Outcome of Management of Mandibular Sub condylar Fractures Based on Classification System Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to determine the amount of ramal height shortening and degree of displacement of sub condylar fracture that should be considered for effective management of mandibular sub condylar fractures using cone-beam computed tomography.Patients and MethodsA prospective study of forty-two patients, who presented with unilateral sub condylar fracture was done. All patients were classified into Class I, II and III based on the degree of displacement of fractured segment and amount of ramal height shortening measured using cone-beam computed tomography. The treatment protocol was closed reduction and maxillomandibular fixation for Class I patients and open reduction and internal fixation for Class II and III patients. Outcomes of treatment were measured postoperatively 2 weeks, 1 and 3 months clinically. The variables, such as mouth opening, lateral and protrusive movements, deviation, pain and occlusion were studied.ResultsAmong forty-two patients, twenty had Class I fractures, twelve had Class II fractures and ten had Class III fractures. Overall, no statistically significant differences were found between Class I and Class II groups in terms of functional outcomes and there were statistically significant differences between Class I and III groups. Class I fractures can be considered for closed method and open reduction is recommended for Class II and III fractures. The sample was composed of 42 patients grouped as follows: Class I (n = 20), Class II (n = 12), and Class III (n = 10) for treatment of sub condylar fractures. There were no significant differences between the three groups for the study variables at baseline, except for mouth opening and pain. There was significant difference in mouth opening between Class I and III cases (p 0.001) and insignificant difference in mouth opening in Class I and II cases (p 0.98). Persistent pain was elicited more in surgical Class II and III (n = 5) than non-surgical cases Class I (n = 0) on 3 months follow-up.ConclusionThe study emphasises on use of three-dimensional diagnostic modality like cone-beam computed tomography for accurately classifying sub condylar fractures. The results favour closed reduction for mildly displaced Class I cases and surgical management of significantly displaced Class III fractures. The need for open reduction for Class II patients classified using CBCT is negligible assessing risks associated with surgical procedure which is contradictory to our protocol which requires a further comparative evaluation among Class II group.