Participatory action research

被引:69
|
作者
Cornish, Flora [1 ]
Breton, Nancy [1 ]
Moreno-Tabarez, Ulises [2 ]
Delgado, Jenna [3 ]
Rua, Mohi [4 ]
Aikins, Ama de-Graft [5 ]
Hodgetts, Darrin [6 ]
机构
[1] London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, Dept Methodol, London, England
[2] Univ Autonoma Guerrero, Dept Gest Desarrollo Sustentable, CONACyT, Acapulco, Guerrero, Mexico
[3] Calif State Univ Northridge, Dept Commun Studies, Northridge, CA USA
[4] Univ Auckland, Maori Studies, Auckland, Aotearoa, New Zealand
[5] UCL, Inst Adv Studies, London, England
[6] Massey Univ, Sch Psychol, Albany, Aotearoa, New Zealand
来源
NATURE REVIEWS METHODS PRIMERS | 2023年 / 3卷 / 01期
关键词
ETHICAL CHALLENGES; YOUNG-PEOPLE; COMMUNITY; REFLECTIONS;
D O I
10.1038/s43586-023-00214-1
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Participatory action research (PAR) involves the participation and leadership of people experiencing issues, who take action to produce emancipatory social change, through conducting systematic research to generate new knowledge. In this Primer, Cornish et al. set out key considerations for the design of a PAR project and discuss ways to overcome the challenges faced by PAR projects. Participatory action research (PAR) is an approach to research that prioritizes the value of experiential knowledge for tackling problems caused by unequal and harmful social systems, and for envisioning and implementing alternatives. PAR involves the participation and leadership of those people experiencing issues, who take action to produce emancipatory social change, through conducting systematic research to generate new knowledge. This Primer sets out key considerations for the design of a PAR project. The core of the Primer introduces six building blocks for PAR project design: building relationships; establishing working practices; establishing a common understanding of the issue; observing, gathering and generating materials; collaborative analysis; and planning and taking action. We discuss key challenges faced by PAR projects, namely, mismatches with institutional research infrastructure; risks of co-option; power inequalities; and the decentralizing of control. To counter such challenges, PAR researchers may build PAR-friendly networks of people and infrastructures; cultivate a critical community to hold them to account; use critical reflexivity; redistribute powers; and learn to trust the process. PAR's societal contribution and methodological development, we argue, can best be advanced by engaging with contemporary social movements that demand the redressingl of inequities and the recognition of situated expertise.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Participatory Action Research
    Fields, Jacqueline
    [J]. QUALITATIVE REPORT, 2014, 19 (06)
  • [2] Participatory action research
    Flora Cornish
    Nancy Breton
    Ulises Moreno-Tabarez
    Jenna Delgado
    Mohi Rua
    Ama de-Graft Aikins
    Darrin Hodgetts
    [J]. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 3
  • [3] PARTICIPATORY ACTION RESEARCH
    WALKER, ML
    [J]. REHABILITATION COUNSELING BULLETIN, 1993, 37 (01) : 2 - 5
  • [4] Participatory Action Research
    Barnett, Tracey Marie
    [J]. SOCIAL WORK, 2016, 61 (01) : 95 - 95
  • [5] Participatory action research
    [J]. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 3 (1):
  • [6] Participatory action research
    Ozanne, Julie L.
    Saatcioglu, Bige
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2008, 35 (03) : 423 - 439
  • [7] Participatory Action Research
    Stolerman, Marina
    Silverstein, Louise Bordeaux
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY OF WOMEN QUARTERLY, 2009, 33 (02) : 253 - 254
  • [8] Participatory action research
    Baum, Fran
    MacDougall, Colin
    Smith, Danielle
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2006, 60 (10): : 854 - 857
  • [9] Putting "participatory" into participatory forms of action research
    Frisby, W
    Reid, CJ
    Millar, S
    Hoeber, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPORT MANAGEMENT, 2005, 19 (04) : 367 - 386
  • [10] Theorizing Legal Participatory Action Research: Critical Race/Feminism and Participatory Action Research
    Houh, Emily M. S.
    Kalsem, Kristin
    [J]. QUALITATIVE INQUIRY, 2015, 21 (03) : 262 - 276