Risk behavior among farmers: examining expected utility and prospect theory approach

被引:0
|
作者
Kushawaha, Raghavendra [1 ]
Sharma, Naresh Kumar [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hyderabad, Sch Econ, Room 208,Wing-A,NRS Hostel, Hyderabad 500046, India
[2] Univ Hyderabad, Sch Econ, Hyderabad 500046, India
[3] Univ Hyderabad, Sch Econ, Social Sci Bldg, Hyderabad 500046, India
关键词
Risk attitude; Holt-Laury method; Prospect theory; Experimental economics; C91; D81; DECISION-MAKING; TIME-PREFERENCES; ATTITUDES; AVERSION; UNCERTAINTY; DETERMINANTS; COUNTRIES; ADOPTION; CHOICE; UGANDA;
D O I
10.1007/s40847-023-00305-5
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
In developing world, the risk behavior of farmers is very crucial as their daily risk and uncertainty decisions affect their livelihood and overall well-being in the long run. Recent studies related to risky choices among poor farmers found varied results in various countries. The present study investigated farmers' risk behavior in one of the leading states in agricultural growth in recent time, the Indian state of Madhya Pradesh. This study used Holt-Laury experimental method to assess the determinants of risk for farmers with limited literacy and capabilities. It also compared two methods-expected utility theory and prospect theory and found significant risk aversion and probability distortion. This study also found socioeconomic characteristics are more important in determining risk curvature and probability weighting than income hypothesis and follows an S-shaped curve, which is inconsistent with the proposition of Tversky and Kahneman (Econometrica 47(2):263-291, 1979 10.2307/1914185) and (J Risk Uncertain, 5:297-323, 1992).
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Maximum Expected Utility Portfolios versus Prospect Theory Approach
    Dudzinska-Baryla, Renata
    Kopanska-Brodka, Donata
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 25TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN ECONOMICS 2007, 2007, : 63 - 70
  • [2] Expected utility or prospect theory maximisers? Assessing farmers' risk behaviour from field-experiment data
    Bocqueho, Geraldine
    Jacquet, Florence
    Reynaud, Arnaud
    [J]. EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 41 (01) : 135 - 172
  • [3] Expected Utility Theory, Prospect Theory, and Regret Theory Compared for Prediction of Route Choice Behavior
    Ramos, Giselle de Moraes
    Daamen, Winnie
    Hoogendoorn, Serge
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2011, (2230) : 19 - 28
  • [4] The Limitations of Prospect Theory and the Expected Utility Theory: A New Theory
    Alghalith, Moawia
    [J]. ATLANTIC ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2010, 38 (02) : 243 - 244
  • [5] Expected utility theory and prospect theory: one wedding and a decent funeral
    Harrison, Glenn W.
    Rutstrom, E. Elisabet
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 12 (02) : 133 - 158
  • [6] Expected utility theory and prospect theory: one wedding and a decent funeral
    Glenn W. Harrison
    E. Elisabet Rutström
    [J]. Experimental Economics, 2009, 12
  • [7] The predictive validity of prospect theory versus expected utility in health utility measurement
    Maria Abellan-Perpinan, Jose
    Bleichrodt, Han
    Luis Pinto-Prades, Jose
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2009, 28 (06) : 1039 - 1047
  • [8] Risk, rationality and expected utility theory
    Pettigrew, Richard
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 2015, 45 (5-6) : 798 - 826
  • [9] Expected utility versus cumulative prospect theory in an evolutionary model of bargaining
    Khan, Abhimanyu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 2022, 137
  • [10] Explaining the energy efficiency gap - Expected Utility Theory versus Cumulative Prospect Theory
    Haeckel, Bjoern
    Pfosser, Stefan
    Traenkler, Timm
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2017, 111 : 414 - 426