, using the "more balanced" option, and to ChatGPT. Answers were reviewed by two plastic surgeons for accuracy and fidelity to information on the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) websites. We also presented 10 multiple-choice questions from the 2022 plastic surgery in-service examination to Bing, using the "more precise" option, and ChatGPT. Questions were repeated three times over consecutive weeks, and answers were evaluated for accuracy and stability.Results: Compared with answers from the FDA and ASPS, Bing and ChatGPT were accurate. Bing answered 10 of the 30 multiple-choice questions correctly, nine incorrectly, and did not answer 11. ChatGPT correctly answered 16 and incorrectly answered 14. In both parts, responses from Bing were shorter, less detailed, and referred to verified and unverified sources; ChatGPT did not provide citations.Conclusions: These AI tools provided accurate information from the FDA and ASPS websites, but neither consistently answered questions requiring nuanced decision-making correctly. Advances in applications to plastic surgery will require algorithms that selectively identify, evaluate, and exclude information to enhance the accuracy, precision, validity, reliability, and utility of AI-generated responses.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence-generated Responses to Common Plastic Surgery Questions
    Daungsupawong, Hinpetch
    Wiwanitkit, Virus
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2023, 11 (11)
  • [2] Evaluation of Online Artificial Intelligence-Generated Information on Common Hand Procedures
    Crook, Bryan S.
    Park, Caroline N.
    Hurley, Eoghan T.
    Richard, Marc J.
    Pidgeon, Tyler S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2023, 48 (11): : 1122 - 1127
  • [3] Evaluation of the quality and quantity of artificial intelligence-generated responses about anesthesia and surgery: using ChatGPT 3.5 and 4.0
    Choi, Jisun
    Oh, Ah Ran
    Park, Jungchan
    Kang, Ryung A.
    Yoo, Seung Yeon
    Lee, Dong Jae
    Yang, Kwangmo
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 11
  • [4] Both Patients and Plastic Surgeons Prefer Artificial Intelligence-Generated Microsurgical Information
    Berry, Charlotte E.
    Fazilat, Alexander Z.
    Lavin, Christopher
    Lintel, Hendrik
    Cole, Naomi
    Stingl, Cybil S.
    Valencia, Caleb
    Morgan, Annah G.
    Momeni, Arash
    Wan, Derrick C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RECONSTRUCTIVE MICROSURGERY, 2024,
  • [5] Synthetic Realities and Artificial Intelligence-Generated Contents
    Moreira, Daniel
    Marcel, Sebastien
    Rocha, Anderson
    [J]. IEEE SECURITY & PRIVACY, 2024, 22 (03) : 7 - 10
  • [6] Assessing Artificial Intelligence-Generated Responses to Urology Patient In-Basket Messages
    Scott, Michael
    Muncey, Wade
    Seranio, Nicolas
    Belladelli, Federico
    Del Giudice, Francesco
    Li, Shufeng
    Ha, Albert
    Glover, Frank
    Zhang, Chiyuan Amy
    Eisenberg, Michael L.
    [J]. UROLOGY PRACTICE, 2024, 11 (05)
  • [7] Qualitative evaluation of artificial intelligence-generated weight management diet plans
    Kim, Dong Wook
    Park, Ji Seok
    Sharma, Kavita
    Velazquez, Amanda
    Li, Lu
    Ostrominski, John W.
    Tran, Tram
    Seitter Perez, Robert H.
    Shin, Jeong-Hun
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN NUTRITION, 2024, 11
  • [8] A Case Study in Artificial Intelligence-Generated Manuscripts
    Kammer, Michael N.
    [J]. CHEST, 2023, 164 (02) : 478 - 480
  • [9] Analyzing and Utilizing Artificial Intelligence-Generated Contents
    Mondal, Himel
    Mondal, Shaikat
    Podder, Indrasish
    [J]. INDIAN DERMATOLOGY ONLINE JOURNAL, 2024, 15 (01) : 164 - 165
  • [10] Synthetic Realities and Artificial Intelligence-Generated Contents
    Moreira, Daniel
    Marcel, Sebastien
    Rocha, Anderson
    [J]. IEEE SECURITY & PRIVACY, 2024, 22 (04) : 101 - 102